| submitted | available | document details (if available) | source link |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 09 2019 | October 09 2019 |
| various | RF Exposure Info | RF Exposure Info | 4.81 MiB | January 09 2019 / October 09 2019 |
PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. 18855 Adams Ct, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 USA Tel. +1.410.290.6652 / Fax +1.410.290.6654 http://www.pctest.com SAR EVALUATION REPORT Applicant Name:
Apple, Inc. One Apple Park Way Cupertino, CA 95014 F C C I D :
Date of Testing:
06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Test Site/Location:
PCTEST Lab, Morgan Hill, CA, USA Document Serial No.:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG BCG-A2093 A P P L I C A N T :
APPLE, INC. DUT Type:
Application Type:
FCC Rule Part(s):
Model:
Watch Certification CFR 2.1093 A2093 Note: This revised Test Report (S/N: 1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG) supersedes and replaces the previously issued test report on the same subject device for the same type of testing as indicated. Please discard or destroy the previously issued test report(s) and dispose of it accordingly. This watch has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in Section 1.7 of this report; for North American frequency bands only. I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. Test results reported herein relate only to the item(s) tested. The SAR Tick is an initiative of the Mobile & Wireless Forum (MWF). While a product may be considered eligible, use of the SAR Tick logo requires an agreement with the MWF. Further details can be obtained by emailing: sartick@mwfai.info. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 1 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 1g Head (W/kg)10g Extremity (W/kg)DTS2.4 GHz WLAN2412 - 2472 MHz0.16<0.1DSS/DTSBluetooth2402 - 2480 MHz0.11<0.1Band & ModeTx FrequencyEquipment ClassSAR T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S DEVICE UNDER TEST .................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................5 DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................6 TEST CONFIGURATION POSITIONS FOR WRIST-WORN DEVICES .......................................................7 RF EXPOSURE LIMITS ................................................................................................................................8 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................9 RF CONDUCTED POWERS ...................................................................................................................... 10 SYSTEM VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 12 SAR DATA SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 14 SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY ........................................................................................................ 16 EQUIPMENT LIST ...................................................................................................................................... 17 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES.......................................................................................................... 18 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 19 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 APPENDIX A:
SAR TEST PLOTS APPENDIX B:
SAR DIPOLE VERIFICATION PLOTS APPENDIX C:
PROBE AND DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES APPENDIX D:
SAR TISSUE SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX E:
SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION APPENDIX F:
DUT ANTENNA DIAGRAM & SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 2 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 1 D E V I C E U N D E R T E S T 1.1 Device Overview Table 1-1 This device does not support network based voice services. Head SAR was evaluated to address VoIP operations per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D010v06. 1.2 Power Reduction for SAR There is no power reduction used for any band/mode implemented in this device for SAR purposes. 1.3 Nominal and Maximum Output Power Specifications This device operates using the following maximum and nominal output power specifications. SAR values were scaled to the maximum allowed power to determine compliance per KDB Publication 447498 D01v06. 1.3.1 Nominal and Maximum Output Power Summary Max Conducted Powers WIFI mode Table 1-2 Summary Nominal and Max Conducted Powers Bluetooth mode Table 1-3 FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 3 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 2.4 GHz WLANData2412 - 2472 MHzBluetoothData2402 - 2480 MHzNFCData13.56 MHzBand & ModeOperating ModesTx FrequencyChannel123 - 10111213Maximum18.0Maximum17.518.519.017.014.56.5Maximum17.518.519.017.014.56.520.0Mode / BandIEEE 802.11n (2.4 GHz)IEEE 802.11b (2.4 GHz)IEEE 802.11g (2.4 GHz)Modulated Average (dBm)MaximumNominalMaximumNominalMaximumNominalMaximumNominalMaximumNominal17.018.017.0Bluetooth LEMode/BandModulated Average (dBm)Bluetooth BDR18.0Bluetooth EDR11.5Bluetooth HDR4Bluetooth HDR812.011.012.513.012.0 1.4 DUT Antenna Locations A diagram showing the location of the device antennas can be found in Appendix F. 1.5 Near Field Communications (NFC) Antenna This DUT has NFC operations. The NFC antenna is integrated into the device for this model. Therefore, all SAR tests were performed with the device which already incorporates the NFC antenna. A diagram showing the location of the NFC antenna can be found in Appendix F. 1.6 Simultaneous Transmission Capabilities This Device does not support any simultaneous transmission scenarios. 1.7 Guidance Applied FCC KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 (SAR Considerations for 802.11 Devices) FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 (General SAR Guidance) FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, D02v01r02 (SAR Measurements up to 6 GHz) 1.8 Device Serial Numbers Several samples with identical hardware were used to support SAR testing. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units. The serial numbers used for each test are indicated alongside the results in Section 9. 1.9 Housing Type and Wrist Band Types Only one housing type, aluminum, is available for this model. The device can also be used with different wrist band accessories. All metallic wrist bands were tested, and the sport band non-metallic wrist band was tested fully for all required exposure conditions. Other non-metallic wrist-bands were checked to be similar or lower in SAR. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 4 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 2 I N T R O D U C T I O N The FCC and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada have adopted the guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radio frequency (RF) radiation in ET Docket 93-62 on Aug. 6, 1996 and Health Canada Safety Code 6 to protect the public and workers from the potential hazards of RF emissions due to FCC-regulated portable devices. [1]
The safety limits used for the environmental evaluation measurements are based on the criteria published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) in IEEE/ANSI C95.1-
1992 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz [3] and Health Canada RF Exposure Guidelines Safety Code 6 [22]. The measurement procedure described in IEEE/ANSI C95.3-2002 Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave [4] is used for guidance in measuring the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) due to the RF radiation exposure from the Equipment Under Test (EUT). These criteria for SAR evaluation are similar to those recommended by the International Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, Report No. Vol 74. SAR is a measure of the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting source. SAR values have been related to threshold levels for potential biological hazards. 2.1 SAR Definition Specific Absorption Rate is defined as the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dU) absorbed by
(dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dV) of a given density (). It is also defined as the rate of RF energy absorption per unit mass at a point in an absorbing body (see Equation 2-1). Equation 2-1 SAR Mathematical Equation SAR is expressed in units of Watts per Kilogram (W/kg). where:
= conductivity of the tissue-simulating material (S/m) E = Total RMS electric field strength (V/m)
= mass density of the tissue-simulating material (kg/m3) NOTE: The primary factors that control rate of energy absorption were found to be the wavelength of the incident field in relation to the dimensions and geometry of the irradiated organism, the orientation of the organism in relation to the polarity of field vectors, the presence of reflecting surfaces, and whether conductive contact is made by the organism with a ground plane.[6]
FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 5 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 SARddtdUdmddtdUdv==2ESAR= 3 D O S I M E T R I C A S S E S S M E N T 3.1 Measurement Procedure The evaluation was performed using the following procedure compliant to FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013:
1. The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head or body was measured at a distance no greater than 5.0 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the device-head and body interface and the horizontal grid resolution was determined per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 (See Table 3-1) and IEEE 1528-2013. 2. The point SAR measurement was taken at the maximum SAR region determined from Step 1 to enable the monitoring of SAR fluctuations/drifts during the 1g/10g cube evaluation. SAR at this fixed point was measured and used as a reference value. 3. Based on the area scan data, the peak of the region with maximum SAR Figure 3-1 Sample SAR Area Scan was determined by spline interpolation. Around this point, a volume was assessed according to the measurement resolution and volume size requirements of FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 (See Table 3-1) and IEEE 1528-2013. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated with the following procedure (see references or the DASY manual online for more details):
a. SAR values at the inner surface of the phantom are extrapolated from the measured values along the line away from the surface with spacing no greater than that in Table 3-1. The extrapolation was based on a least-squares algorithm. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in the z-axis
(normal to the phantom shell). b. After the maximum interpolated values were calculated between the points in the cube, the SAR was averaged over the spatial volume (1g or 10g) using a 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-spline is composed of three one-dimensional splines with the Not a knot condition (in x, y, and z directions). The volume was then integrated with the trapezoidal algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were obtained through interpolation, in order to calculate the averaged SAR. c. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. 4. The SAR reference value, at the same location as step 2, was re-measured after the zoom scan was complete to calculate the SAR drift. If the drift deviated by more than 5%, the SAR test and drift measurements were repeated. Area and Zoom Scan Resolutions per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04*
Table 3-1
*Also compliant to IEEE 1528-2013 Table 6 FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 6 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 Uniform Gridzzoom(n)zzoom(1)*zzoom(n>1)* 2 GHz 15 8 5 4 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 302-3 GHz 12 5 5 4 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 303-4 GHz 12 5 4 3 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 284-5 GHz 10 4 3 2.5 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 255-6 GHz 10 4 2 2 1.5*zzoom(n-1) 22Minimum Zoom Scan Volume (mm)(x,y,z)Maximum Zoom Scan Spatial Resolution (mm)Graded GridFrequencyMaximum Area Scan Resolution (mm)(xarea, yarea)Maximum Zoom Scan Resolution (mm)(xzoom, yzoom) 4 T E S T C O N F I G U R A T I O N P O S I T I O N S F O R W R I S T - W O R N D E V I C E S 4.1 Device Holder The device holder is made out of low-loss POM material having the following dielectric parameters: relative permittivity = 3 and loss tangent = 0.02. Additionally, a manufacturer provided low-loss foam was used to position the device for head SAR evaluations. 4.2 Positioning for Head Devices that are designed to be worn on the wrist may operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. When next-to-mouth SAR evaluation is required, the device is positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The device is evaluated with wrist bands strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 4.3 Extremity Exposure Configurations Devices that are designed or intended for use on extremities or mainly operated in extremity only exposure conditions; i.e., hands, wrists, feet and ankles, may require extremity SAR evaluation. When the device also operates in close proximity to the users body, SAR compliance for the body is also required. When extremity SAR evaluation is required, the device is evaluated with the back of the device touching the flat phantom, which is filled with body tissue-equivalent medium. The device was evaluated with Sport wrist band unstrapped and touching the phantom. For Metal Loop and Metal Links wrist bands, the device was evaluated with wrist bands strapped and the distance between wrist bands and the phantom was minimized to represent the spacing created by actual use conditions. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 7 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 5 R F E X P O S U R E L I M I T S 5.1 Uncontrolled Environment UNCONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity. 5.2 Controlled Environment CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by persons who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. SAR Human Exposure Specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and Health Canada Safety Code 6 Table 5-1 1. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and over the appropriate averaging time. 2. The Spatial Average value of the SAR averaged over the whole body. 3. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and over the appropriate averaging time. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 8 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 6 F C C M E A S U R E M E N T P R O C E D U R E S 6.1 Measured and Reported SAR Per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06, when SAR is not measured at the maximum power level allowed for production units, the results must be scaled to the maximum tune-up tolerance limit according to the power applied to the individual channels tested to determine compliance. When SAR is measured at or scaled to the maximum tune-up tolerance limit, the results are referred to as reported SAR. The highest reported SAR results are identified on the grant of equipment authorization according to procedures in KDB 690783 D01v01r03. 6.2 SAR Testing with 802.11 Transmitters The normal network operating configurations of 802.11 transmitters are not suitable for SAR measurements. Unpredictable fluctuations in network traffic and antenna diversity conditions can introduce undesirable variations in SAR results. The SAR for these devices should be measured using chipset based test mode software to ensure the results are consistent and reliable. See KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for more details. 6.2.1 General Device Setup Chipset based test mode software is hardware dependent and generally varies among manufacturers. The device operating parameters established in test mode for SAR measurements must be identical to those programmed in production units, including output power levels, amplifier gain settings and other RF performance tuning parameters. A periodic duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. The reported SAR is scaled to 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. 6.2.2 2.4 GHz SAR Test Requirements SAR is measured for 2.4 GHz 802.11b DSSS using either the fixed test position or, when applicable, the initial test position procedure. SAR test reduction is determined according to the following:
1) When the reported SAR of the highest measured maximum output power channel for the exposure configuration is 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required for 802.11b DSSS in that exposure configuration. When the reported SAR is > 0.8 W/kg, SAR is required for that position using the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel; i.e., all channels require testing. 2) 2.4 GHz 802.11 g/n OFDM are additionally evaluated for SAR if the highest reported SAR for 802.11b, adjusted by the ratio of the OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power, is > 1.2 W/kg. When SAR is required for OFDM modes in 2.4 GHz band, the Initial Test Configuration Procedures should be followed. When 10g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 9 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 R F C O N D U C T E D P O W E R S 7 7.1 WLAN Conducted Powers Table 7-1 2.4 GHz WLAN Maximum Average RF Power Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02:
Power measurements were performed for the transmission mode configuration with the highest maximum output power specified for production units. For transmission modes with the same maximum output power specification, powers were measured for the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation and lowest data rate. For transmission modes with identical maximum specified output power, channel bandwidth, modulation and data rates, power measurements were required for all identical configurations. For each transmission mode configuration, powers were measured for the highest and lowest channels;
and at the mid-band channel(s) when there were at least 3 channels supported. For configurations with multiple mid-band channels, due to an even number of channels, both channels were measured. The bolded data rate and channel above were tested for SAR. Figure 7-1 Power Measurement Setup FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 10 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 AverageAverageAverage2412119.9517.4817.5024172N/A18.5018.4824223N/A18.9918.992437619.9819.0018.99245710N/A18.9719.0024621119.9616.9816.91Freq [MHz]Channel2.4GHz Conducted Power [dBm]IEEE Transmission Mode802.11b802.11g802.11nWireless DevicePower SensorPower Meter 7.2 Bluetooth Conducted Powers Table 7-2 Bluetooth Average RF Power Notes:
1. The bolded data rates and channel above were tested for SAR. 2. Bluetooth was evaluated with a test mode with 100% transmission duty factor. Figure 7-2 Power Measurement Setup FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 11 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019
[dBm][mW]2402GFSK1.0016.1140.8322441GFSK1.03916.2141.7832480GFSK1.07816.0139.902Frequency [MHz]ModulationData Rate [Mbps]Channel No.Avg Conducted PowerWireless DevicePower SensorPower Meter S Y S T E M V E R I F I C A T I O N 8 8.1 Tissue Verification Table 8-1 Measured Tissue Properties The above measured tissue parameters were used in the DASY software. The DASY software was used to perform interpolation to determine the dielectric parameters at the SAR test device frequencies (per KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013 6.6.1.2). The tissue parameters listed in the SAR test plots may slightly differ from the table above due to significant digit rounding in the software. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 12 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 Calibrated for Tests Performed on:Tissue TypeTissue Temp During Calibration (C)Measured Frequency (MHz)Measured Conductivity, (S/m)Measured Dielectric Constant, TARGET Conductivity, (S/m)TARGET Dielectric Constant, % dev % dev 24001.77838.7091.75639.2891.25%-1.48%24501.81638.6401.80039.2000.89%-1.43%25001.85438.5501.85539.136-0.05%-1.50%24001.77037.9421.75639.2890.80%-3.43%24501.80837.8811.80039.2000.44%-3.36%25001.84737.7991.85539.136-0.43%-3.42%24001.98252.7811.90252.7674.21%0.03%24502.03252.6981.95052.7004.21%0.00%25002.07652.6412.02152.6362.72%0.01%24001.96251.0891.90252.7673.15%-3.18%24502.00451.0321.95052.7002.77%-3.17%25002.05050.9582.02152.6361.43%-3.19%6/27/20192400H20.921.42400H7/18/20196/27/20192400B21.223.02400B7/18/2019 8.2 Test System Verification Prior to SAR assessment, the system is verified to 10% of the SAR measurement on the reference dipole at the time of calibration by the calibration facility. Full system validation status and result summary can be found in Appendix E. Table 8-2 System Verification Results 1g Table 8-3 System Verification Results 10g Figure 8-1 Figure 8-2 System Verification Setup Diagram System Verification Setup Photo FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 13 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 AM52450HEAD06/27/201919.920.50.10092133185.57053.10055.7004.90%AM22450HEAD07/18/201922.121.40.10075074905.33053.10053.3000.38%1 W Normalized SAR1g (W/kg)Source SNTissue TypeProbe SNDateAmb. Temp (C)Liquid Temp (C)Input Power (W)Measured SAR1g (W/kg)Deviation1g (%)1 W Target SAR1g (W/kg)System VerificationTARGET & MEASURED SAR System #Tissue Frequency (MHz)AM42450BODY06/27/201923.121.20.10092175322.50023.80025.0005.04%AM52450BODY07/18/201922.921.80.10075033182.44024.10024.4001.24%Input Power (W)Source SNProbe SNMeasured SAR10g (W/kg)1 W Target SAR10g (W/kg)1 W Normalized SAR10g (W/kg)Deviation10g (%)System VerificationTARGET & MEASURED SAR System #Tissue Frequency (MHz)Tissue TypeDateAmb. Temp (C)Liquid Temp (C) 9 S A R D A T A S U M M A R Y 9.1 Standalone Head SAR Data Table 9-1 2.4 GHz WLAN Head SAR Data Table 9-2 Bluetooth Head SAR Data 9.2 Standalone Extremity SAR Data Table 9-3 2.4 GHz WLAN Extremity SAR Data FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 14 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 MEASUREMENT RESULTS SAR (1g)Reported SAR (1g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)24121802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.95 0.2010 mmAluminumSportD92YT01BMW621front100.00.1361.0121.0000.13824376802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.98 -0.1510 mmAluminumSportD92YT01BMW621front100.00.1581.0051.0000.159A1246211802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.96 -0.0310 mmAluminumSportD92YT01BMW621front100.00.1531.0091.0000.15424376802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.98 0.0910 mmAluminumMetal LinksD92YT01BMW621front100.00.1391.0051.0000.14024376802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.98 0.0010 mmAluminumMetal LoopD92YT01BMW621front100.00.1281.0051.0000.129ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITHeadSpatial Peak 1.6 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 1 gramsDuty Cycle (%)Scaling Factor (Power)Plot #Wrist Band TypeData Rate (Mbps)Scaling Factor (Duty Cycle)Device Serial NumberSideHousing TypeBandwidth [MHz]Power Drift [dB]Maximum Allowed Power [dBm]SpacingFREQUENCYModeConducted Power [dBm]ServiceMEASUREMENT RESULTS SAR (1g)Reported SAR (1g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)2402.000BluetoothFHSS18.016.11 -0.0110 mmAluminumSportD92YT01DMW621front1000.0681.5451.000.105A22441.0039BluetoothFHSS18.016.21 -0.0110 mmAluminumSportD92YT01DMW621front1000.0611.5101.000.0922480.0078BluetoothFHSS18.016.01 0.0110 mmAluminumSportD92YT01DMW621front1000.0641.5811.000.1012441.0039BluetoothFHSS18.016.21 0.1210 mmAluminumMetal LinksD92YT01DMW621front1000.0451.5101.000.0682441.0039BluetoothFHSS18.016.21 0.0810 mmAluminumMetal LoopD92YT01DMW621front1000.0471.5101.000.071ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITHeadSpatial Peak 1.6 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 1 gramsPlot #SpacingHousing TypeWrist Band TypeDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)SidePower Drift [dB]Scaling Factor (Duty Cycle)FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm]Conducted Power [dBm]Duty Cycle (%)Scaling Factor (Cond Power)MEASUREMENT RESULTS SAR (10g)Reported SAR (10g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)24376802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.98 0.200 mmAluminumSportD92YT01DMW621back100.01.0051.0000.0750.07524121802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.95 0.010 mmAluminumMetal LinksD92YT01DMW621back100.01.0121.0000.0830.08424376802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.98 0.160 mmAluminumMetal LinksD92YT01DMW621back100.01.0051.0000.0840.084A3246211802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.96 -0.080 mmAluminumMetal LinksD92YT01DMW621back100.01.0091.0000.0800.08124376802.11bDSSS22 20.0 19.98 0.000 mmAluminumMetal LoopD92YT01DMW621back100.01.0051.0000.0560.056ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITExtremitySpatial Peak 4.0 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 10 gramsDuty Cycle (%)Scaling Factor (Power)Plot #Scaling Factor (Duty Cycle)Bandwidth [MHz]Data Rate (Mbps)Power Drift [dB]Device Serial NumberSideSpacingFREQUENCYConducted Power [dBm]ModeWrist Band TypeHousing TypeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm] Table 9-4 Bluetooth Extremity SAR Data 9.3 SAR Test Notes General Notes:
1. The test data reported are the worst-case SAR values according to test procedures specified in FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06. 2. Batteries are fully charged at the beginning of the SAR measurements. 3. Liquid tissue depth was at least 15.0 cm for all frequencies. 4. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units. 5. SAR results were scaled to the maximum allowed power to demonstrate compliance per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06. 6. Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, variability SAR tests were not required since measured SAR results for all frequency bands were less than 0.8 W/kg for 1g SAR and 2.0 W/kg for 10g SAR. 7. Only one housing type, aluminum, is available for this model. The non-metallic wrist band, sport band, was evaluated for all exposure conditions. The available metallic wrist accessories, metal links band and metal loop band, were additionally evaluated. 8. This device is a portable wrist-worn device and does not support any other use conditions. Therefore the procedures in FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 Section 6.2 have been applied for extremity and next to mouth (head) conditions. WLAN Notes:
1. Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for 2.4 GHz WIFI single transmission chain operations, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. SAR for OFDM modes (2.4 GHz 802.11g/n) was not required due to the maximum allowed powers and the highest reported DSSS SAR. See Section 6.2.2 for more information. 2. When the maximum reported 1g averaged SAR is 0.8 W/kg, SAR testing on additional channels was not required. Otherwise, SAR for the next highest output power channel was required until the reported SAR result was 1.20 W/kg for 1g evaluations or all test channels were measured. 3. When 10-g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above. 4. The device was configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools. The reported SAR was scaled to the 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance. The maximum achievable duty cycles for all modes were determined based on measurements performed on a spectrum analyzer in zero-span mode with RBW = 8 MHz, VBW = 50 MHz, and detector peak per guidance of Section 6.0 b) of ANSI C63. 10-2013 and KDB 558074 D01 v04. The RBW and VBW were both greater than 50/T, where T is the minimum transmission duration, and the number of sweep points across T was greater than 100. Bluetooth Notes 1. To determine compliance, Bluetooth SAR was measured with maximum power condition. Bluetooth was evaluated with a test mode with 100% transmission duty factor. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 15 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 MEASUREMENT RESULTS SAR (10g)Reported SAR (10g)MHzCh.(W/kg)(W/kg)24020BluetoothFHSS18.0 16.11 0.050 mmAluminumSportD92YT01DMW621back1001.5451.000.0240.037244139BluetoothFHSS18.0 16.21 -0.010 mmAluminumSportD92YT01BMW621back1001.5101.000.0240.036248078BluetoothFHSS18.0 16.01 -0.070 mmAluminumSportD92YT01DMW621back1001.5811.000.0280.044A4244139BluetoothFHSS18.0 16.21 0.160 mmAluminumMetal LinksD92YT01BMW621back1001.5101.000.0210.032244139BluetoothFHSS18.0 16.21 0.050 mmAluminumMetal LoopD92YT01BMW621back1001.5101.000.0170.026ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMITExtemitySpatial Peak 4.0 W/kg (mW/g)Uncontrolled Exposure/General Populationaveraged over 10 gramsSideDuty Cycle (%)Scaling Factor (Cond Power)Scaling Factor (Duty Cycle)Plot #SpacingHousing TypeWrist Band TypeDevice Serial NumberData Rate (Mbps)Conducted Power [dBm]Power Drift [dB]FREQUENCYModeServiceMaximum Allowed Power [dBm] 10 S A R M E A S U R E M E N T V A R I A B I L I T Y 10.1 Measurement Variability Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01, SAR measurement variability was not assessed for each frequency band since all measured SAR values are < 0.80 W/kg for 1g SAR and < 2.0 W/kg for 10g SAR. 10.2 Measurement Uncertainty The measured SAR was <1.5 W/kg for 1g and <3.75 W/kg for 10g for all frequency bands. Therefore, per KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, the extended measurement uncertainty analysis per IEEE 1528-2013 was not required. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 16 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 11 E Q U I P M E N T L I S T Note: CBT (Calibrated Before Testing). Prior to testing, the measurement paths containing a cable, amplifier, attenuator, coupler or filter were connected to a calibrated source (i.e. a signal generator) to determine the losses of the measurement path. The power meter offset was then adjusted to compensate for the measurement system losses. This level offset is stored within the power meter before measurements are made. This calibration verification procedure applies to the system verification and output power measurements. The calibrated reading is then taken directly from the power meter after compensation of the losses for all final power measurements. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 17 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 Manufacturer Model Description Cal Date Cal Interval Cal Due Serial Number Agilent 8753ES S-Parameter Network Analyzer 10/2/2018Annual 10/2/2019US39170118 Agilent 8753ES Network Analyzer 3/19/2019Annual 3/19/2020MY40001472 Agilent E4440A PSA Series Spectrum Analyzer 11/14/2018Annual 11/14/2019MY46186272 Agilent N5182A MXG Vector Signal Generator 6/27/2019Annual 6/27/2020US46240505 Amplifier Research 150A100C Amplifier CBTN/ACBT350132Amplifier Research 15S1G6 Amplifier CBTN/ACBT343972Amplifier Research 15S1G6 Amplifier CBTN/ACBT343971Anritsu MA24106A USB Power Sensor 5/6/2019Annual 5/6/20201231538Anritsu MA24106A USB Power Sensor 1/31/2019Annual 1/31/20201520503Anritsu MA24106A USB Power Sensor 1/31/2019Annual 1/31/20201520501Anritsu MA2411B Pulse Power Sensor 10/30/2018Annual 10/30/20191207470Anritsu MA2411B Pulse Power Sensor 11/20/2018Annual 11/20/20191339007Anritsu ML2495A Power Meter 10/21/2018Annual 10/21/2019941001Anritsu ML2495A Power Meter 11/20/2018Annual 11/20/20191039008Anritsu ML2496A Power Meter 10/21/2018Annual 10/21/20191138001Control Company 4040Temperature / Humidity Monitor 2/28/2018Biennial 2/28/2020150761911Control Company 4352Ultra Long Stem Thermometer 2/28/2018Biennial 2/28/2020170330160Control Company 4352Ultra Long Stem Thermometer 2/28/2018Biennial 2/28/2020170330158MCL BW-N6W5+ 6dB Attenuator CBTN/ACBT1139MiniCircuits SLP-2400+ Low Pass Filter CBTN/ACBTR8979500903 Mini-Circuits NLP-2950+ Low Pass Filter DC to 2700 MHz CBTN/ACBTN/A Mitutoyo CD-6"CSX Digital Caliper 4/18/2018Biennial 4/18/202013264165Narda 4772-3 Attenuator (3dB) CBTN/ACBT9406Pasternack PE2208-6 Bidirectional Coupler CBTN/ACBTN/A Pasternack PE2209-10 Bidirectional Coupler CBTN/ACBTN/A Pasternack PE5011-1 Torque Wrench 7/19/2017Biennial 7/19/2019N/A Pasternack PE5011-1 Torque Wrench 7/19/2017Biennial 7/19/2019N/A SPEAG D2450V2 2450 MHz SAR Dipole 11/12/2018Annual 11/12/2019921SPEAG D2450V2 2450 MHz SAR Dipole 6/14/2019Biennial 6/14/2020750SPEAG DAE4 Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics 8/14/2018Annual 8/14/20191408SPEAG DAE4 Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics 11/12/2018Annual 11/12/20191449SPEAG DAE4 Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics 4/17/2019Annual 4/17/2020501SPEAG DAE4 Data Acquisition Electronics 1/15/2019Annual 1/15/20201532SPEAG DAK-3.5 Dielectric Assessment Kit 5/7/2019Annual 5/7/20201070SPEAG ES3DV3 SAR Probe 11/19/2018Annual 11/19/20193318SPEAG EX3DV4 SAR Probe 1/24/2019Annual 1/24/20207490SPEAG EX3DV4 SAR Probe 4/12/2019Annual 4/12/20207532 12 M E A S U R E M E N T U N C E R T A I N T I E S FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 18 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 acde= fgh = i =kf(d,k) c x f/ec x g/eTol.Prob.cici1gm10gms( %)Dist.Div.1gm10 gmsui ui vi ( %)( %)Probe Calibration6.55N11.01.06.66.6Axial Isotropy0.25N10.70.70.20.2Hemishperical Isotropy1.3N10.70.70.90.9Boundary Effect2.0R1.731.01.01.21.2Linearity0.3N11.01.00.30.3System Detection Limits0.25R1.731.01.00.10.1Readout Electronics0.3N11.01.00.30.3Response Time0.8R1.731.01.00.50.5Integration Time2.6R1.731.01.01.51.5RF Ambient Conditions - Noise3.0R1.731.01.01.71.7RF Ambient Conditions - Reflections3.0R1.731.01.01.71.7Probe Positioner Mechanical Tolerance0.4R1.731.01.00.20.2Probe Positioning w/ respect to Phantom6.7R1.731.01.03.93.9Extrapolation, Interpolation & Integration algorithms for Max. SAR Evaluation4.0R1.731.01.02.32.3Test Sample RelatedTest Sample Positioning2.7N11.01.02.72.735Device Holder Uncertainty1.67N11.01.01.71.75Output Power Variation - SAR drift measurement5.0R1.731.01.02.92.9SAR Scaling0.0R1.731.01.00.00.0Phantom & Tissue ParametersPhantom Uncertainty (Shape & Thickness tolerances)7.6R1.731.01.04.44.4Liquid Conductivity - measurement uncertainty4.2N10.780.713.33.010Liquid Permittivity - measurement uncertainty4.1N10.230.261.01.110Liquid Conductivity - Temperature Uncertainty3.4R1.730.780.711.51.4Liquid Permittivity - Temperature Unceritainty0.6R1.730.230.260.10.1Liquid Conductivity - deviation from target values5.0R1.730.640.431.81.2Liquid Permittivity - deviation from target values5.0R1.730.600.491.71.4Combined Standard Uncertainty (k=1)RSS11.511.360Expanded Uncertaintyk=223.022.6(95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL)Uncertainty ComponentMeasurement System 13 C O N C L U S I O N 13.1 Measurement Conclusion The SAR evaluation indicates that the EUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada, with respect to all parameters subject to this test. These measurements were taken to simulate the RF effects of RF exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise laboratory measures were taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The results and statements relate only to the item(s) tested. Please note that the absorption and distribution of electromagnetic energy in the body are very complex phenomena that depend on the mass, shape, and size of the body, the orientation of the body with respect to the field vectors, and the electrical properties of both the body and the environment. Other variables that may play a substantial role in possible biological effects are those that characterize the environment (e.g. ambient temperature, air velocity, relative humidity, and body insulation) and those that characterize the individual (e.g. age, gender, activity level, debilitation, or disease). Because various factors may interact with one another to vary the specific biological outcome of an exposure to electromagnetic fields, any protection guide should consider maximal amplification of biological effects as a result of field-body interactions, environmental conditions, and physiological variables. [3]
FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 19 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 14 R E F E R E N C E S
[1] Federal Communications Commission, ET Docket 93-62, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, Aug. 1996.
[2] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2005, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, 2006.
[3] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, Sept. 1992.
[4] ANSI/IEEE C95.3-2002, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave, New York: IEEE, December 2002.
[5]
IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 39 Standards Coordinating Committee 34 IEEE Std. 1528-2013, IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques.
[6] NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. Reprinted Feb. 1995.
[7] T. Schmid, O. Egger, N. Kuster, Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, Jan. 1996, pp. 105-113.
[8] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, N. Kuster, Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies, ICECOM97, Oct. 1997, pp. 1 -124.
[9] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, E-field Probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids, Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, June 23-25, 1996, pp. 172-175.
[10] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, Application Note: Data Storage and Evaluation, June 1998, p2.
[11] V. Hombach, K. Meier, M. Burkhardt, E. Kuhn, N. Kuster, The Dependence of EM Energy Absorption upon Human Modeling at 900 MHz, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44 no. 10, Oct. 1996, pp. 1865-
1873.
[12] N. Kuster and Q. Balzano, Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300MHz, IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 17-23.
[13] G. Hartsgrove, A. Kraszewski, A. Surowiec, Simulated Biological Materials for Electromagnetic Radiation Absorption Studies, University of Ottawa, Bioelectromagnetics, Canada: 1987, pp. 29-36.
[14] Q. Balzano, O. Garay, T. Manning Jr., Electromagnetic Energy Exposure of Simulated Users of Portable Cellular Telephones, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 44, no.3, Aug. 1995.
[15] W. Gander, Computermathematick, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992.
[16] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[17] N. Kuster, R. Kastle, T. Schmid, Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, May 1997, pp. 645-652. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 20 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019
[18] CENELEC CLC/SC111B, European Prestandard (prENV 50166-2), Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields High-
frequency: 10kHz-300GHz, Jan. 1995.
[19] Prof. Dr. Niels Kuster, ETH, Eidgenssische Technische Hoschschule Zrich, Dosimetric Evaluation of the Cellular Phone.
[20] IEC 62209-1, Measurement procedure for the assessment of specific absorption rate of human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Part 1: Devices used next to the ear (Frequency range of 300 MHz to 6 GHz), July 2016.
[21] Innovation, Science, Economic Development Canada RSS-102 Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands) Issue 5, March 2015.
[22] Health Canada Safety Code 6 Limits of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz 300 GHz, 2015
[23] FCC SAR Test Procedures for 2G-3G Devices, Mobile Hotspot and UMPC Devices KDB Publications 941225, D01-D07
[24] SAR Measurement Guidance for IEEE 802.11 Transmitters, KDB Publication 248227 D01
[25] FCC SAR Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas, KDB Publications 648474 D03-D04
[26] FCC SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers, FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04
[27] FCC SAR Measurement and Reporting Requirements for 100MHz 6 GHz, KDB Publications 865664 D01-D02
[28] FCC General RF Exposure Guidance and SAR Procedures for Dongles, KDB Publication 447498, D01-D02
[29] Anexo Resoluo No. 533, de 10 de Septembro de 2009.
[30] IEC 62209-2, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate
(SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz), Mar. 2010. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Document S/N:
Test Dates:
DUT Type:
1C1905130007-01-R1.BCG 06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch Approved by:
Quality Manager Page 21 of 21 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM. REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 A P P E N D I X A : S A R T E S T D A T A 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A2093; Type: Watch; Serial: D92YT01BMW62 Communication System: UID 0, IEEE 802.11b; Frequency: 2437 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Head; Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2437 MHz; = 1.806 S/m; r = 38.658; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 06-27-2019; Ambient Temp: 19.9C; Tissue Temp: 20.5C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3318; ConvF(4.59, 4.59, 4.59) @ 2437 MHz; Calibrated: 11/19/2018 Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1408; Calibrated: 8/14/2018 Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0; Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1936 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) Mode: IEEE 802.11b, 22 MHz Bandwidth, Head SAR, Ch 6, 1 Mbps, Front Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x8x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.876 V/m; Power Drift = -0.15 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.293 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.158 W/kg 0 dB = 0.195 W/kg = -7.10 dBW/kg A1 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A2093; Type: Watch; Serial: D92YT01DMW62 Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2402 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Head; Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2402 MHz; = 1.772 S/m; r = 37.94; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-18-2019; Ambient Temp: 22.1C; Tissue Temp: 21.4C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7490; ConvF(7.74, 7.74, 7.74) @ 2402 MHz; Calibrated: 1/24/2019 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1532; Calibrated: 1/15/2019 Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CA; Serial: 1275 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) Mode: Bluetooth, Head SAR, Ch 0, 1 Mbps, Front Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 6.538 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.123 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.068 W/kg 0 dB = 0.101 W/kg = -9.96 dBW/kg A2 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A2093; Type: Watch; Serial: D92YT01DMW62 Communication System: UID 0, IEEE 802.11b; Frequency: 2437 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Body; Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2437 MHz; = 2.019 S/m; r = 52.72; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 0.0 cm Test Date: 06-27-2019; Ambient Temp: 23.1C; Tissue Temp: 21.2C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7532; ConvF(7.66, 7.66, 7.66) @ 2437 MHz; Calibrated: 4/12/2019 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn501; Calibrated: 4/17/2019 Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CC; Serial: 1179 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) Mode: IEEE 802.11b, 22 MHz Bandwidth, Extremity SAR, Ch 6, 1 Mbps, Back Side, Aluminum, Metal Links Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.086 V/m; Power Drift = 0.16 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.392 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 0.084 W/kg 0 dB = 0.305 W/kg = -5.16 dBW/kg A3 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: BCG-A2093; Type: Watch; Serial: D92YT01DMW62 Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2480 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Body; Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2480 MHz; = 2.032 S/m; r = 50.988; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 0.0 cm Test Date: 07-18-2019; Ambient Temp: 22.9C; Tissue Temp: 21.8C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3318; ConvF(4.49, 4.49, 4.49) @ 2480 MHz; Calibrated: 11/19/2018 Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1408; Calibrated: 8/14/2018 Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0; Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1936 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) Mode: Bluetooth, Extremity SAR, Ch 78, 1 Mbps, Back Side, Aluminum, Sport Wrist Band Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.666 V/m; Power Drift = -0.07 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.176 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 0.028 W/kg 0 dB = 0.0951 W/kg = -10.22 dBW/kg A4 A P P E N D I X B : S Y S T E M V E R I F I C A T I O N 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Head Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 1.816 S/m; r = 38.64; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 06-27-2019; Ambient Temp: 19.9C; Tissue Temp: 20.5C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3318; ConvF(4.59, 4.59, 4.59) @ 2450 MHz; Calibrated: 11/19/2018 Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1408; Calibrated: 8/14/2018 Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0; Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1936 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 11.5 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 5.57 W/kg Deviation(1 g) = 4.90%
0 dB = 7.28 W/kg = 8.62 dBW/kg B1 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 750 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Head Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 1.808 S/m; r = 37.881; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-18-2019; Ambient Temp: 22.1C; Tissue Temp: 21.4C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7490; ConvF(7.74, 7.74, 7.74) @ 2450 MHz; Calibrated: 1/24/2019 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1532; Calibrated: 1/15/2019 Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CA; Serial: 1275 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 11.4 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 5.33 W/kg Deviation(1 g) = 0.38%
0 dB = 8.88 W/kg = 9.48 dBW/kg B2 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: 2450 MHz Body Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 2.032 S/m; r = 52.698; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 06-27-2019; Ambient Temp: 23.1C; Tissue Temp: 21.2C Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7532; ConvF(7.66, 7.66, 7.66) @ 2450 MHz; Calibrated: 4/12/2019 Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn501; Calibrated: 4/17/2019 Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CC; Serial: 1179 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 10.8 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 2.5 W/kg Deviation(10 g) = 5.04%
0 dB = 8.89 W/kg = 9.49 dBW/kg B3 PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 750 Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: BBB04 Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; = 2.004 S/m; r = 51.032; = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 1.0 cm Test Date: 07-18-2019; Ambient Temp: 22.9C; Tissue Temp: 21.8C Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3318; ConvF(4.49, 4.49, 4.49) @ 2450 MHz; Calibrated: 11/19/2018 Sensor-Surface: 3mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) Electronics: DAE4 Sn1408; Calibrated: 8/14/2018 Phantom: Twin-SAM V8.0; Type: QD 000 P41 Ax; Serial: 1936 Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7470) 2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW) Area Scan (8x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=12mm, dy=12mm Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 11.4 W/kg SAR(10 g) = 2.44 W/kg Deviation(10 g) = 1.24%
0 dB = 7.00 W/kg = 8.45 dBW/kg B4 A P P E N D I X C : P R O B E C A L I B R A T I O N 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. A P P E N D I X D : S A R T I S S U E S P E C I F I C A T I O N S Measurement Procedure for Tissue verification:
1) The network analyzer and probe system was configured and calibrated. 2) The probe was immersed in the tissue. The tissue was placed in a nonmetallic container. Trapped air bubbles beneath the flange were minimized by placing the probe at a slight angle. 3) The complex admittance with respect to the probe aperture was measured 4) The complex relative permittivity can be calculated from the below equation (Pournaropoulos and Misra):
where Y is the admittance of the probe in contact with the sample, the primed and unprimed coordinates refer to source and observation points, respectively,
, is the angular frequency, and
. Composition of the Tissue Equivalent Matter Figure D-1 Note: Liquid recipes are proprietary SPEAG. Since the composition is approximate to the actual liquids utilized, the manufacturer tissue-equivalent liquid data sheets are provided below. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Test Dates:
DUT Type:
06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX D:
Page 1 of 3 REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019
()=babarrdddrrjabjY02/10'020)(expcosln2+=cos2222r1=j Figure D-2 750 5800 MHz Body Tissue Equivalent Matter FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Test Dates:
DUT Type:
06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX D:
Page 2 of 3 REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 Figure D-3 750 5800 MHz Head Tissue Equivalent Matter FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Test Dates:
DUT Type:
06/27/2019 07/18/2019 Watch 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX D:
Page 3 of 3 REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 A P P E N D I X E : S A R S Y S T E M V A L I D A T I O N Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D02v01r02, SAR system validation status should be documented to confirm measurement accuracy. The SAR systems (including SAR probes, system components and software versions) used for this device were validated against its performance specifications prior to the SAR measurements. Reference dipoles were used with the required tissue- equivalent media for system validation, according to the procedures outlined in FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013. Since SAR probe calibrations are frequency dependent, each probe calibration point was validated at a frequency within the valid frequency range of the probe calibration point, using the system that normally operates with the probe for routine SAR measurements and according to the required tissue-equivalent media. A tabulated summary of the system validation status including the validation date(s), measurement frequencies, SAR probes and tissue dielectric parameters has been included. Table E-1 SAR System Validation Summary 1g SAR System Validation Summary 10g Table E-2 NOTE: While the probes have been calibrated for both CW and modulated signals, all measurements were performed using communication systems calibrated for CW signals only. Modulations in the table above represent test configurations for which the measurement system has been validated per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 for scenarios when CW probe calibrations are used with other signal types. SAR systems were validated for modulated signals with a periodic duty cycle, such as GMSK, or with a high peak to average ratio (>5 dB), such as OFDM according to FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04. FCC ID: BCG-A2093 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Test Dates:
06/27/2019 07/18/2019 DUT Type:
Watch 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. Approved by:
Quality Manager APPENDIX E:
Page 1 of 1 REV 21.3 M 02/15/2019 COND.PERM.()(r)SENSITIVITYPROBE LINEARITYPROBE ISOTROPYMOD. TYPEDUTY FACTORPARAM224506/17/20197490EX3DV42450Head1.78637.800PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSAM524504/16/20193318ES3DV32450Head1.86737.929PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSCW VALIDATIONMOD. VALIDATIONSAR SYSTEM #FREQ. [MHz]DATEPROBE SNPROBE TYPEPROBE CAL. POINTCOND.PERM.()(r)SENSITIVITYPROBE LINEARITYPROBE ISOTROPYMOD. TYPEDUTY FACTORPARAM424504/23/20197532EX3DV42450Body2.02750.762PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSAM5245012/10/20183318ES3DV32450Body2.04451.289PASSPASSPASSOFDM/TDDPASSPASSCW VALIDATIONMOD. VALIDATIONSAR SYSTEM #FREQ. [MHz]DATEPROBE SNPROBE TYPEPROBE CAL. POINT
This product uses the FCC Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the FCC