submitted | available | document details (if available) | source link |
---|---|---|---|
July 08 2019 | July 08 2019 |
various | SAR Test Report | Test Report | 3.95 MiB | July 08 2019 |
On your side TEST REPORT FCC SAR Test for certification of K44501100 APPLICANT JVCKENWOOD Corporation REPORT NO. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 DATE OF ISSUE Aug. 01, 2019 HCT Co., Ltd. 74, Seoicheon-ro 578beon-gil, Majang-myeon, Icheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17383 KOREA Tel. +82 31 634 6300 F ax. +82 31 645 6401 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 REVISION HISTORY The revision history for this test report is shown in table. Revision No. Date of Issue 0 Aug. 01, 2019 Description Initial Release F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 3 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 CONTENTS 1. Test Regulations ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Test Location ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Information of the EUT ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 4. Output Power Specifications .................................................................................................................................................. 8 5. Manufacturers Accessory List ............................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13 7. Description of test equipment ............................................................................................................................................. 14 8. SAR Measurement Procedure ............................................................................................................................................... 17 9. Description of Test Position.................................................................................................................................................. 19 10. RF Exposure Limits ................................................................................................................................................................. 21 11. System Verification................................................................................................................................................................. 22 12. SAR Test Data Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 13. Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................................... 27 14. SAR Test Equipment ............................................................................................................................................................. 28 15. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................................... 29 16. References................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 Attachment 1. SAR Test Plots ................................................................................................................................................ 32 Attachment 2. Dipole Verification Plots ............................................................................................................................. 33 Attachment 3. SAR Tissue Characterization ...................................................................................................................... 38 Attachment 4. SAR System Validation ................................................................................................................................ 39 Attachment 5. Probe Calibration Data ............................................................................................................................... 40 Attachment 6. Dipole Calibration Data .............................................................................................................................. 80 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 4 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 1. Test Regulations The tests were performed according to the following regulations:
Test Standard IEEE Standard 1528-2013 & KDB procedures Test Method
- FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01 General SAR Guidance v06
- FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01 SAR measurement 100 to 6 GHz v01r04
- FCC KDB Publication 865664 D02 SAR Reporting v01r02
- FCC KDB Publication 643646 D01 SAR Test for PTT Radios v01r03 2. Test Location 2.1 Test Laboratory Company Name HCT Co., Ltd. 74, Seoicheon-ro 578beon-gil, Majang-myeon, Icheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17383 KOREA 031-645-6300 031-645-6401 Address Telephone Fax. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 5 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 3. Information of the EUT 3.1 General Information of the EUT Model Name NX-1300-K4, NX-1300-K5 Equipment Type UHF TRANSCEIVER K44501100 JVCKENWOOD Corporation FCC ID Applicant 3.2 DUT description 7 Key with LCD non Key, non LCD
* Tow type of sample comparison result 7 key with LCD type SAR is high, so the entire test is proceeded. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 6 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 3.3 Attestation of test result of device under test The Highest Reported SAR (W/Kg) Band Tx. Frequency
() Equipment Class Reported 1g SAR SAR (W/kg) Hand-held to Face Body-Worn Belt clip UHF (FCC) 406.1 ~ 470 TNF 4.78 6.82 Simultaneous SAR per KDB 690783 D01v01r03 N/A Date(s) of Tests:
Jul. 22, 2019 ~ Jul. 24, 2019 Note : The Duty Cycle of PTT was 50% applied. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 7 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 4. Output Power Specifications This device operates using the following maximum output power specifications. SAR values were scaled to the maximum allowed power to determine compliance per KDB publication 447498 D01v06. 4.1 Maximum Output Power Band UHF Frequency Power 406.1 ~ 470 5 W (0.2W) 4.2 Output Average Conducted Power Frequency () Type Channel Power (dBm) NX-1300-K4 NX-1300-K5 406.15 Analog 422.05 Analog 438.05 Analog 454.05 Analog 469.95 Analog 1 2 3 4 5 36.60 36.31 36.34 36.35 36.33 For FCC Band:
Per KDB 447498 D01v06 Page 7 section 6) pages 7-8, the number of channels required to be tested is as follows. F high = 470.0 MHz F c = 438.05 MHz F Low = 406.1 MHz N c = Round {[100(f high f low) / fc]0.5 X (fc / 100)0.2} = Round {[100(470-406.1) / 438.05]0.5 X (438.05/100)0.2} = 5 Therefore, for the frequency band from 406.1 MHz to 470, 5channels are required for testing. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 8 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 5. Manufacturers Accessory List Part Nol. Description Accessory Type Accessory KRA-23M UHF Low Profile Helical Antenna (440-490 MHz) KRA-23M2 UHF Low Profile Helical Antenna (470-520 MHz) KRA-23M3 UHF Low Profile Helical Antenna (400-450 MHz) KRA-27M KRA-27M2 KRA-27M3 KRA-42M KRA-42M2 KRA-42M3 KNB-45L KNB-53N KNB-29N KNB-69L UHF Whip Antenna (440-490 MHz) UHF Whip Antenna (470-520 MHz) antenna UHF Whip Antenna (400-450 MHz) UHF Stubby Antenna (440-490 MHz) UHF Stubby Antenna (470-520 MHz) UHF Stubby Antenna (400-450 MHz) Li-Ion Battery Pack (2,000mA) Ni-MH Battery Pack (1,400mA) Ni-MH Battery Pack (1,500mA) Battery Li-ion Battery Pack (2,550mA) KNB-82LC Li-ion Battery Pack for IS (1,900mA) KWR-1 KBH-10 KLH-187 KLH-178 KLH-181PC KLH-182PG KBH-8DS KLH-6SW KMC-45D KMC-45 KMC-21 KEP-2 KHS-10-BH KHS-10-OH KHS-10D-BH KHS-10D-OH KHS-7 KHS-7A KHS-8BL KHS-8BE KHS-8NC Water Resistance Bag Belt Clip Nylon Case Leather Case Leather Case w/ Integral Belt Clip Leather Case w/ Swivel Belt Loop Leather Swivel Belt Loop Leather Swivel Belt Loop Speaker Microphone Speaker Microphone Compact Speaker Microphone 25mm Earphone kit for KMC-45 Heavy-duty headset Heavy-duty headset Heavy-duty headset Heavy-duty headset Single Muff Headset Single Muff Headset w/in-line PTT 2-Wire Palm Mic w/ Earphone 2-Wire Palm Mic w/ Earphone 2-Wire Palm Mic w/ Earphone, NC Carrying Accessories Microphones &
Audio Accessories 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 9 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Description Accessory Type Accessory Part Nol. KHS-9BL KHS-9BE KHS-22 KHS-22A KHS-23 KHS-25 KHS-26 KHS-27 KHS-27A KHS-31 KHS-31C KHS-1 KHS-21 KHS-29F EMC-11 KHS-35F EMC-12 3-Wire Lapel Mic w/ Earphone 3-Wire Lapel Mic w/ Earphone Behind-the-head Headset w/PTT Behind-the-head Headset w/PTT 2-Wire Palm Mic D-Ring Ear Headset Ear bund In-line PTT Headset D-Ring In-line PTT Headset D-Ring In-line PTT Headset C-Ring Headset C-Ring Headset Headset with PTT/VOX Headset Headset Clip Microphone with Earphone Headset Clip Microphone with Earphone Microphones &
Audio Accessories 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 KMC-48GPS GPS Speaker Microphone
* Note: Battery Dimensions No. description Size (mm) KNB-45L Li-Ion Battery Pack (2,000 mA) WHD 54.0 x 114.7 x 17.7 KNB-53N Ni-MH Battery Pack (1,400 mA) WHD 54.0 x 114.7 x 17.7 KNB-29N Ni-MH Battery Pack (1,500 mA) WHD 54.0 x 114.7 x 17.7 KNB-69L Li-ion Battery Pack (2,550 mA) WHD 54.0 x 114.7 x 21.8 KNB-82LC Li-ion Battery Pack for IS (1,900 mA) WHD 54.0 x 114.7 x 17.7 This SAR report is the result of a change test for the addition of a battery Since the additional battery has the biggest capacity of the battery, the Head Face SAR test were performed the Full SAR test and the body worn SAR were evaluated under the worst case condition of the original SAR report. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 10 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Radio Face Test (Hand-held to Face) Battery 1 Ant. 1 Ant. 2 Ant. 3 Ant. 4 Ant. 5 Ant. 6 Ant. 7 Ant. 8 Ant. 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Battery 2 Ant. 1 Ant. 2 Ant. 3 Ant. 4 Ant. 5 Ant. 6 Ant. 7 Ant. 8 Ant. 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Battery 3 Ant. 1 Ant. 2 Ant. 3 Ant. 4 Ant. 5 Ant. 6 Ant. 7 Ant. 8 Ant. 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Battery 4 Ant. 1 Ant. 2 Ant. 3 Ant. 4 Ant. 5 Ant. 6 Ant. 7 Ant. 8 Ant. 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Battery 5 Ant. 1 Ant. 2 Ant. 3 Ant. 4 Ant. 5 Ant. 6 Ant. 7 Ant. 8 Ant. 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 11 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Audio Accessory 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Radio Body Test (Body-Worn) Battery 2 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 3 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 1 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 4 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 5 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
* Manufactures disclosed accessory listing information provided by Kenwood corporation. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 12 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 6. Introduction The FCC has adopted the guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation in ET Docket 93-62 on Aug. 6, 1996 to protect the public and workers from the potential hazards of RF emissions due to FCC-regulated portable devices. The safety limits used for the environmental evaluation measurements are based on the criteria published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) in IEEE/ANSI C95.1-1992 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. 1992 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York 10017. The measurement procedure described in IEEE/ANSI C95.3-1992 Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave is used for guidance in measuring SAR due to the RF radiation exposure from the Equipment Under Test (EUT). These criteria for SAR evaluation are similar to those recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) in Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86 NCRP, 1986, Bethesda, MD 20814. SAR is a measure of the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting source. SAR values have been related to threshold levels for potential biological hazards. SAR Definition Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is defined as the time derivative of the incremental electromagnetic energy
(dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dV) of a given density (r ). It is also defined as the rate of RF energy absorption per unit mass at a point in an absorbing body.
=
)
(
Figure 1. SAR Mathematical Equation SAR is expressed in units of Watts per Kilogram (W/kg)
= /
Where:
= conductivity of the tissue-simulant material (S/m)
= mass density of the tissue-simulant material (kg/)
= Total RMS electric field strength (V/m) NOTE: The primary factors that control rate of energy absorption were found to be the wavelength of the incident field in relations to the dimensions and geometry of the irradiated organism, the orientation of the organism in relation to the polarity of field vectors, the presence of reflecting surfaces, and whether conductive contact is made by the organism with a ground plane. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 13 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 7. Description of test equipment 7.1 SAR MEASUREMENT SETUP These measurements are performed using the DASY4 automated dosimetric assessment system. It is made by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG) in Zurich, Switzerland. It consists of high precision robotics system (Staubli), robot controller, Pentium III computer, near-field probe, probe alignment sensor, and the generic twin phantom containing the brain equivalent material. The robot is a six-axis industrial robot performing precise movements to position the probe to the location (points) of maximum electromagnetic field (EMF) (see Figure.2). A cell controller system contains the power supply, robot controller, teach pendant (Joystick), and remote control, is used to drive the robot motors. The PC with Windows XP or Windows 7 is working with SAR Measurement system DASY4 & DASY5, A/D interface card, monitor, mouse, and keyboard. The Staubli Robot is connected to the cell controller to allow software manipulation of the robot. A data acquisition electronic
(DAE) circuit performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. is connected to the Electro-optical coupler (EOC). The EOC performs the conversion from the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the PC plug-in card. Figure 2. HCT SAR Lab. Test Measurement Set-up The DAE consists of a highly sensitive electrometer-grade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a channel and gain-
switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD-converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the PC-card is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information and an optical uplink for commands and clock lines. The mechanical probe mounting device includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sidewise probe contacts. They are also used for mechanical surface detection and probe collision detection. The robot uses its own controller with a built in VME-bus computer. The system is described in detail in. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 14 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 7.2 ELI Phantom Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 to 6 GHz. ELI is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup, including all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with all SPEAG diametric probes and dipoles. Figure 6.1 ELI Phantom Shell Thickness Filling Volume Dimensions 2.0 0.2mm approx. 30 liters Major axis: 600 mm, Minor axis: 400 mm 7.3 Device Holder for Transmitters Device Holder Mounting Device In combination with the SAM Phantom, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates whereby the rotation points is the ear opening. The devices can be easily, accurately, and repeatable positioned according to the EN 50360:2001/A:2001 and FCC KDB specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). Note: A simulating human hand is not used due to the complex anatomical and geometrical structure of the hand that may produced infinite number of configurations. To produce the Worst-case condition (the hand absorbs antenna output power), the hand is omitted during the tests. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 15 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 7.4 Validation Dipole The reference dipole should have a return loss better than -20 dB (measured in the setup) at the resonant frequency to reduce the uncertainty in the power measurement. 450 Dipole System Validation Dipole ymmetrical dipole with /4 balun. Enables measurement of Description feedpoint impedance with network analyzer (NWA). Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with tissue simulating liquids. Frequency Return Loss Power Capability 450
> 20 dB at specified validation position
> 100 W ( f < 1GHz), >40 W ( f > 1 GHz) Dimension D450V2: dipole length : 272.0 mm ; overall height : 330.0 mm 7.5 Brain & Muscle Tissue Simulating Mixture Characterization The brain and muscle mixtures consist of a viscous gel using hydrox-ethyl cellulose (HEC) gelling agent and saline solution (see Table 1). Preservation with a bactericide is added and visual inspection is made to make sure air bubbles are not trapped during the mixing process. The mixture is calibrated to obtain proper dielectric constant (permittivity) and conductivity of the desired tissue. The mixture characterizations used for the brain and muscle tissue simulating liquids are according to the data by C. Gabriel and G. Hartsgrove. Fig 4. Composition of the Tissue Equivalent Matter F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 16 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 8. SAR Measurement Procedure The evaluation was performed using the following procedure compliant to FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013 1. The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head or body was measured at a distance no more than 5.0 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the DUTs head and body area and the horizontal grid resolution was depending on the FCC KDB 865664 D01v01r04 table 4-
1 & IEEE 1528-2013. 2. Based on step, the area of the maximum absorption was determined by sophisticated interpolations routines implemented in DASY software. When an Area Scan has measured all reachable point. DASY system computes the field maximal found in the scanned are, within a range of the maximum. SAR at this fixed point was measured and used as a reference value. 3. Around this point, a volume was assessed according to the measurement resolution and volume size requirements of FCC KDB 865664 D01v01r04 table 4-1 and IEEE 1528-2013. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated with the following procedure (reference from the DASY manual.) a. The data at the surface were extrapolated, since the center of the dipoles is no more than 2.7 mm away from the tip of the probe (it is different from the probe type) and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is 1.2 mm. The extrapolation was based on a least square algorithm. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in z-axes. This polynomial was then used to evaluate the points between the surface and the probe tip. b. The maximum interpolated value was searched with a straight-forward algorithm. Around this maximum the SAR values averaged over the spatial volumes (1 g or 10 g) were computed using the 3D-
Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-spline is composed of three one-dimensional splines with the Not a knot condition (in x, y, and z directions. The volume was integrated with the trapezoidal algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were interpolated to calculate the average. c. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. 4. The SAR reference value, at the same location as step 2, was re-measured after the zoom scan. If the value changed by more than 5 %, the SAR evaluation and drift measurements were repeated. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 17 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Area scan and zoom scan resolution setting follow KDB 865664 D01v01r04 quoted below. Maximum distance from closest measurement point
(geometric center of probe sensors) to phantom surface 3 GHz 51 mm
> 3 GHz 1 2 ln(2)0.5 mm Maximum probe angle from probe axis to phantom surface normal at the measurement location 301 201 Maximum area scan Spatial resolution: xArea, yArea Maximum zoom scan Spatial resolution: xzoom, yzoom uniform grid: zzoom(n) Maximum zoom scan Spatial resolution normal to phantom surface graded grid zzoom(1): between 1 st two Points closest to phantom surface zzoom(n>1): between subsequent Points Minimum zoom scan volume x, y, z 2 GHz: 15 mm 2-3 GHz: 12 mm 3-4 GHz: 12 mm 4-6 GHz: 10 mm When the x or y dimension of the test device, in the measurement plane orientation, is smaller than the above, the measurement resolution must be the corresponding x or y dimension of the test device with at least one measurement point on the test device. 2 GHz: 8mm 2-3 GHz: 5mm*
3-4 GHz: 5 mm*
4-6 GHz: 4 mm*
5 mm 4 mm 3-4 GHz: 4 mm 4-5 GHz: 3 mm 5-6 GHz: 2 mm 3-4 GHz: 3 mm 4-5 GHz: 2.5 mm 5-6 GHz: 2 mm 1.5zzoom(n-1) 30 mm 3-4 GHz: 28 mm 4-5 GHz: 25 mm 5-6 GHz: 22 mm Note: is the penetration depth of a plane-wave at normal incidence to the tissue medium; see draft standard IEEE P1528-2011 for details.
* When zoom scan is required and the reported SAR from the area scan based 1-g SAR estimation procedures of KDB 447498 is 1.4 W/kg, 8 mm, 7 mm and 5 mm zoom scan resolution may be applied, respectively, for 2 GHz to 3 GHz, 3 GHz to 4 GHz and 4 GHz to 6 GHz. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 18 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 9. Description of Test Position 9.1 Body Holster/Belt Clip Configurations Body-worn operating configurations are tested with the belt-clips and holsters attached to the device and positioned against a flat phantom in a normal use configuration. A device with a headset output is tested with a headset connected to the device. Body dielectric parameters are used. Accessories for Body-worn operation configurations are divided into two categories: those that do not contain metallic components and those that contain metallic components. When multiple accessories that do not contain metallic components are supplied with the device, the device is tested with only the accessory that dictates the closest spacing to the body. Then multiple accessories that contain metallic components are tested with each accessory. If multiple accessory share an identical metallic component (i.e. the same metallic belt-clip used with different holsters with no other metallic components) only the accessory that dictates the closest spacing to the body is tested. Body-worn accessories may not always be supplied or available as options for some Devices intended to be authorized for body-worn use. In this case, a test configuration with a separation distance between the back of the device and the flat phantom is used. Since this EUT does not supply any body worn accessory to the end user a distance of 0 cm from the EUT back surface to the liquid interface is configured for the generic test.
"See the Test SET-UP Photo"
Transmitters that are designed to operate in front of a persons face, as in push-to-talk configurations, are tested for SAR compliance with the front of the device positioned to face the flat phantom. For devices that are carried next to the body such as a shoulder, waist or chest-worn transmitters, SAR compliance is tested with the accessory(ies), Including headsets and microphones, attached to the device and positioned against a flat phantom in a normal use configuration. In all cases SAR measurements are performed to investigate the worst-case positioning. Worst case positioning is then documented and used to perform Body SAR testing. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 19 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 9.2 Hand-held to Face device A typical example of a front-of-face device is a two-way radio that is held at a distance from the face of the user when transmitting. In these cases the device under test shall be positioned at the distance to the phantom surface that corresponds to the intended use as specified by the manufacturer in the user instructions. If the intended use is not specified, a separation distance of 25 mm5 between the phantom surface and the device shall be used. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 20 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 10. RF Exposure Limits HUMAN EXPOSURE SPATIAL PEAK SAR *
(Brain) SPATIAL AVERAGE SAR **
(Whole Body) SPATIAL PEAK SAR ***
(Hands / Feet / Ankle / Wrist) UNCONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT General Population
(W/kg) or (mW/g) CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT Occupational
(W/kg) or (mW/g) 1.60 0.08 4.00 8.00 0.40 20.00 Table 8.1 Safety Limits for Partial Body Exposure NOTES:
* The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 1 g of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and over the appropriate averaging time.
** The Spatial Average value of the SAR averaged over the whole-body.
*** The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 10 g of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and over the appropriate averaging time. Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be mad fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity. Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by persons who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e.as a result of employment or occupation). In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 21 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 11. System Verification 11.1 Tissue Verification The Head /body simulating material is calibrated by HCT using the DAKS 3.5 to determine the conductivity and permittivity. Table for Head Tissue Verification Date of Tests Tissue Temp.
(C) Tissue Type Freq.
() Measured Conductivity
(S/m) Measured Dielectric Constant, Target Target Conductivity
(S/m) Dielectric Constant,
% dev % dev 430 0.870 44.835 0.870 43.740 0.00% 2.50%
07/22/2019 20.1 450H 450 0.898 44.424 0.870 43.500 3.22%
2.12%
500 0.896 44.424 0.874 43.240 2.52% 2.74%
Table for Body Tissue Verification Date of Tests Tissue Temp.
(C) Tissue Type Freq.
() Measured Conductivity
(S/m) Measured Dielectric Constant, Target Target Conductivity
(S/m) Dielectric Constant,
% dev % dev 430 0.913 55.467 0.937 56.900
-2.56% -2.52%
07/24/2019 19.9 450B 450 0.930 54.742 0.940 56.700
-1.06% -3.45%
500 0.928 54.742 0.944 56.510
-1.69% -3.13%
F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 22 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 11.2 System Verification Prior to assessment, the system is verified to the 10 % of the specifications at 450 by using the system Verification kit. (Graphic Plots Attached)
* Input Power: 50 mW Freq.
[]
Date Probe
(S/N) Dipole
(S/N) Liquid 1 W Target 50mW 1 W Amb. Temp. Liquid Temp.
[C]
[C]
SAR1g Measured Normalized Deviation
(SPEAG) SAR1g SAR1g
[%]
Limit
[%]
[W/kg]
[W/kg]
[W/kg]
450 07/22/2019 3797 1007 Head 20.3 20.1 4.85 0.231 4.62
- 4.74 10 450 07/24/2019 3797 1007 Body 20.2 19.9 4.81 0.249 4.98
+ 3.53 10 11.3 System Verification Procedure SAR measurement was prior to assessment, the system is verified to the 10 % of the specifications at each frequency band by using the system verification kit. (Graphic Plots Attached)
- Cabling the system, using the verification kit equipment.
- Generate about 50 mW Input level from the signal generator to the Dipole Antenna.
- Dipole antenna was placed below the flat phantom.
- The measured one-gram SAR at the surface of the phantom above the dipole feed-point should be within 10 % of the target reference value.
- The results are normalized to 1 W input power. Note;
SAR Verification was performed according to the FCC KDB 865664 D01v01r04. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 23 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 12. SAR Test Data Summary 12.1 Hand-held to Face SAR Results Frequency Ch. Tune-Up Limit Conducted Power Power Drift Battery Antenna Separatio n Distance Measured SAR 50% Duty Reported SAR Plot No. 406.15 406.15 438.05 406.15 454.05 469.95 454.05 469.95 454.05 454.05 454.05 454.05 454.05 454.05 1 1 3 1 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 37.2 36.60
-0.28 KNB-69L KRA-23M3 25 4.03 2.015 2.47 37.2 36.60
-0.35 KNB-69L KRA-27M3 25 6.38 3.190 3.97 37.2 36.34
-0.40 KNB-69L KRA-27M3 25 4.05 2.025 2.71 37.2 36.60
-0.44 KNB-69L KRA-42M3 25 3.18 1.590 2.02 37.2 36.35
-0.50 KNB-69L KRA-23M 25 6.72 3.360 4.58 37.2 36.33
-0.47 KNB-69L KRA-23M 25 6.26 3.130 4.26 37.2 36.35
-0.43 KNB-69L KRA-27M 25 5.46 2.730 3.67 37.2 36.33
-0.40 KNB-69L KRA-27M 25 5.88 2.940 3.94 37.2 36.35
-0.43 KNB-69L KRA-42M 25 4.52 2.260 3.03 37.2 36.35
-0.50 KNB-45L KRA-23M 25 6.24 3.120 4.26 37.2 36.35
-0.99 KNB-53N KRA-23M 25 5.61 2.805 4.28 37.2 36.35
-0.54 KNB-29N KRA-23M 25 6.94 3.470 4.78 37.2 36.35
-0.40 KNB-82LC KRA-23M 25 5.91 2.955 3.94 37.2 36.35
-0.48 KNB-29N KRA-23M 25 0.043 0.022 0.03 ANSI/ IEEE C95.1 - 2005 Safety Limit Spatial Peak Controlled Exposure/ Occupational Head 8 W/kg (mW/g) Averaged over 1 gram
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
*
* Note : KMC-48GPS F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 24 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 12.2 Body-worn Belt clip SAR Results Frequency Ch. Tune-Up Limit Conducted Power Power Drift Battery Antenna Separation Distance Measured SAR 50% Duty Reported SAR Plot No. 406.15 438.05 406.15 438.05 406.15 454.05 469.95 454.05 469.95 454.05 469.95 454.05 454.05 454.05 454.05 454.05 1 3 1 3 1 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 37.2 36.60
-0.46 KNB-45L KRA-23M3 37.2 36.34
-0.69 KNB-45L KRA-23M3 37.2 36.60
-0.34 KNB-45L KRA-27M3 37.2 36.34
-0.65 KNB-45L KRA-27M3 37.2 36.60
-0.47 KNB-45L KRA-42M3 37.2 36.35
-0.59 KNB-45L KRA-23M 37.2 36.33
-0.48 KNB-45L KRA-23M 37.2 36.35
-0.70 KNB-45L KRA-27M 37.2 36.33
-0.43 KNB-45L KRA-27M 37.2 36.35
-0.41 KNB-45L KRA-42M 37.2 36.33
-0.59 KNB-45L KRA-42M 37.2 36.35
-0.41 KNB-69L KRA-23M 37.2 36.35
-0.76 KNB-53N KRA-23M 37.2 36.35
-0.58 KNB-29N KRA-23M 37.2 36.35
-0.45 KNB-82LC KRA-23M 37.2 36.35
-0.04 KNB-45L KRA-23M ANSI/ IEEE C95.1 - 2005 Safety Limit Spatial Peak Controlled Exposure/ Occupational
* Note : KMC-48GPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.61 2.805 3.58 6.62 3.310 4.73 8.09 4.045 5.02 5.52 2.760 3.91 4.52 2.260 2.89
-
-
-
-
-
9.79 4.895 6.82 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
*
8.08 4.040 5.51 7.33 3.665 5.24 7.38 3.690 4.98 5.92 2.960 3.96 2.94 1.470 2.06 8.69 4.345 5.81 8.08 4.040 5.85 8.56 4.280 5.95 7.93 3.965 5.35 0.041 0.021 0.03 Body 8 W/kg (mW/g) Averaged over 1 gram F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 25 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 12.3 SAR Test Notes General Notes:
1. The test data reported are the worst-case SAR values according to test procedures specified in IEEE 1528-2013, FCC KDB Procedure. 2. Batteries are fully charged at the beginning of the SAR measurements. A standard battery was used for all SAR measurements. Liquid tissue depth was at least 15.0 cm for all frequencies. 3. 4. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units. 5. SAR results were scaled to the maximum allowed power to demonstrate compliance per FCC KDB 447498 D01v06. 6. Test signal call mode is Manual test cord. 7. The EUT was tested for face-held SAR with a 2.5 cm separation distance between the front of the EUT and the outer surface of the planer phantom 8. The Body-worn SAR evaluation was performed with the Balt-clip body-worn accessory attached to the DUT and touching the outer surface of the planar phantom. 9. The adjusted SAR value was calculated by first scaling the SAR value up by the drift. This value was then scaled up based on the difference of the upper end the tolerance (37.782 dBm) and the measured conducted power. The resultant value is then multiplied by 0.5 to give the SAR value at 50% duty cycle. 10. SAR results were scaled to the maximum allowed power to demonstrate compliance per FCC KDB 447498 D01v06. Test Procedures applied in accordance with FCC KDB 643646 D01v01r03. 11. Measurement was reduced per KDB 643646 D01v01r03. 12. When the SAR for all antennas tested using the default battery is 3.5 W/kg, testing of all other required channels is not necessary. 13. When the SAR of an antenna tested on the highest output power using the default battery is >3.5 W/Kg and 4.0 W/Kg, testing of the immediately adjacent channel(s) is not necessary, but testing of other required channels may still be required. 14. When the SAR for all antennas tested using the default battery 4.0 W/kg, test additional batteries using the antenna and channel configuration that resulted in the highest SAR. 15. When the SAR of an antenna tested on the highest output power channel using the default battery is > 4.0 W/kg and 6.0 W/kg, testing of the required immediately adjacent channel(s) is necessary. For the remaining channels that cannot be excluded, this rule may be applied recursively with respect to the highest output power channel among the remaining channels. 16. Based on the SAR measured in the body-worn test sequence with default audio accessory, if the SAR for the antenna, body-worn accessory and battery combination(s) applicable to an audio accessory is/are >4.0 W/kg and <6.0 W/kg, test that audio accessory using the highest body-worn SAR combination (antenna, battery and body-worn accessory) and channel configuration previously identified that is applicable to the audio accessory. 17. When the SAR of an antenna tested is > 6.0 W/kg, test that battery and antenna combination with 18. the default body-worn and audio accessory on the required immediately adjacent channels. If the SAR measured >7.0 W/kg, test that battery, antenna, body-worn and audio accessory combination on all required channels. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 26 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 13. Measurement Uncertainty The measured SAR was <1.5 W/Kg for 1g SAR and <3.75 W/Kg For 10g SAR for all frequency bands. Therefore, per KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04,the extended measurement uncertainty analysis per IEEE1528-2013 was not required. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 27 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 14. SAR Test Equipment Manufacturer Type / Model S/N Calib. Date Calib.Interval Calib.Due SPEAG ELI Phantom HP SAR System Control PC
-
-
CS8Cspeag-TX60 F10/5D1CA1/C/01 TX60 XLspeag F10/5D1CA1/A/01 Teach Pendant (Joystick) S-0123 Light Alignment Sensor SE UKS 030 AA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A DAE4 E-Field Probe EX3DV4 Dipole D450V2 652 3797 1007 04/17/2019 Annual 04/17/2020 11/22/2018 Annual 11/22/2019 05/24/2019 Annual 05/24/2020 Staubli Staubli Staubli Staubli SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG Agilent Power Meter N1911A MY45101406 09/06/2018 Annual 09/06/2019 Agilent Power Sensor N1921A MY55220026 09/06/2018 Annual 09/06/2019 Agilent Agilent Agilent SPEAG Power Meter E4419B MY40511244 05/08/2019 Annual 05/08/2020 Power Sensor 8481A SG1091286 10/11/2018 Annual 10/11/2019 Power Sensor 8481A MY41090873 10/11/2018 Annual 10/11/2019 DAK-12 1026 04/16/2019 Annual 04/16/2020 Agilent Signal Generator N5182A MY47070230 05/08/2019 Annual 05/08/2020 Agilent 11636B/Power Divider 58698 02/28/2019 Annual 03/06/2020 TESTO 175-H1/Thermometer 40331936309 01/29/2019 Annual 01/29/2020 EMPOWER RF Power Amplifier MICRO LAB LP Filter / LA-15N MICRO LAB LP Filter / LA-30N 1084 10453
-
07/03/2019 Annual 07/03/2020 10/11/2018 Annual 10/11/2019 10/11/2018 Annual 10/11/2019 WEINSCHEL 30dB Attenuator CE6106 11/20/2018 Annual 11/20/2019 Apitech Attenuator (3dB) 18B-03 1 06/04/2019 Annual 06/04/2020 Agilent Attenuator (20dB) 33340C 1642 05/08/2019 Annual 05/08/2020 Agilent Directional Bridge 3140A03878 06/12/2019 Annual 06/12/2020 HP Network Analyzer 8753ES JP39240221 01/28/2019 Annual 01/28/2020 Agilent MXA Signal Analyzer N9020A MY50510407 10/31/2018 Annual 10/31/2019 1. The E-field probe was calibrated by SPEAG, by the waveguide technique procedure. Dipole Verification measurement is performed by HCT Lab. before each test. The brain/body simulating material is calibrated by HCT using the DAK-12 to determine the conductivity and permittivity (dielectric constant) of the brain/body-equivalent material. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 28 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 15. Conclusion The SAR measurement indicates that the EUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2005. These measurements are taken to simulate the RF effects exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise laboratory measures were taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The SAR measurement indicates that the EUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC and Industry Canada. These measurements were taken to simulate the RF effects of RF exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise laboratory measures were taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The results and statements relate only to the item(s) tested. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 29 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 16. References
[1] Federal Communications Commission, ET Docket 93-62, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radio frequency Radiation, Aug. 1996.
[2] ANSI/IEEE C95.1 - 2005 , American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 300 kHz to 300 GHz, New York: IEEE, Sept. 1992
[3] ANSI/IEEE C 95.1 - 2005, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, New York: IEEE, 2006
[4 ANSI/IEEE C95.3 - 2002, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave, New York: December 2002.
[5] IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 34 IEEE Std. 1528-2013, IEEE Recommended Practice or Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Body from Wireless Communications Devices
[6] NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. Reprinted Feb. 1995.
[7] T. Schmid, O. Egger, N. Kuster, Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, Jan. 1996, pp. 105-113.
[8] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, N. Kuster, Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies, ICECOM97, Oct. 1997, pp. 120-124.
[9] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, E-field Probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids, Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, June 23-25, 1996, pp. 172-175.
[10] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, Application Note: Data Storage and Evaluation, June 1998, p2.
[11] V. Hombach, K. Meier, M. Burkhardt, E. Kuhn, N. Kuster, The Dependence of EM Energy Absorption upon Human Head Modeling at 900 , IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44 no. 10, Oct. 1996, pp. 1865-1873.
[12] N. Kuster and Q. Balzano, Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300 , IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 17-23.
[13] G. Hartsgrove, A. Kraszewski, A. Surowiec, Simulated Biological Materials for Electromagnetic Radiation Absorption Studies, University of Ottawa, Bioelectro magnetics, Canada: 1987, pp. 29-36.
[14] Q. Balzano, O. Garay, T. Manning Jr., Electromagnetic Energy Exposure of Simulated Users of Portable Cellular Telephones, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 44, no.3, Aug. 1995.
[15] W. Gander, Computer mathematick, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 30 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002
[16] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[17] N. Kuster, R. Kastle, T. Schmid, Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, May 1997, pp. 645-652.
[18] CENELEC CLC/SC111B, European Prestandard (prENV 50166-2), Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields High-frequency: 10 kHz-300 GHz, Jan. 1995.
[19] Prof. Dr. Niels Kuster, ETH, Eidgenssische Technische Hoschschule Zrich, Dosimetric Evaluation of the Cellular Phone.
[20] IEC 62209-1, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices Human models, instrumentation and procedures Part 1:Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for hand-held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300 to 3 GHz), July. 2016..
[21] IEC 62209-2, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices Human models, instrumentation, and procedures Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 to 6 GHz) Mar. 2010.
[22] Industry Canada RSS-102 Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radio Communication Apparatus (All Frequency Band) Issue 5, March 2015.
[23] Health Canada Safety Code 6 Limits of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Rage from 3 kHz 300 GHz, 2009
[24] FCC SAR Test procedures for 2G-3G Devices, Mobile Hotspot and UMPC Device KDB 941225 D01.
[25] SAR Measurement Guidance for IEEE 802.11 transmitters, KDB 248227 D01v02r02
[26] SAR Evaluation of Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas KDB 648474 D03, D04.
[27] SAR Evaluation for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet computers KDB 616217 D04.
[28] SAR Measurement and Reporting Requirements for 100 6 GHz, KDB 865664 D01, D02.
[29] FCC General RF Exposure Guidance and SAR procedures for Dongles, KDB 447498 D01,D02. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 31 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Attachment 1. SAR Test Plots F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 32 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Test Laboratory:
EUT Type:
Liquid Temperature:
Ambient Temperature:
Test Date:
Plot No.:
HCT CO., LTD UHF TRANSCEIVER 20.1 20.3 07/22/2019 1 Communication System: UID 0, 400MHz FCC 2 (0); Frequency: 454.05 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 455 MHz; = 0.906 S/m; r = 44.327; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:
Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3797; ConvF(10.22, 10.22, 10.22) @ 454.05 MHz; Calibrated: 2018-11-22 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn652; Calibrated: 2019-04-17 Phantom: ELI v4.0 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8);
Hand-held to Face 4ch KNB-29N_KRA-23M/Area Scan (7x16x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 8.35 W/kg Hand-held to Face 4ch KNB-29N_KRA-23M/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 96.88 V/m; Power Drift = -0.54 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 9.37 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 6.94 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.1 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 8.25 W/kg 0 dB = 8.35 W/kg = 9.21 dBW/kg F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 33 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Test Laboratory:
EUT Type:
Liquid Temperature:
Ambient Temperature:
Test Date:
Plot No.:
HCT CO., LTD UHF TRANSCEIVER 20.1 20.3 07/22/2019 2 Communication System: UID 0, 400MHz FCC2 (0); Frequency: 454.05 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 455 MHz; = 0.931 S/m; r = 54.629; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:
Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3797; ConvF(10.35, 10.35, 10.35) @ 454.05 MHz; Calibrated: 2018-11-22 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn652; Calibrated: 2019-04-17 Phantom: ELI v4.0 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8);
Body-worn Belt clip 4ch KNB-45L_KRA-23M/Area Scan (7x16x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 12.1 W/kg Body-worn Belt clip 4ch KNB-45L_KRA-23M/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 117.4 V/m; Power Drift = -0.59 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 14.1 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 9.79 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 7 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 11.8 W/kg 0 dB = 11.8 W/kg = 10.72 dBW/kg F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 34 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Attachment 2. Dipole Verification Plots F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 35 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Verification Data (450 Head) Test Laboratory:
Input Power Liquid Temp:
Test Date:
HCT CO., LTD 50 20.1 07/22/2019 DUT: Dipole 450 MHz ; Type: D450V2 Communication System: UID 0, CW (0); Frequency: 450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 450 MHz; = 0.898 S/m; r = 44.424; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:
Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3797; ConvF(10.22, 10.22, 10.22) @ 450 MHz; Calibrated: 2018-11-22 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn652; Calibrated: 2019-04-17 Phantom: ELI v4.0 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8);
450MHz Verification/Area Scan (9x21x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.291 W/kg 450MHz Verification/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 18.33 V/m; Power Drift = -0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.343 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.231 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.156 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.290 W/kg 0 dB = 0.290 W/kg = -5.38 dBW/kg F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 36 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Verification Data (450 Body) Test Laboratory:
Input Power Liquid Temp:
Test Date:
HCT CO., LTD 50 19.9 07/24/2019 DUT: Dipole 450 MHz; Type: D450V2 Communication System: UID 0, CW (0); Frequency: 450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 450 MHz; = 0.93 S/m; r = 54.742; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:
Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3797; ConvF(10.35, 10.35, 10.35) @ 450 MHz; Calibrated: 2018-11-22 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn652; Calibrated: 2019-04-17 Phantom: ELI v4.0 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8);
450MHz Verification/Area Scan (9x21x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.314 W/kg 450MHz Verification/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 18.52 V/m; Power Drift = 0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.382 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.249 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.167 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.317 W/kg 0 dB = 0.317 W/kg = -4.99 dBW/kg F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 37 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Attachment 3. SAR Tissue Characterization The brain and muscle mixtures consist of a viscous gel using hydrox-ethyl cellulose (HEC) gelling agent and saline solution (see Table 3.1). Preservation with a bacteriacide is added and visual inspection is made to make sure air bubbles are not trapped during the mixing process. The mixture is calibrated to obtain proper dielectric constant (permittivity) and conductivity of the desired tissue. The mixture characterizations used for the brain and muscle tissue simulating liquids are according to the data by C. Gabriel and G. Harts grove. Ingredients
(% by weight) Tissue Type Water Salt (NaCl) Sugar HEC Bactericide Triton X-100 DGBE Diethylene glycol hexyl ether Salt:
Water:
DGBE:
Frequency () 450 Head 38.91 %
3.79 %
56.93 %
0.25 %
0.12 %
-
-
-
Body 46.21 %
2.34 %
51.17 %
0.18 %
0.08 %
-
-
-
99 % Pure Sodium Chloride Sugar:
98 % Pure Sucrose De-ionized, 16M resistivity HEC:
Hydroxyethyl Cellulose 99 % Di(ethylene glycol) butyl ether,[2-(2-butoxyethoxy) ethanol]
Triton X-100(ultra-pure):
Polyethylene glycol mono[4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl] ether Composition of the Tissue Equivalent Matter F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 38 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Attachment 4. SAR System Validation Per FCC KCB 865664 D02v01r02, SAR system validation status should be document to confirm measurement accuracy. The SAR systems (including SAR probes, system components and software versions) used for this device were validated against its performance specifications prior to the SAR measurements. Reference dipoles were used with the required tissue- equivalent media for system validation, according to the procedures outlined in IEEE 1528-2013 and FCC KDB 865664 D01v01r04. Since SAR probe calibrations are frequency dependent, each probe calibration point was validated at a frequency within the valid frequency range of the probe calibration point, using the system that normally operates with the probe for routine SAR measurements and according to the required tissue-equivalent media. A tabulated summary of the system validation status including the validation date(s), measurement frequencies, SAR probes and tissue dielectric parameters has been included. SAR System Probe No. 3 3 Probe Type Probe Calibration Dipole Date Point Dielectric Parameters CW Validation Modulation Validation Measured Permittivity Measured Conductivity Sensitivity Probe Linearity Probe Isotro py MOD. Type Duty Factor PAR 3797 EX3DV4 Head 450 1007 2019-6-03 43.7 0.85 PASS PASS PASS N/A N/A N/A 3797 EX3DV4 Body 450 1007 2019-6-03 56.8 0.95 PASS PASS PASS N/A N/A N/A SAR System Validation Summary 1g Note;
All measurement were performed using probes calibrated for CW signal only. Modulations in the table above represent test configurations for which the measurement system has been validated per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04. SAR system were validated for modulated signals with a periodic duty cycle, such as GMSK, or with a high peak to average ratio (>5 dB), such as OFDM according to KDB 865664 D01v01r04. F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 39 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Attachment 5. Probe Calibration Data F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 40 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 41 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 42 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 43 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 44 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 45 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 46 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 47 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 48 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 49 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 50 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 51 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 52 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 53 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 54 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 55 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 56 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 57 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 58 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 59 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 60 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 61 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 62 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 63 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 64 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 65 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 66 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 67 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 68 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 69 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 70 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 71 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 72 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 73 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 74 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 75 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 76 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 77 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 78 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 79 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 Attachment 6. Dipole Calibration Data F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 80 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 81 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 82 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 83 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 84 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 85 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 86 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 87 of 88 Report No. HCT-SR-1908-FC002 F-TP22-03 (Rev. 01) Page 88 of 88
This product uses the FCC Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the FCC