submitted | available | document details (if available) | source link |
---|---|---|---|
August 09 2017 | December 09 2017 |
various | RF Exposure Info | RF Exposure Info | 3.07 MiB | August 09 2017 / December 09 2017 |
PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. 382 Piercy Rd, San Jose, CA 95138 USA Tel. +1.410.290.6652 / Fax +1.410.290.6654 http://www.pctest.com SAR EVALUATION REPORT Date of Testing:
07/17/17 07/27/17 Test Site/Location:
PCTEST Lab, San Jose, CA, USA Document Serial No.:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Applicant Name:
Apple, Inc. 1 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014 FCC ID:
APPLICANT:
DUT Type:
Application Type:
FCC Rule Part(s):
Model:
Additional Model:
BCG-A1858 APPLE, INC. Watch Certification CFR 2.1093 A1858 A1959 Note: This revised Test Report (S/N: 1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG) supersedes and replaces the previously issued test report on the same subject device for the same type of testing as indicated. Please discard or destroy the previously issued test report(s) and dispose of it accordingly. This watch has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in Section 1.7 of this report. I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. Test results reported herein relate only to the item(s) tested. The SAR Tick is an initiative of the Mobile Manufacturers Forum (MMF). While a product may be considered eligible, use of the SAR Tick logo requires an agreement with the MMF. Further details can be obtained by emailing: sartick@mmfai.info. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 1 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 1 gm Head (W/kg)10 gm Extremity (W/kg)DTS2.4 GHz WLAN2412 - 2472 MHz0.17< 0.1DSS/DTSBluetooth2402 - 2480 MHz< 0.1Band & ModeTx FrequencyEquipment Class0.12SAR T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S DEVICE UNDER TEST .................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................5 DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................6 TEST CONFIGURATION POSITIONS FOR WRIST-WORN DEVICES .......................................................7 RF EXPOSURE LIMITS ................................................................................................................................8 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................9 RF CONDUCTED POWERS ...................................................................................................................... 10 SYSTEM VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 12 SAR DATA SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 14 SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY ........................................................................................................ 17 EQUIPMENT LIST ...................................................................................................................................... 18 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES.......................................................................................................... 19 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 20 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 APPENDIX A:
APPENDIX B:
APPENDIX C:
APPENDIX D:
SAR TEST PLOTS SAR DIPOLE VERIFICATION PLOTS PROBE AND DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES SAR TISSUE SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX E:
SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION APPENDIX F:
DUT ANTENNA DIAGRAM & SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 2 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 1 D E V I C E U N D E R T E S T 1.1 Device Overview Table 1-1 Summary EUT Bands/Modes This device does not support network based voice services. Head SAR was evaluated to address VoIP operations per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D010v06. 1.2 Power Reduction for SAR There is no power reduction used for any band/mode implemented in this device for SAR purposes. 1.3 Maximum Output Power Specifications This device operates using the following maximum output power specifications. SAR values were scaled to the maximum allowed power to determine compliance per KDB Publication 447498 D01v06. Summary Max Conducted Powers WIFI Mode Table 1-2 FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 3 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 2.4 GHz WLANData2412 - 2472 MHzBluetoothData2402 - 2480 MHzNFCData13.56 MHzBand & ModeOperating ModesTx FrequencyCh.1Ch.2-10Ch. 11Ch. 12Ch. 13Maximum19.019.519.519.518.0Maximum17.519.517.515.58.0Maximum17.519.517.515.58.0IEEE 802.11n (2.4 GHz)Mode / BandModulated Average (dBm)IEEE 802.11b (2.4 GHz)IEEE 802.11g (2.4 GHz) Summary Max Conducted Powers Bluetooth Mode Table 1-3 1.4 DUT Antenna Locations A diagram showing the location of the device antennas can be found in Appendix F. 1.5 Near Field Communications (NFC) Antenna This DUT has NFC operations. The NFC antenna is integrated into the device for this model. Therefore, all SAR tests were performed with the device which already incorporates the NFC antenna. A diagram showing the location of the NFC antenna can be found in Appendix F. 1.6 Simultaneous Transmission Capabilities This device does not support any simultaneous transmission scenarios. 1.7 Guidance Applied FCC KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 (SAR Considerations for 802.11 Devices) FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 (General SAR Guidance, Wrist-worn Device Guidance) FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, D02v01r02 (SAR Measurements up to 6 GHz) 1.8 Device Serial Numbers Several samples with identical hardware were used to support SAR testing. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units. The serial numbers used for each test are indicated alongside the results in Section 9. 1.9 Housing Type and Wrist Band Types Only one housing type, aluminum, is available for this model. The device can be used with different wrist band accessories. All metallic wrist bands were tested, and the sport band non-metallic wrist band was tested fully for all required exposure conditions. Other non-metallic wrist bands were checked to be similar or lower in SAR. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 4 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 MaximumMaximumMaximumBluetooth EDR (iPA)MaximumBluetooth BDR/LE (iPA)13.0Bluetooth EDR (ePA)13.59.0Bluetooth BDR/LE (ePA)19.0Mode / BandModulated Average (dBm) 2 I N T R O D U C T I O N The FCC and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada have adopted the guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radio frequency (RF) radiation in ET Docket 93-62 on Aug. 6, 1996 and Health Canada Safety Code 6 to protect the public and workers from the potential hazards of RF emissions due to FCC-regulated portable devices. [1]
The safety limits used for the environmental evaluation measurements are based on the criteria published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) in IEEE/ANSI C95.1-
1992 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz [3] and Health Canada RF Exposure Guidelines Safety Code 6 [22]. The measurement procedure described in IEEE/ANSI C95.3-2002 Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave [4] is used for guidance in measuring the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) due to the RF radiation exposure from the Equipment Under Test (EUT). These criteria for SAR evaluation are similar to those recommended by the International Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, Report No. Vol 74. SAR is a measure of the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting source. SAR values have been related to threshold levels for potential biological hazards. 2.1 SAR Definition Specific Absorption Rate is defined as the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dU) absorbed by
(dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dV) of a given density (). It is also defined as the rate of RF energy absorption per unit mass at a point in an absorbing body (see Equation 2-1). Equation 2-1 SAR Mathematical Equation SAR is expressed in units of Watts per Kilogram (W/kg). where:
= conductivity of the tissue-simulating material (S/m) E = Total RMS electric field strength (V/m)
= mass density of the tissue-simulating material (kg/m3) NOTE: The primary factors that control rate of energy absorption were found to be the wavelength of the incident field in relation to the dimensions and geometry of the irradiated organism, the orientation of the organism in relation to the polarity of field vectors, the presence of reflecting surfaces, and whether conductive contact is made by the organism with a ground plane.[6]
FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 5 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 SARddtdUdmddtdUdv2ESAR 3 D O S I M E T R I C A S S E S S M E N T 3.1 Measurement Procedure The evaluation was performed using the following procedure compliant to FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04:
1. The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head or body was measured at a distance no greater than 5.0 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the device-head and body interface and the horizontal grid resolution was determined per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 (See Table 3-1. 2. The point SAR measurement was taken at the maximum SAR region determined from Step 1 to enable the monitoring of SAR fluctuations/drifts during the 1g/10g cube evaluation. SAR at this fixed point was measured and used as a reference value. 3. Based on the area scan data, the peak of the region with maximum SAR Figure 3-1 Sample SAR Area Scan was determined by spline interpolation. Around this point, a volume was assessed according to the measurement resolution and volume size requirements of FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 (See Table 3-1). On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated with the following procedure (see references or the DASY manual online for more details):
a. SAR values at the inner surface of the phantom are extrapolated from the measured values along the line away from the surface with spacing no greater than that in Table 3-1. The extrapolation was based on a least-squares algorithm. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in the z-axis
(normal to the phantom shell). b. After the maximum interpolated values were calculated between the points in the cube, the SAR was averaged over the spatial volume (1g or 10g) using a 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-spline is composed of three one-dimensional splines with the Not a knot condition (in x, y, and z directions). The volume was then integrated with the trapezoidal algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were obtained through interpolation, in order to calculate the averaged SAR. c. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. 4. The SAR reference value, at the same location as step 2, was re-measured after the zoom scan was complete to calculate the SAR drift. If the drift deviated by more than 5%, the SAR test and drift measurements were repeated. Area and Zoom Scan Resolutions per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 Table 3-1 FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 6 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 Uniform Gridzzoom(n)zzoom(1)*zzoom(n>1)* 2 GHz 15 8 5 4 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 302-3 GHz 12 5 5 4 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 303-4 GHz 12 5 4 3 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 284-5 GHz 10 4 3 2.5 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 255-6 GHz 10 4 2 2 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 22Minimum Zoom Scan Volume (mm)(x,y,z)Maximum Zoom Scan Spatial Resolution (mm)Graded GridFrequencyMaximum Area Scan Resolution (mm)(xarea, yarea)Maximum Zoom Scan Resolution (mm)(xzoom, yzoom) 4 T E S T C O N F I G U R A T I O N P O S I T I O N S F O R W R I S T - W O R N D E V I C E S 4.1 Device Holder The device holder is made out of low-loss POM material having the following dielectric parameters: relative permittivity = 3 and loss tangent = 0.02. Additionally, a manufacturer provided low-loss foam was used to position the device for head SAR evaluations. 4.2 Positioning for Head Devices that are designed to be worn on the wrist may operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. When next-to-mouth SAR evaluation is required, the device is positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The device is evaluated with wrist bands strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 4.3 Extremity Exposure Configurations Devices that are designed or intended for use on extremities or mainly operated in extremity only exposure conditions; i.e., hands, wrists, feet and ankles, may require extremity SAR evaluation. When the device also operates in close proximity to the users body, SAR compliance for the body is also required. When extremity SAR evaluation is required, the device is evaluated with the back of the device touching the flat phantom, which is filled with body tissue-equivalent medium. The device was evaluated with Sport wrist band unstrapped and touching the phantom. For Metal Loop and Metal Links wrist bands, the device was evaluated with wrist bands strapped and the distance between wrist bands and the phantom was minimized to represent the spacing created by actual use conditions. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 7 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 5 R F E X P O S U R E L I M I T S 5.1 Uncontrolled Environment UNCONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity. 5.2 Controlled Environment CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by persons who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. SAR Human Exposure Specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and Health Canada Safety Code 6 Table 5-1 1. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and over 2. The Spatial Average value of the SAR averaged over the whole body. 3. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and the appropriate averaging time. over the appropriate averaging time. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 8 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 6 F C C M E AS U R E M E N T P R O C E D U R E S 6.1 Measured and Reported SAR Per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06, when SAR is not measured at the maximum power level allowed for production units, the results must be scaled to the maximum tune-up tolerance limit according to the power applied to the individual channels tested to determine compliance. When SAR is measured at or scaled to the maximum tune-up tolerance limit, the results are referred to as reported SAR. The highest reported SAR results are identified on the grant of equipment authorization according to procedures in KDB 690783 D01v01r03. 6.2 SAR Testing with 802.11 Transmitters The normal network operating configurations of 802.11 transmitters are not suitable for SAR measurements. Unpredictable fluctuations in network traffic and antenna diversity conditions can introduce undesirable variations in SAR results. The SAR for these devices should be measured using chipset based test mode software to ensure the results are consistent and reliable. See KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for more details. 6.2.1 General Device Setup Chipset based test mode software is hardware dependent and generally varies among manufacturers. The device operating parameters established in test mode for SAR measurements must be identical to those programmed in production units, including output power levels, amplifier gain settings and other RF performance tuning parameters. A periodic duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. The reported SAR is scaled to 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. 6.2.2 2.4 GHz SAR Test Requirements SAR is measured for 2.4 GHz 802.11b DSSS using either the fixed test position or, when applicable, the initial test position procedure. SAR test reduction is determined according to the following:
1) When the reported SAR of the highest measured maximum output power channel for the exposure 2) configuration is 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required for 802.11b DSSS in that exposure configuration. When the reported SAR is > 0.8 W/kg, SAR is required for that position using the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel; i.e., all channels require testing. 2.4 GHz 802.11 g/n OFDM are additionally evaluated for SAR if the highest reported SAR for 802.11b, adjusted by the ratio of the OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power, is > 1.2 W/kg. When SAR is required for OFDM modes in 2.4 GHz band, the Initial Test Configuration Procedures should be followed. When 10-g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 9 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 7 R F C O N D U C T E D P O W E R S 7.1 WLAN Conducted Powers Table 7-1 2.4GHz WLAN Average RF Power Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02:
Power measurements were performed for the transmission mode configuration with the highest maximum output power specified for production units. For transmission modes with the same maximum output power specification, powers were measured for the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation and lowest data rate. For transmission modes with identical maximum specified output power, channel bandwidth, modulation and data rates, power measurements were required for all identical configurations. For each transmission mode configuration, powers were measured for the highest and lowest channels;
and at the mid-band channel(s) when there were at least 3 channels supported. For configurations with multiple mid-band channels, due to an even number of channels, both channels were measured. The bolded data rate and channel above were tested for SAR. Figure 7-1 Power Measurement Setup FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 10 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 802.11b802.11g802.11n19.0017.5017.4419.0718.9618.7619.5019.4819.4324571019.3318.9519.2519.4017.4917.35246211243762.4GHz Conducted Power [dBm]Freq [MHz]ChannelIEEE Transmission Mode2412124172 7.2 Bluetooth Conducted Powers Table 7-2 Bluetooth Average RF Power Notes:
1. The bolded data rate and channel above were tested for SAR. 2. Bluetooth was evaluated with a test mode with 100% transmission duty factor. Figure 7-2 Power Measurement Setup FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 11 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017
[dBm][mW]2402GFSKePA018.2266.3742441GFSKePA3918.8777.0902480GFSKePA7818.6172.6112402GFSKiPA012.4617.6202441GFSKiPA3912.7418.7932480GFSKiPA7812.6418.36524028PSKePA013.3121.42924418PSKePA3913.5022.38724808PSKePA7813.2421.08624028PSKiPA08.717.43024418PSKiPA399.007.94324808PSKiPA788.677.362Frequency [MHz]ModulationChannel No.Avg Conducted PowerPower Scheme 8 S Y S T E M V E R I F I C A T I O N 8.1 Tissue Verification Table 8-1 Measured Tissue Properties The above measured tissue parameters were used in the DASY software. The DASY software was used to perform interpolation to determine the dielectric parameters at the SAR test device frequencies (per KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04. The tissue parameters listed in the SAR test plots may slightly differ from the table above due to significant digit rounding in the software. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 12 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 Calibrated for Tests Performed on:Tissue TypeTissue Temp During Calibration (C)Measured Frequency (MHz)Measured Conductivity, (S/m)Measured Dielectric Constant, TARGET Conductivity, (S/m)TARGET Dielectric Constant, % dev % dev 24001.78040.6141.75639.2891.37%3.37%24501.84040.4211.80039.2002.22%3.11%25001.90640.2541.85539.1362.75%2.86%24001.78039.2691.75639.2891.37%-0.05%24501.87239.0001.80039.2004.00%-0.51%25001.89138.9111.85539.1361.94%-0.57%24001.96152.6841.90252.7673.10%-0.16%24502.03252.4891.95052.7004.21%-0.40%25002.10852.3302.02152.6364.30%-0.58%7/27/20172450H2450B7/17/201724.22450H7/17/201724.622.6 8.2 Test System Verification Prior to SAR assessment, the system is verified to 10% of the SAR measurement on the reference dipole at the time of calibration by the calibration facility. Full system validation status and result summary can be found in Appendix E. Table 8-2 System Verification Results - 1g Table 8-3 System Verification Results - 10g System Verification Setup Photo Figure 8-2 System Verification Setup Diagram Figure 8-1 FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 13 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 CAL12450HEAD07/17/201722.724.20.10092174205.15052.10051.500-1.15%CAL32450HEAD07/27/201722.822.80.10092131184.94052.10049.400-5.18%System VerificationTARGET & MEASURED SAR System #Tissue Frequency (MHz)Input Power (W)Measured SAR1g (W/kg)Deviation1g (%)1 W Normalized SAR1g (W/kg)Source SNTissue TypeProbe SNDate:Amb. Temp (C)Liquid Temp (C)1 W Target SAR1g (W/kg)CAL32450BODY07/17/201722.822.60.10092131182.49024.00024.9003.75%System VerificationTARGET & MEASURED SAR System #Tissue Frequency (MHz)Tissue TypeDate:Amb. Temp (C)Liquid Temp (C)Input Power (W)Source SNProbe SNMeasured SAR10g (W/kg)1 W Target SAR10g (W/kg)1 W Normalized SAR10g (W/kg)Deviation10g (%) 9 S AR D A T A S U M M A R Y 9.1 Standalone Head SAR Data Table 9-1 2.4 GHz WLAN Head SAR Table 9-2 Bluetooth (ePA) Head SAR Table 9-3 Bluetooth (iPA) Head SAR FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 14 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 SAR (1g)Reported SAR (1g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)24376802.11bDSSS22 AluminumMetal Loop19.5 19.50 0.1710 mmFH7TX0EPJ8801front98.20.0971.0001.0180.09924376802.11bDSSS22 AluminumMetal Links19.5 19.50 0.0610 mmFH7TX0EPJ8801front98.20.0901.0001.0180.09224172802.11bDSSS22 AluminumSport19.5 19.07 0.0410 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front98.20.1411.1041.0180.15824376802.11bDSSS22 AluminumSport19.5 19.50 -0.0710 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front98.20.1631.0001.0180.166A1246211802.11bDSSS22 AluminumSport19.5 19.40 0.1910 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front98.20.1561.0231.0180.162IEEE 802.11b#REF!-1.000-1.000-1.000Housing TypeWrist Band Type1.6 W/kg (mW/g)averaged over 1 gramUncontrolled Exposure/General PopulationPlot #ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITSpatial Peak HeadScaling Factor (Duty Cycle)Bandwidth [MHz]Data Rate (Mbps)Power Drift [dB]Device Serial NumberSideSpacingFREQUENCYConducted Power [dBm]ModeMEASUREMENT RESULTS ServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Duty Cycle (%)Scaling Factor (Power)SAR (1g)Reported SAR (1g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Loop 19.0 18.87 -0.0610 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front1:10.0841.0300.087244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Links19.0 18.87 -0.0610 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front1:10.0771.0300.079244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumSport19.0 18.87 -0.0310 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front1:10.1181.0300.122A2MEASUREMENT RESULTS FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Conducted Power [dBm]Power Drift [dB]SpacingDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)Spatial Peak 1.6 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 1 gramSideDuty CycleScaling FactorPlot #ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITHeadHousing TypeWrist Band TypeSAR (1g)Reported SAR (1g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Loop 13.0 12.74 0.1110 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front1:10.0221.0620.023244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Links13.0 12.74 0.1710 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front1:10.0201.0620.021244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumSport13.0 12.74 0.1010 mmFH7TXOH7J8801front1:10.0331.0620.035A3Spatial Peak 1.6 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 1 gramSideDuty CycleScaling FactorPlot #ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITHeadSpacingDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)MEASUREMENT RESULTS FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Conducted Power [dBm]Power Drift [dB]Housing TypeWrist Band Type 9.2 Standalone Extremity SAR Data Table 9-4 2.4 GHz WLAN Extremity SAR Table 9-5 Bluetooth (ePA) Extremity SAR Table 9-6 Bluetooth (iPA) Extremity SAR FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 15 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 SAR (10g)Reported SAR (10g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)24376802.11bDSSS22 AluminumMetal Loop19.5 19.50 -0.050 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back98.20.0201.0001.0180.02024376802.11bDSSS22 AluminumMetal Links19.5 19.50 -0.030 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back98.20.0221.0001.0180.02224172802.11bDSSS22 AluminumSport19.5 19.07 -0.050 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back98.20.0271.1041.0180.03024376802.11bDSSS22 AluminumSport19.5 19.50 0.060 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back98.20.0331.0001.0180.034A4246211802.11bDSSS22 AluminumSport19.5 19.40 -0.060 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back98.20.0301.0231.0180.031Spatial Peak 4.0 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 10 gramsSideDuty Cycle (%)Scaling Factor (Power)Plot #ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITExtremitySpacingDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)Housing TypeMEASUREMENT RESULTS FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Conducted Power [dBm]Power Drift [dB]Bandwidth [MHz]Scaling Factor (Duty Cycle)Wrist Band TypeSAR (10g)Reported SAR (10g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Loop19.0 18.87 -0.100 mmFH7TXOH7J8801back1:10.0201.0300.021244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Links19.0 18.87 0.050 mmFH7TXOH7J8801back1:10.0221.0300.023244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumSport19.0 18.87 0.020 mmFH7TXOH7J8801back1:10.0271.0300.028A5Spatial Peak 4.0 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 10 gramsSideDuty CycleScaling FactorPlot #ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITExtremitySpacingDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)MEASUREMENT RESULTS FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Conducted Power [dBm]Power Drift [dB]Housing TypeWrist Band TypeSAR (10g)Reported SAR (10g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Loop13.0 12.74 -0.140 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back1:10.0041.0620.004244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumMetal Links13.0 12.74 -0.080 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back1:10.0041.0620.004244139BluetoothFHSSAluminumSport13.0 12.74 -0.020 mmFH7TX0J8J8801back1:10.0061.0620.006A6Spatial Peak 4.0 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 10 gramsSideDuty CycleScaling FactorPlot #ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITExtremitySpacingDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)MEASUREMENT RESULTS FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Conducted Power [dBm]Power Drift [dB]Housing TypeWrist Band Type 9.3 SAR Test Notes General Notes:
1. The test data reported are the worst-case SAR values according to test procedures specified in FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06. 2. Batteries are fully charged at the beginning of the SAR measurements. 3. Liquid tissue depth was at least 15.0 cm for all frequencies. 4. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units. 5. SAR results were scaled to the maximum allowed power to demonstrate compliance per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06. 6. Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, variability SAR tests were not required since measured SAR results for all frequency bands were less than 0.8 W/kg for 1g SAR and 2.0 W/kg for 10g SAR. 7. Only one housing type, aluminum, is available for this model. The non-metallic wrist-band, sport band, was evaluated for all exposure conditions. The available metallic wrist accessories, metal links band and metal loop band, were additionally evaluated. 8. This device is a portable wrist-worn device and does not support any other use conditions. Therefore the procedures in FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 Section 6.2 have been applied for extremity and next to mouth (head) conditions. WLAN/Bluetooth Notes:
1. Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for 2.4 GHz WIFI operations, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. SAR for OFDM modes (2.4 GHz 802.11g/n) was not required due to the maximum allowed powers and the highest reported DSSS SAR. See Section 6.2.2 for more information. When the maximum reported 1g averaged SAR is 0.8 W/kg, SAR testing on additional channels was not required. Otherwise, SAR for the next highest output power channel was required until the reported SAR result was 1.20 W/kg or all test channels were measured. 2. When 10-g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above. 3. The device was configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools. The reported SAR was scaled to the 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance. Procedures used to measure the duty factor are identical to that in the associated EMC test reports. 4. To determine compliance, Bluetooth SAR was measured with internal power amplifier and external power amplifier. Bluetooth was evaluated with a test mode with 100% transmission duty factor. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 16 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 10 S AR M E AS U R E M E N T V AR I A B I L I T Y 10.1 Measurement Variability Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01, SAR measurement variability was not assessed for each frequency band since all measured SAR values are < 0.80 W/kg for 1g SAR and < 2.0 W/kg for 10g SAR. 10.2 Measurement Uncertainty The measured SAR was <1.5 W/kg for 1g SAR and <3.75 W/kg for 10g SAR for all frequency bands. Therefore, per KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, the extended measurement uncertainty analysis was not required. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 17 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 11 E Q U I P M E N T L I S T Note: CBT (Calibrated Before Testing). Prior to testing, the measurement paths containing a cable, amplifier, attenuator, coupler or filter were connected to a calibrated source (i.e. a signal generator) to determine the losses of the measurement path. The power meter offset was then adjusted to compensate for the measurement system losses. This level offset is stored within the power meter before measurements are made. This calibration verification procedure applies to the system verification and output power measurements. The calibrated reading is then taken directly from the power meter after compensation of the losses for all final power measurements. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 18 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 Manufacturer Model Description Cal Date Cal Interval Cal Due Serial Number Agilent E8257D (250kHz-20GHz) Signal Generator 3/22/2017Annual 3/22/2018MY45470194 Agilent 8594A (9kHz-2.9GHz) Spectrum Analyzer N/A N/AN/A 3051A00187 SPEAG D2450V2 2450 MHz SAR Dipole 9/13/2016Annual 9/13/2017921SPEAG EX3DV4SAR Probe 11/15/2016Annual 11/15/20177420SPEAG ES3DV3 SAR Probe 3/16/2017Annual 3/16/20183118SPEAG DAE4 Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics 9/21/2016Annual 9/21/20171449SPEAG DAE4 Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics 3/8/2017Annual 3/8/20181213Mitutoyo CD-6"CSX Digital Caliper 3/2/2016Biennial 3/2/201813264162Agilent E4438C ESG Vector Signal Generator 3/24/2017Biennial 3/24/2019MY42082385 Agilent N5182A MXG Vector Signal Generator 2/28/2017Annual 2/28/2018MY47420800 SPEAG DAKS-3.5 Portable Dielectric Assessment Kit 8/25/2016Annual 8/25/20171041Anritsu ML2495A Power Meter 10/16/2015Biennial 10/16/2017941001Anritsu ML2495A Power Meter 10/16/2015Biennial 10/16/20171039008Anritsu MA2411B Pulse Power Sensor 2/10/2017Annual 2/10/20181207364Anritsu MA2411B Pulse Power Sensor 8/18/2016Annual 8/18/20171126066Agilent 8753ES S-Parameter Vector Network Analyzer 8/19/2016Annual 8/19/2017MY40003841 Seekonk NC-100 Torque Wrench (8" lb) 9/1/2016Biennial 9/1/201821053Control Company 4352Ultra Long Stem Thermometer 5/2/2017Biennial 5/2/2019170330156Control Company 4352Ultra Long Stem Thermometer 3/3/2017Biennial 3/3/2019170155534Anritsu MA24106A USB Power Sensor 6/7/2017Annual 6/7/20181231538Anritsu MA24106A USB Power Sensor 6/7/2017Annual 6/7/20181231535Amplifier Research 15S1G6 Amplifier CBTN/ACBT433971Amplifier Research 15S1G6 Amplifier CBTN/ACBT433972COMTECH AR85729-5/5759B Solid State Amplifier CBTN/ACBTM3W1A00-1002 COMTech AR85729-5 Solid State Amplifier CBTN/ACBTM1S5A00-009 Narda 4772-3 Attenuator (3dB) CBTN/ACBT9406Narda BW-S3W2 Attenuator (3dB) CBTN/ACBT120MCL BW-N6W5+ 6dB Attenuator CBTN/ACBT1139Mini-Circuits BW-N20W5+ DC to 18 GHz Precision Fixed 20 dB Attenuator CBTN/ACBTN/A Pasternack PE2208-6 Bidirectional Coupler CBTN/ACBTN/A Pasternack PE2209-10 Bidirectional Coupler CBTN/ACBTN/A Keysight 772D Dual Directional Coupler CBTN/ACBTMY52180215 MiniCircuits SLP-2400+ Low Pass Filter CBTN/ACBTR8979500903 Mini-Circuits NLP-2950+ Low Pass Filter DC to 2700 MHz CBTN/ACBTN/A 12 M E AS U R E M E N T U N C E R T AI N T I E S FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 19 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 13 C O N C L U S I O N 13.1 Measurement Conclusion The SAR evaluation indicates that the EUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada, with respect to all parameters subject to this test. These measurements were taken to simulate the RF effects of RF exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise laboratory measures were taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The results and statements relate only to the item(s) tested. Please note that the absorption and distribution of electromagnetic energy in the body are very complex phenomena that depend on the mass, shape, and size of the body, the orientation of the body with respect to the field vectors, and the electrical properties of both the body and the environment. Other variables that may play a substantial role in possible biological effects are those that characterize the environment (e.g. ambient temperature, air velocity, relative humidity, and body insulation) and those that characterize the individual (e.g. age, gender, activity level, debilitation, or disease). Because various factors may interact with one another to vary the specific biological outcome of an exposure to electromagnetic fields, any protection guide should consider maximal amplification of biological effects as a result of field-body interactions, environmental conditions, and physiological variables. [3]
FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 20 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 14 R E F E R E N C E S
[1] Federal Communications Commission, ET Docket 93-62, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, Aug. 1996.
[2] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2005, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, 2006.
[3] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, Sept. 1992.
[4] ANSI/IEEE C95.3-2002, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave, New York: IEEE, December 2002.
[5]
IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 39 Standards Coordinating Committee 34 IEEE Std. 1528-2013, IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques.
[6] NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. Reprinted Feb. 1995.
[7] T. Schmid, O. Egger, N. Kuster, Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, Jan. 1996, pp. 105-113.
[8] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, N. Kuster, Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies, ICECOM97, Oct. 1997, pp. 1 -124.
[9] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, E-field Probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids, Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, June 23-25, 1996, pp. 172-175.
[10] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, Application Note: Data Storage and Evaluation, June 1998, p2.
[11] V. Hombach, K. Meier, M. Burkhardt, E. Kuhn, N. Kuster, The Dependence of EM Energy Absorption upon Human Modeling at 900 MHz, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44 no. 10, Oct. 1996, pp. 1865-
1873.
[12] N. Kuster and Q. Balzano, Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300MHz, IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 17-23.
[13] G. Hartsgrove, A. Kraszewski, A. Surowiec, Simulated Biological Materials for Electromagnetic Radiation Absorption Studies, University of Ottawa, Bioelectromagnetics, Canada: 1987, pp. 29-36.
[14] Q. Balzano, O. Garay, T. Manning Jr., Electromagnetic Energy Exposure of Simulated Users of Portable Cellular Telephones, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 44, no.3, Aug. 1995.
[15] W. Gander, Computermathematick, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992.
[16] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[17] N. Kuster, R. Kastle, T. Schmid, Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, May 1997, pp. 645-652. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 21 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017
[18] CENELEC CLC/SC111B, European Prestandard (prENV 50166-2), Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields High-
frequency: 10kHz-300GHz, Jan. 1995.
[19] Prof. Dr. Niels Kuster, ETH, Eidgenssische Technische Hoschschule Zrich, Dosimetric Evaluation of the Cellular Phone.
[20] IEC 62209-1, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 1: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate
(SAR) for hand-held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz), Feb. 2005.
[21] Innovation, Science, Economic Development Canada RSS-102 Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands) Issue 5, March 2015.
[22] Health Canada Safety Code 6 Limits of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz 300 GHz, 2015
[23] FCC SAR Test Procedures for 2G-3G Devices, Mobile Hotspot and UMPC Devices KDB Publications 941225, D01-D07
[24] SAR Measurement Guidance for IEEE 802.11 Transmitters, KDB Publication 248227 D01
[25] FCC SAR Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas, KDB Publications 648474 D03-D04
[26] FCC SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers, FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04
[27] FCC SAR Measurement and Reporting Requirements for 100MHz 6 GHz, KDB Publications 865664 D01-D02
[28] FCC General RF Exposure Guidance and SAR Procedures for Dongles, KDB Publication 447498, D01-D02
[29] Anexo Resoluo No. 533, de 10 de Septembro de 2009.
[30] IEC 62209-2, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate
(SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz), Mar. 2010. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
1C1706160002-58-01-R3.BCG Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 22 of 22 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 A P P E N D I X A : S A R T E S T D A T A 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A1858; Type: Watch; Serial: FH7TXOH7J880 Communication System: UID 0, IEEE 802.11b; Frequency: 2437 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Head Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2437 MHz; = 1.848 S/m; r = 39.07; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-27-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.8C; Tissue Temp: 22.8 C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3118; ConvF(4.37, 4.37, 4.37); Calibrated: 3/16/2017;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1213; Calibrated: 3/8/2017 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1868 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) Mode: IEEE 802.11b, 22 MHz Bandwidth, Head SAR, Ch6, 1 Mbps, Front Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 10.09 V/m; Power Drift = -0.07 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.309 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.163 W/kg 0 dB = 0.207 W/kg = -6.84 dBW/kg A1 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A1858; Type: Watch; Serial: FH7TXOH7J880 Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2441 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Head Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2441 MHz; = 1.829 S/m; r = 40.456; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.7C; Tissue Temp: 24.2C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7420; ConvF(7.38, 7.38, 7.38); Calibrated: 11/15/2016;
Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1449; Calibrated: 9/21/2016 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1793 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) Mode: Bluetooth ePA, Head SAR, Ch 39, 1 Mbps, Front Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 8.603 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.232 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.118 W/kg 0 dB = 0.184 W/kg = -7.35 dBW/kg A2 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A1858; Type: Watch; Serial: FH7TXOH7J880 Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2441 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Head Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2441 MHz; = 1.829 S/m; r = 40.456; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.7C; Tissue Temp: 24.2C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7420; ConvF(7.38, 7.38, 7.38); Calibrated: 11/15/2016;
Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1449; Calibrated: 9/21/2016 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1793 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) Mode: Bluetooth iPA, Head SAR, Ch 39, 1 Mbps, Front Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.410 V/m; Power Drift = 0.10 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0650 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.033 W/kg A3 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A1858; Type: Watch; Serial: FH7TX0J8J880 Communication System: UID 0, IEEE 802.11b; Frequency: 2437 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2437 MHz; = 2.014 S/m; r = 52.54; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 0.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.8C; Tissue Temp: 22.6C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3118; ConvF(4.29, 4.29, 4.29); Calibrated: 3/16/2017;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1213; Calibrated: 3/8/2017 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1868 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) Mode: IEEE 802.11b, 22 MHz Bandwidth, Extremity SAR, Ch 6, 1 Mbps, Back Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 5.883 V/m; Power Drift = 0.06 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.112 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 0.033 W/kg 0 dB = 0.0795 W/kg = -11.00 dBW/kg A4 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A1858; Type: Watch; Serial: FH7TXOH7J880 Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2441 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2441 MHz; = 2.019 S/m; r = 52.524; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section ; Space: 0.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.8C; Tissue Temp: 22.6C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3118; ConvF(4.29, 4.29, 4.29); Calibrated: 3/16/2017;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1213; Calibrated: 3/8/2017 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1868 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) Mode: Bluetooth ePA, Extremity SAR, Ch 39, 1 Mbps, Back Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x8x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 5.508 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.110 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 0.027 W/kg A5 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A1858; Type: Watch; Serial: FH7TX0J8J880 Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2441 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2441 MHz; = 2.019 S/m; r = 52.524; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 0.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.8C; Tissue Temp: 22.6C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3118; ConvF(4.29, 4.29, 4.29); Calibrated: 3/16/2017;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1213; Calibrated: 3/8/2017 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1868 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) Mode: Bluetooth iPA, Extremity SAR, Ch 39, 1 Mbps, Back Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x8x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 2.749 V/m; Power Drift = -0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0310 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 0.00574 W/kg A6 A P P E N D I X B : S Y S T E M V E R I F I C A T I O N 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Head Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 1.84 S/m; r = 40.421; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.7C; Tissue Temp: 24.2C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7420; ConvF(7.38, 7.38, 7.38); Calibrated: 11/15/2016;
Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1449; Calibrated: 09/21/2016 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1793 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 11.5 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 5.15 W/kg Deviation (1 g) = -1.15%
B1 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Head Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 1.872 S/m; r = 39; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-27-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.8C; Tissue Temp: 22.8C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3118; ConvF(4.37, 4.37, 4.37); Calibrated: 03/16/2017;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1213; Calibrated: 03/08/2017 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1868 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 10.7 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 4.94 W/kg Deviation(1 g) = -5.18%
0 dB = 6.59 W/kg = 8.19 dBW/kg B2 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 Body Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 2.032 S/m; r = 52.489; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-17-2017; Ambient Temp: 22.8C; Tissue Temp: 22.6C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3118; ConvF(4.29, 4.29, 4.29); Calibrated: 03/16/2017;
Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1213; Calibrated: 03/08/2017 Phantom: SAM with CRP v5.0; Type: QD000P40CD; Serial: TP:1868 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7417) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 11.4 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 2.49 W/kg Deviation(10 g) = 3.75%
0 dB = 7.06 W/kg = 8.49 dBW/kg B3 A P P E N D I X C : P R O B E C A L I B R A T I O N 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. A P P E N D I X D : S AR T I S S U E S P E C I F I C AT I O N S Measurement Procedure for Tissue verification:
1) The network analyzer and probe system was configured and calibrated. 2) The probe was immersed in the tissue. The tissue was placed in a nonmetallic container. Trapped air bubbles beneath the flange were minimized by placing the probe at a slight angle. 3) The complex admittance with respect to the probe aperture was measured 4) The complex relative permittivity can be calculated from the below equation (Pournaropoulos and Misra):
where Y is the admittance of the probe in contact with the sample, the primed and unprimed coordinates refer to source and observation points, respectively,
.
, is the angular frequency, and Table D-I Composition of the Tissue Equivalent Matter FCC ID: BCG-A1858 Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. SAR EVALUATION REPORT Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX D:
Page 1 of 2 REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 babarrdddrrjabjY02/10'020)(expcosln2cos2222r1jFrequency (MHz)24502450TissueHeadBodyIngredients (% by weight)DGBE26.7NaCl0.1Water73.2See page 2 Composition of 2.4 GHz Head Tissue Equivalent Matter Figure D-1 Note: 2.4 GHz head liquid recipes are proprietary SPEAG. Since the composition is approximate to the actual liquids utilized, the manufacturer tissue-equivalent liquid data sheets are provided below. Figure D-2 2.4 GHz Head Tissue Equivalent Matter FCC ID: BCG-A1858 Test Dates:
07/17/17 07/27/17 DUT Type:
Watch 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. SAR EVALUATION REPORT Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX D:
Page 2 of 2 REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 A P P E N D I X E : S AR S Y S T E M V A L I D A T I O N Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D02v01r02, SAR system validation status should be documented to confirm measurement accuracy. The SAR systems (including SAR probes, system components and software versions) used for this device were validated against its performance specifications prior to the SAR measurements. Reference dipoles were used with the required tissue- equivalent media for system validation, according to the procedures outlined in FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04. Since SAR probe calibrations are frequency dependent, each probe calibration point was validated at a frequency within the valid frequency range of the probe calibration point, using the system that normally operates with the probe for routine SAR measurements and according to the required tissue-equivalent media. A tabulated summary of the system validation status including the validation date(s), measurement frequencies, SAR probes and tissue dielectric parameters has been included. Table E-I SAR System Validation Summary (1g) SAR System Validation Summary (10g) Table E-II NOTE: While the probes have been calibrated for both CW and modulated signals, all measurements were performed using communication systems calibrated for CW signals only. Modulations in the table above represent test configurations for which the measurement system has been validated per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 for scenarios when CW probe calibrations are used with other signal types. SAR systems were validated for modulated signals with a periodic duty cycle, such as GMSK, or with a high peak to average ratio (>5 dB), such as OFDM according to FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04. FCC ID: BCG-A1858 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Test Dates:
DUT Type:
07/17/17 07/27/17 Watch 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX E:
Page 1 of 1 REV 18.3 M 01/30/2017 COND.PERM.()(r)SENSITIVITYPROBE LINEARITYPROBE ISOTROPYMOD. TYPEDUTY FACTORPARCAL 124504/29/20177420EX3DV42450Head1.79839.390PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSCAL 324504/13/20173118ES3DV32450Head1.84939.452PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSCW VALIDATIONMOD. VALIDATIONSAR SYSTEM #FREQ. [MHz]DATEPROBE SNPROBE TYPEPROBE CAL. POINTCOND.PERM.()(r)SENSITIVITYPROBE LINEARITYPROBE ISOTROPYMOD. TYPEDUTY FACTORPARCAL 324504/19/20173118ES3DV32450Body1.97050.772PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSCW VALIDATIONMOD. VALIDATIONSAR SYSTEM #FREQ. [MHz]DATEPROBE SNPROBE TYPEPROBE CAL. POINT
This product uses the FCC Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the FCC