FCC ID: UK7-DW6A Smart Watch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIESEL On TOUCHSCREEN SMARTWATCH IDM BRI PRODUCT INFORMATION ENGLISH IMPORTANT HEALTH PRECAUTIONS IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS REGULATORY NOTICES STANDARD LIMITED WARRANTY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report No.: 180209C31 15 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 16 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 17 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 18 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 19 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 20 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 21 of 25 NFC Antenna WLAN / BT Antenna Report No.: 180209C31 22 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 23 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 24 of 25 Report No.: 180209C31 25 of 25

 

 

Report No.: 180420C29 Page 7 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 8 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 9 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 10 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 11 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 12 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 13 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 14 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 15 of 17 Report No.: 180420C29 Page 16 of 17 WLAN/BT Antenna NFC Antenna Report No.: 180420C29 Page 17 of 17

 

 

Report No.: 180420C33 Page 7 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 8 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 9 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 10 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 11 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 12 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 13 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 14 of 17 WLAN/BT Antenna NFC Antenna Report No.: 180420C33 Page 15 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 16 of 17 Report No.: 180420C33 Page 17 of 17

 

 

Report No.: 180209C22 11 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 12 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 13 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 14 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 15 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 16 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 17 of 21 NFC Antenna WLAN / BT Antenna Report No.: 180209C22 18 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 19 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 20 of 21 Report No.: 180209C22 21 of 21

 

 

CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Report No.: 180209C31 1 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 2 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 3 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 4 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 5 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 6 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 7 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 8 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 9 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 10 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 11 of 27 Report No.: 180209C31 12 of 27 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Report No.: 180420C29 13 of 27 Report No.: 180420C29 14 of 27 Report No.: 180420C29 15 of 27 Report No.: 180420C29 16 of 27 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Report No.: 180420C33 17 of 27 Report No.: 180420C33 18 of 27 Report No.: 180420C33 19 of 27 Report No.: 180420C33 20 of 27 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Report No.: 180209C22 21 of 27 Report No.: 180209C22 22 of 27 Report No.: 180209C22 23 of 27 Report No.: 180209C22 24 of 27 Report No.: 180209C22 25 of 27 Report No.: 180209C22 26 of 27 Report No.: 180209C22 27 of 27

 

 

1. FCC ID is applied by E-Label on device. Description of E-Label on the DW6A1 P a g e | 1 MENU

[STEP 2]

[STEP 3]

FCC ID

[STEP 1]

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Setting Menu Select System Select About Select Regulatory Information 2. FCC ID is applied on packaging Description of E-Label on the DW6A1 P a g e | 2 3. Instruction of E-Label in the Quick Start Guide (page 5)

 

 

1. FCC ID is applied by E-Label on device. Description of E-Label on the DW6B1 P a g e | 1 MENU

[STEP 2]

[STEP 3]

FCC ID

[STEP 1]

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Setting Menu Select System Select About Select Regulatory Information 2. FCC ID is applied on packaging Description of E-Label on the DW6B1 P a g e | 2 3. Instruction of E-Label in the Quick Start Guide (page 16)

 

 

1. FCC ID is applied by E-Label on device. Description of E-Label on the DW6D1 P a g e | 1 MENU

[STEP 2]

[STEP 3]

FCC ID

[STEP 1]

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Setting Menu Select System Select About Select Regulatory Information Description of E-Label on the DW6D1 P a g e | 2 2. FCC ID is applied on packaging 3. Instruction of E-Label in the Quick Start Guide (page 5)

 

 

1. FCC ID is applied by E-Label on device. Description of E-Label on the DW6F1 P a g e | 1 MENU

[STEP 2]

[STEP 3]

FCC ID

[STEP 1]

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Setting Menu Select System Select About Select Regulatory Information 2. FCC ID is applied on packaging Description of E-Label on the DW6F1 P a g e | 2 3. Instruction of E-Label in the Quick Start Guide (page 4)

 

 

May 7, 2018 Power of Attorney To Whom It May Concern:

Please be advised that I, Christopher King, have designated Ida Chen of Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch (BV CPS Taoyuan Branch) of Taiwan as the person being responsible for this project and to sign the form 731 and other documentation. Any and all acts carried out by Ida Chen of Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch (BV CPS Taoyuan Branch) of Taiwan on the matters relating to all processes required in the FCC approval and any communication needed with the national authority, shall have the same legal authority as acts on our own behalf. As defined in 47 CFR Ch. 1.2002 (b), we further certify that neither the applicant nor any party to this application is subject to a denial to Federal benefits, including FCC benefits, pursuant to section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act. This authorization is limited to the product of as following:

FCC ID: UK7-DW6A If you have any acknowledgement and response, please send it to Ida Chen of Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch (BV CPS Taoyuan Branch) of Taiwan directly. Should you have any question or comment regarding this matter, please have my best attention. Sincerely yours, Christopher King Vice President, Chief Compliance & Risk Officer Fossil Group, Inc. 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080 USA Email: regulatorycompliance@fossil.com Tel: 469-587-2628 Fax: 972-638-2771

 

 

Date: September 20, 2018 Class II Permissive Change FCC ID: UK7-DW6A We, Fossil Group, Inc., hereby declare that we are only and fully responsible for this CIIPC application of UK7-DW6A base on the grant issued on 06/28/2018. The major change is to enable WiFi 2.4G Channel 12 & 13 by software without any hardware change. The source code/SW file about this SW enabling will ONLY be held by Fossil Group, Inc. and it is IMPOSSIBLE to release these source code/SW file to any other third party to affect the RF function, power, or rating of this device. Except for the changes mentioned above, no other modification is performed. Should you have any question, please contact me directly. Thank you!

Sincerely, _________________________ Christopher King / Vice President, Chief Compliance & Risk Officer Fossil Group, Inc. Tel: 469-587-2628 Fax: 972-638-2708 E-mail: regulatorycompliance@fossil.com

 

 

Date: October 2, 2018 Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road - Gate A Columbia, Maryland 21046 Operational Description Subject: Request for Confidentiality FCC ID: UK7-DW6A To Whom It May Concern, Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of Commissions rules (47CFR0.457, 0.459), we are requesting the Commission to withhold the following attachments as confidential document from public disclosure indefinitely. Above mentioned document contains detailed system and equipment description are considered as proprietary information in operation of the equipment. The public disclosure of above documents might be harmful to our company and would give competitor an unfair advantage in the market. In additional to above mentioned documents, pursuant to Public Notice DA 04-1705 of the Commission s policy, in order to comply with the marketing regulations in 47 CFT 2.803 and the importation rules in 47 CFR 2.1204, while ensuring that business sensitive information remains confidential until the actual marketing of newly authorized devices. We are requesting the commission to grant short-term confidentiality request on the following attachments until 180 days after the Grant Date of Equipment Authorizations. It is our understanding that all measurement test reports, FCC ID label format and correspondent during certification review process cannot be granted as confidential documents and those information will be available for public review once the grant of equipment authorization is issued. Best Regards, Test Setup Photos Christopher King / Vice President, Chief Compliance & Risk Officer Fossil Group, Inc. Tel: 469-587-2628 Fax: 972-638-2708 E-mail: regulatorycompliance@fossil.com

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report Variant FCC SAR Test Report Report No.

: SA180209C22B Applicant

: Fossil Group, Inc. Address Product FCC ID

: 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

: Smart Watch

: UK7-DW6A Model No.

: DW6F1 Series Model

: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Standards

: FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093), IEEE C95.1:1992, IEEE Std 1528:2013 KDB 865664 D01 v01r04, KDB 865664 D02 v01r02 KDB 248227 D01 v02r02, KDB 447498 D01 v06 Sample Received Date

: Sep. 18, 2018 Date of Testing

: Sep. 26, 2018 Lab Address

: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Test Location

: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil, Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan (R.O.C) CERTIFICATION: The above equipment have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lin Kou Laboratories, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples SAR characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Prepared By :

Approved By :

Evonne Liu / Specialist Gordon Lin / Assistant Manager This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 1 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table of Contents 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.1 3.2 Release Control Record ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Description of Equipment Under Test ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. SAR Measurement System ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) ............................................................................................................... 6 SPEAG DASY52 System ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.1 Robot.................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Probes ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) .................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.4 Phantoms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.5 Device Holder ................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids ................................................................................................................................. 11 SAR System Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 14 SAR Measurement Procedure ................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods ................................................................................................................................... 16 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 EUT Configuration and Setting ................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Testing Position .................................................................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 19 Tissue Verification ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 System Validation ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4 4.5 System Verification ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.6 Maximum Output Power ............................................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power ................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result ................................................................................................................. 21 SAR Testing Results .................................................................................................................................................. 22 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations ................................................................................................................ 22 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) ............................................ 23 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) ....................................... 23 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability ........................................................................................................................... 24 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation .......................................................................................... 24 5. Calibration of Test Equipment ............................................................................................................................................ 25 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories ........................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup 4.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 2 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Release Control Record Report No. Reason for Change SA180209C22B Initial release Date Issued Oct. 02, 2018 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 3 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value Equipment Class Mode DTS 2.4G WLAN Note:

Highest SAR-1g Face Tested at 10 mm

(W/kg) 0.07 Highest SAR-10g Extremity Tested at 0 mm

(W/kg) 0.15 1. The SAR criteria (Head & Body: SAR-1g 1.6 W/kg, and Extremity: SAR-10g 4.0 W/kg) for general population /

uncontrolled exposure is specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2 (2.1093) and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 4 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 2. Description of Equipment Under Test EUT Type FCC ID Model Name Series Model Tx Frequency Bands

(Unit: MHz) Uplink Modulations Maximum Tune-up Conducted Power

(Unit: dBm) Antenna Type EUT Stage Note:

Smart Watch UK7-DW6A DW6F1 DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 WLAN : 2412 ~ 2472 Bluetooth : 2402 ~ 2480 802.11b : DSSS 802.11g/n : OFDM Bluetooth : GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK Please refer to section 4.6.1 of this report Loop Antenna Identical Prototype 1. This report is issued as supplementary reports are as below. The difference compared with original report is adding ch12/13. Therefore, the test only verified on worst case of the original report for ch12 and ch13. 2. All models are listed as below. Sample Model Original Report 1 2 3 4 DW6F1 180209C23 DW6A1 180209C32 DW6B1 180420C29 DW6D1 180420C33 WLAN / BT GPS Antenna Antenna Gain Gain

-7.03 dBi

-7.22 dBi

-8.86 dBi

-7.76 dBi

-5.6 dBi

-5.67 dBi

-7.12 dBi

-5.75 dBi 3. The EUT accessories list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. Description The models have the same layout, circuit, and components, but different appearance & brand. 4. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description please refers to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. 5. Since the maximum rated output power remains the same or lower on the two new channels (12 and 13) as the power declared for channels 1 11 in the original filing, RF Exposure (SAR) testing does not need to be reported for this permissive change. We are requesting that the details of the change, with limited scope test reports as required under KDB 178919 Section I. B to demonstrate that the changes have not degraded the EMC or rf exposure levels from the original filing, therefore, verification measurements documented in this report is to confirm that SAR values are lower than originally reported and that the proposed change is a Class 1 change with respect to RF exposure . Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 5 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3. SAR Measurement System 3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in an object exposed to a radio field. The SAR distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and general population/uncontrolled, based on a persons awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrolled. The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given density (). The equation description is as below:

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg) SAR measurement can be related to the electrical field in the tissue by Where: is the conductivity of the tissue, is the mass density of the tissue and E is the RMS electrical field strength. 3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System DASY52 system consists of high precision robot, probe alignment sensor, phantom, robot controller, controlled measurement server and near-field probe. The robot includes six axes that can move to the precision position of the DASY52 software defined. The DASY52 software can define the area that is detected by the probe. The robot is connected to controlled box. Controlled measurement server is connected to the controlled robot box. The DAE includes amplifier, signal multiplexing, AD converter, offset measurement and surface detection. It is connected to the Electro-optical coupler (ECO). The ECO performs the conversion form the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the PC. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 6 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Fig-3.1 SPEAG DASY52 System Setup 3.2.1 Robot The DASY52 system uses the high precision robots from Stubli SA (France). For the 6-axis controller system, the robot controller version of CS8c from Stubli is used. The Stubli robot series have many features that are important for our application:

High precision (repeatability 0.035 mm) High reliability (industrial design) Jerk-free straight movements Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Fig-3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System Page No.

: 7 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.2 Probes The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe. The probe is specially designed and calibrated for use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid at different frequency. Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions EX3DV4 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 6 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.5 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 10 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 W/g) Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm) Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm ES3DV3 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Interleaved sensors. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 4 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.0 mm ET3DV6 Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection system. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE) 10 MHz to 2.3 GHz; Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.4 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g; Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 16 mm) Tip diameter: 6.8 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 8 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) Model Construction Measurement Range Input Offset Voltage Input Bias Current Dimensions 3.2.4 Phantoms DAE3, DAE4 Signal amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter and control logic. Serial optical link for communication with DASY embedded system (fully remote controlled). Two step probe touch detector for mechanical surface detection and emergency robot stop.

-100 to +300 mV (16 bit resolution and two range settings: 4mV, 400mV)

< 5V (with auto zero)

< 50 fA 60 x 60 x 68 mm Model Twin SAM Construction The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by teaching three points with the robot. Material Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) Shell Thickness 2 0.2 mm (6 0.2 mm at ear point) Dimensions Length: 1000 mm Width: 500 mm Height: adjustable feet Filling Volume approx. 25 liters Model ELI Construction Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup, including all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with all SPEAG dosimetric probes and dipoles. Material Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) Shell Thickness 2.0 0.2 mm (bottom plate) Dimensions Major axis: 600 mm Minor axis: 400 mm Filling Volume approx. 30 liters Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 9 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.5 Device Holder Model Construction Mounting Device In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom or ELI4, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter device in spherical coordinates. Rotation point is the ear opening point. Transmitter devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked for positioning at different phantom sections (left head, right head, flat). Material POM Model Construction Laptop Extensions Kit Simple but effective and easy-to-use extension for Mounting Device that facilitates the testing of larger devices according to IEC 62209-2 (e.g., laptops, cameras, etc.). It is lightweight and fits easily on the upper part of the Mounting Device in place of the phone positioner. Material POM, Acrylic glass, Foam 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles Model Construction Frequency Return Loss D-Serial Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun. Enables measurement of feed point impedance with NWA. Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with tissue simulating solutions. 750 MHz to 5800 MHz

> 20 dB Power Capability

> 100 W (f < 1GHz), > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 10 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with homogeneous tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15 cm. For head SAR testing, the liquid height from the ear reference point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. For body SAR testing, the liquid height from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. The nominal dielectric values of the tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 5% are listed in Table-3.1. Photo of Liquid Height for Head Position Photo of Liquid Height for Body Position The dielectric properties of the head tissue simulating liquids are defined in IEEE 1528, and KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. For the body tissue simulating liquids, the dielectric properties are defined in KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using a dielectric assessment kit and a network analyzer. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 11 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table-3.1 Targets of Tissue Simulating Liquid Frequency

(MHz) Target Permittivity 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 41.9 41.5 41.5 40.5 40.3 40.1 40.0 40.0 40.0 39.5 39.2 39.0 37.9 36.0 35.9 35.6 35.5 35.3 55.5 55.2 55.0 54.0 53.8 53.4 53.3 53.3 53.3 52.9 52.7 52.5 51.3 49.0 48.9 48.6 48.5 48.2 Range of 5%

For Head 39.8 ~ 44.0 39.4 ~ 43.6 39.4 ~ 43.6 38.5 ~ 42.5 38.3 ~ 42.3 38.1 ~ 42.1 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 37.5 ~ 41.5 37.2 ~ 41.2 37.1 ~ 41.0 36.0 ~ 39.8 34.2 ~ 37.8 34.1 ~ 37.7 33.8 ~ 37.4 33.7 ~ 37.3 33.5 ~ 37.1 For Body 52.7 ~ 58.3 52.4 ~ 58.0 52.3 ~ 57.8 51.3 ~ 56.7 51.1 ~ 56.5 50.7 ~ 56.1 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.3 ~ 55.5 50.1 ~ 55.3 49.9 ~ 55.1 48.7 ~ 53.9 46.6 ~ 51.5 46.5 ~ 51.3 46.2 ~ 51.0 46.1 ~ 50.9 45.8 ~ 50.6 Target Conductivity 0.89 0.90 0.97 1.20 1.29 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.67 1.80 1.96 2.91 4.66 4.76 4.96 5.07 5.27 0.96 0.97 1.05 1.30 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.81 1.95 2.16 3.31 5.30 5.42 5.65 5.77 6.00 Range of 5%

0.85 ~ 0.93 0.86 ~ 0.95 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.14 ~ 1.26 1.23 ~ 1.35 1.30 ~ 1.44 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.59 ~ 1.75 1.71 ~ 1.89 1.86 ~ 2.06 2.76 ~ 3.06 4.43 ~ 4.89 4.52 ~ 5.00 4.71 ~ 5.21 4.82 ~ 5.32 5.01 ~ 5.53 0.91 ~ 1.01 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.00 ~ 1.10 1.24 ~ 1.37 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.42 ~ 1.56 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.72 ~ 1.90 1.85 ~ 2.05 2.05 ~ 2.27 3.14 ~ 3.48 5.04 ~ 5.57 5.15 ~ 5.69 5.37 ~ 5.93 5.48 ~ 6.06 5.70 ~ 6.30 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 12 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report The following table gives the recipes for tissue simulating liquids. Tissue Type H750 H835 H900 H1450 H1640 H1750 H1800 H1900 H2000 H2300 H2450 H2600 H3500 H5G B750 B835 B900 B1450 B1640 B1750 B1800 B1900 B2000 B2300 B2450 B2600 B3500 B5G Table-3.2 Recipes of Tissue Simulating Liquid Bactericide DGBE HEC NaCl Sucrose Triton X-100 Water Diethylene Glycol Mono-

hexylether 0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43.3 45.8 47.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.9 45.0 45.1 8.0

-

-

-

-

34.0 32.5 31.0 29.5 29.5 30.0 31.0 31.4 31.8 28.8

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.5 1.5 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2

-

0.8 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

-

56.0 57.0 58.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

48.8 48.5 48.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20.0 17.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 42.1 41.1 40.2 56.1 53.7 52.6 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.0 54.9 54.8 71.8 65.5 50.0 50.2 50.5 65.7 67.2 68.8 70.1 70.2 69.8 68.9 68.5 68.1 71.1 78.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 13 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.3 SAR System Verification The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is performed daily or before every SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurements in the flat section of the phantom with a matched dipole at a specified distance. The system verification setup is shown as below. Fig-3.3 System Verification Setup The validation dipole is placed beneath the flat phantom with the specific spacer in place. The distance spacer is touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking and be oriented parallel to the long side of the phantom. The spectrum analyzer measures the forward power at the location of the system check dipole connector. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power (250 mW is used for 700 MHz to 3 GHz, 100 mW is used for 3.5 GHz to 6 GHz) at the dipole connector and the power meter is read at that level. After connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter. After system check testing, the SAR result will be normalized to 1W forward input power and compared with the reference SAR value derived from validation dipole certificate report. The deviation of system check should be within 10 %. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 14 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure According to the SAR test standard, the recommended procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps:

(a) Power reference measurement

(b) Area scan

(c) Zoom scan

(d) Power drift measurement The SAR measurement procedures for each of test conditions are as follows:

(a) Make EUT to transmit maximum output power

(b) Measure conducted output power through RF cable

(c) Place the EUT in the specific position of phantom

(d) Perform SAR testing steps on the DASY system

(e) Record the SAR value 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure First Area Scan is used to locate the approximate location(s) of the local peak SAR value(s). The measurement grid within an Area Scan is defined by the grid extent, grid step size and grid offset. Next, in order to determine the EM field distribution in a three-dimensional spatial extension, Zoom Scan is required. The Zoom Scan is performed around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 10 g. According to KDB 865664 D01, the resolution for Area and Zoom scan is specified in the table below. Items Area Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(z) Zoom Scan Volume Note:

<= 2 GHz 2-3 GHz 3-4 GHz 4-5 GHz 5-6 GHz

<= 15 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 8 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 3 mm

<= 2 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 28 mm

>= 25 mm

>= 22 mm When zoom scan is required and report SAR is <= 1.4 W/kg, the zoom scan resolution of x / y (2-3GHz: <= 8 mm, 3-4GHz: <= 7 mm, 4-6GHz: <= 5 mm) may be applied. 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure The volume scan is used for assess overlapping SAR distributions for antennas transmitting in different frequency bands. It is equivalent to an oversized zoom scan used in standalone measurements. The measurement volume will be used to enclose all the simultaneous transmitting antennas. For antennas transmitting simultaneously in different frequency bands, the volume scan is measured separately in each frequency band. In order to sum correctly to compute the 1g aggregate SAR, the EUT remain in the same test position for all measurements and all volume scan use the same spatial resolution and grid spacing. When all volume scan were completed, the software, SEMCAD postprocessor can combine and subsequently superpose these measurement data to calculating the multiband SAR. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 15 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring All SAR testing is under the EUT install full charged battery and transmit maximum output power. In DASY measurement software, the power reference measurement and power drift measurement procedures are used for monitoring the power drift of EUT during SAR test. Both these procedures measure the field at a specified reference position before and after the SAR testing. The software will calculate the field difference in dB. If the power drift more than 5%, the SAR will be retested. 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the test standard. It can be conducted for 1g and 10g, as well as for user-specific masses. The DASY software includes all numerical procedures necessary to evaluate the spatial peak SAR value. The base for the evaluation is a "cube" measurement. The measured volume must include the 1g and 10g cubes with the highest averaged SAR values. For that purpose, the center of the measured volume is aligned to the interpolated peak SAR value of a previously performed area scan. The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The system always gives the maximum values for the 1g and 10g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest averaged SAR is divided into the following stages:

(a) Extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan

(b) Calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and measurement parameters)

(c) Generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume

(d) Interpolation of all measured values form the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid

(e) Extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface

(f) Calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods In DASY, the interpolation and extrapolation are both based on the modified Quadratic Shepards method. The interpolation scheme combines a least-square fitted function method and a weighted average method which are the two basic types of computational interpolation and approximation. Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and 10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5 mm. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 16 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation 4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting

<Considerations Related to WLAN for Setup and Testing>

In general, various vendor specific external test software and chipset based internal test modes are typically used for SAR measurement. These chipset based test mode utilities are generally hardware and manufacturer dependent, and often include substantial flexibility to reconfigure or reprogram a device. A Wi-Fi device must be configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools for SAR measurement. The test frequencies established using test mode must correspond to the actual channel frequencies. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. In addition, a periodic transmission duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR correctly. The reported SAR must be scaled to 100%

transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. According to KDB 248227 D01, this device has installed WLAN engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During WLAN SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. Initial Test Configuration An initial test configuration is determined for OFDM transmission modes in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands according to the channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate combination(s) with the highest maximum output power specified for production units in each standalone and aggregated frequency band. When the same maximum power is specified for multiple transmission modes in a frequency band, the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order 802.11a/g/n/ac mode is used for SAR measurement, on the highest measured output power channel in the initial test configuration, for each frequency band. Subsequent Test Configuration SAR measurement requirements for the remaining 802.11 transmission mode configurations that have not been tested in the initial test configuration are determined separately for each standalone and aggregated frequency band, in each exposure condition, according to the maximum output power specified for production units. Additional power measurements may be required to determine if SAR measurements are required for subsequent highest output power channels in a subsequent test configuration. When the highest reported SAR for the initial test configuration according to the initial test position or fixed exposure position requirements, is adjusted by the ratio of the subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration specified maximum output power and the adjusted SAR is 1.2 W/kg, SAR is not required for that subsequent test configuration. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 17 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report SAR Test Configuration and Channel Selection When multiple channel bandwidth configurations in a frequency band have the same specified maximum output power, the initial test configuration is using largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate, and lowest order 802.11 mode (i.e., 802.11a is chosen over 802.11n then 802.11ac or 802.11g is chosen over 802.11n). After an initial test configuration is determined, if multiple test channels have the same measured maximum output power, the channel chosen for SAR measurement is determined according to the following. 1) The channel closest to mid-band frequency is selected for SAR measurement. 2) For channels with equal separation from mid-band frequency; for example, high and low channels or two mid-band channels, the higher frequency (number) channel is selected for SAR measurement.

<Considerations Related to Bluetooth for Setup and Testing>

This device has installed Bluetooth engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During Bluetooth SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. 4.2 EUT Testing Position 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires 1-g SAR, and the wrist-worn condition requires 10-g extremity SAR. The 10-g extremity and 1-g SAR test exclusions may be applied to the wrist and face exposure conditions. When SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. SAR for wrist exposure is evaluated with the back of the devices positioned in direct contact against a flat phantom fill with body tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be unstrapped and touching the phantom. The space introduced by the watch or wrist bands and the phantom must be representative of actual use conditions. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 18 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires face SAR. When face SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 10 mm Fig-4.1 Illustration for Smart watch Setup 4.3 Tissue Verification The measuring results for tissue simulating liquid are shown as below. Test Date Sep. 26, 2018 Sep. 26, 2018 Note:

Tissue Type Head Body Frequency

(MHz) 2450 2450 Liquid Temp.

() 23.1 23.1 Measured Measured Target Target Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Deviation Deviation

() 1.881 2.022

(r) 38.071 52.505

() 1.8 1.95

(r) 39.2 52.7

(%) 4.50 3.69

(%)

-2.88

-0.37 The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquid must be measured within 24 hours before the SAR testing and within 5% of the target values. Liquid temperature during the SAR testing must be within 2 . Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 19 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.4 System Validation The SAR measurement system was validated according to procedures in KDB 865664 D01. The validation status in tabulated summary is as below. Test Date Sep. 26, 2018 Sep. 26, 2018 Probe S/N 3971 3898 Measured Measured Validation for CW Validation for Modulation Calibration Point Conductivity Permittivity Sensitivity Probe Probe Modulation

(r) Range Linearity Isotropy Type Duty Factor PAR Head Body 2450 2450

() 1.881 2.022 38.071 52.505 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass OFDM OFDM N/A N/A Pass Pass 4.5 System Verification The measuring result for system verification is tabulated as below. Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) SAR-1g

(W/kg) Sep. 26, 2018 Head 2450 52.30 12.9 Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-10g SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) Sep. 26, 2018 Body 2450 24.00 5.66 Note:

Normalized to 1W SAR-1g

(W/kg) 51.60 Normalized Deviation

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N

-1.34 869 3971 1431 to 1W Deviation SAR-10g

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N

(W/kg) 22.64

-5.67 869 3898 1277 Comparing to the reference SAR value provided by SPEAG, the validation data should be within its specification of 10 %. The result indicates the system check can meet the variation criterion and the plots can be referred to Appendix A of this report. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 20 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.6 Maximum Output Power 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power The maximum conducted average power (Unit: dBm) including tune-up tolerance is shown as below. Mode 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n HT20 Mode Bluetooth DH Bluetooth LE 2.4G WLAN 16.0 11.0 11.0 2.4G Bluetooth 13.0 4.0 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result The measuring conducted average power (Unit: dBm) is shown as below.

<WLAN 2.4G>

Mode Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power 802.11b

<Bluetooth>

1 6 11 12 13 2412 2437 2462 2467 2472 15.32 15.43 15.20 15.41 15.37 Mode Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power Bluetooth BDR/GFSK Bluetooth EDR/DPSK Bluetooth 2EDR/8DPSK Bluetooth LE 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 19 39 2402 2441 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 12.82 12.79 12.64 10.59 10.52 10.32 10.5 10.43 10.29 3.21 3.25 3.12 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 21 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7 SAR Testing Results 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations

<KDB 447498 D01, General RF Exposure Guidance>

Testing of other required channels within the operating mode of a frequency band is not required when the reported SAR for the mid-band or highest output power channel is:

(1) 0.8 W/kg or 2.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 100 MHz

(2) 0.6 W/kg or 1.5 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is between 100 MHz and 200 MHz

(3) 0.4 W/kg or 1.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 200 MHz

<KDB 248227 D01, SAR Guidance for Wi-Fi Transmitters>

(1) For handsets operating next to ear, hotspot mode or mini-tablet configurations, the initial test position procedures were applied. The test position with the highest extrapolated peak SAR will be used as the initial test position. When the reported SAR of initial test position is <= 0.4 W/kg, SAR testing for remaining test positions is not required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the subsequent highest peak SAR positions until the reported SAR result is <= 0.8 W/kg or all test positions are measured.

(2) For WLAN 2.4 GHz, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. When the reported SAR is <= 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel. For OFDM modes (802.11g/n), SAR is not required when the highest reported SAR for DSSS is adjusted by the ratio of OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2 W/kg. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 22 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) Plot No. Band Mode WLAN2.4G 802.11b 01 WLAN2.4G 802.11b WLAN2.4G 802.11b 02 WLAN2.4G 802.11b WLAN2.4G 802.11b 03 WLAN2.4G 802.11b 04 WLAN2.4G 802.11b WLAN2.4G 802.11b Test Position Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face Ch. Sample Duty Cycle 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 2 2 3 3 4 4 1 1 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 Crest Factor 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.41 15.37 15.41 15.37 15.41 15.37 15.41 15.37 Scaling Factor 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.16 Power Drift

(dB)

-0.08

-0.05

-0.08

-0.01

-0.13 0.01 0.12

-0.03 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.025 0.029 0.023 0.025 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.048 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.06 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Sample Duty Cycle WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 05 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 06 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 07 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 08 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 2 2 3 3 4 4 1 1 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 Crest Factor 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.41 15.37 15.41 15.37 15.41 15.37 15.41 15.37 Scaling Factor Power Drift

(dB) Measured SAR-10g Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.16 1.15 1.16 0.09 0.00 0.09

-0.10 0.13 0.01

-0.15 0.05 0.048 0.053 0.117 0.122 0.12 0.125 0.099 0.096 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.11 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 23 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability According to KDB 865664 D01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency band, which is determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media are required for SAR measurements in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures should be applied to the tissue medium with the highest measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. Alternatively, if the highest measured SAR for both head and body tissue-equivalent media are 1.45 W/kg and the ratio of these highest SAR values, i.e., largest divided by smallest value, is 1.10, the highest SAR configuration for either head or body tissue-equivalent medium may be used to perform the repeated measurement. These additional measurements are repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device should be returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it is re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated results. Since all the measured SAR are less than 0.8 W/kg, the repeated measurement is not required. 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation There is no simultaneous transmission configuration in this device. Test EngineerKevin Yao Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 24 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 5. Calibration of Test Equipment Equipment Manufacturer Model System Validation Dipole Dosimetric E-Field Probe Dosimetric E-Field Probe Data Acquisition Electronics Data Acquisition Electronics Spectrum Analyzer ENA Series Network Analyzer MXG Analong Signal Generator Vector Signal Generator Power Meter Power Sensor Thermometer Twin SAM Phantom Twin SAM Phantom SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG R&S Agilent Agilent Anritsu Anritsu Anritsu YFE SPEAG SPEAG SN 869 3898 3971 1431 1277 Cal. Date Cal. Interval Jun. 19, 2018 Jun. 26, 2018 Mar. 26, 2018 Mar. 16, 2018 Jan. 18, 2018 D2450V2 EX3DV4 EX3DV4 DAE4 DAE4 FSL6 E5071C N5181A 102006 Mar. 23, 2018 MY46214281 Jun. 08, 2018 MY50143868 Jul. 03, 2018 MG3710A 6201599977 Mar. 16, 2018 ML2495A MA2411B YF-160A QD 000 P40 CD QD 000 P40 CD 1218009 1207252 Jul. 03, 2018 Jul. 03, 2018 130504591 Mar. 23, 2018 1652 1653 N/A N/A 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year N/A N/A Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 25 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Taiwan HwaYa EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab:

Add: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-318-3232 Fax: 886-3-327-0892 Taiwan LinKo EMC/RF Lab:

Add: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-2-2605-2180 Fax: 886-2-2605-1924 Taiwan HsinChu EMC/RF Lab:

Add: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-593-5343 Fax: 886-3-593-5342 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.adt.com.tw The road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

---END---

Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 Page No.

: 26 of 26 Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification The plots for system verification with largest deviation for each SAR system combination are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 System Check_H2450_180926 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 869 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 1.881 S/m; r = 38.071; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 21.8 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 103.8 V/m; Power Drift = -0.05 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 26.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 12.9 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.97 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 21.7 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 System Check_B2450_180926 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 869 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 2.022 S/m; r = 52.505; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3898; ConvF(7.61, 7.61, 7.61); Calibrated: 2018/06/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1277; Calibrated: 2018/01/18

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.8 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 97.96 V/m; Power Drift = -0.11 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 25.2 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 12.2 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.66 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 18.8 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement The SAR plots for highest measured SAR in each exposure configuration, wireless mode and frequency band combination, and measured SAR > 1.5 W/kg are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P01 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch13_Sample DW6A1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2472 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: H19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2472 MHz; = 1.903 S/m; r = 37.993; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0955 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 7.429 V/m; Power Drift = -0.05 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.115 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.029 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.022 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0930 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P02 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch13_Sample DW6B1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2472 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: H19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2472 MHz; = 1.903 S/m; r = 37.993; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0820 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 6.199 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0780 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.025 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.012 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0637 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P03 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch13_Sample DW6D1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2472 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: H19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2472 MHz; = 1.903 S/m; r = 37.993; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.102 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.782 V/m; Power Drift = 0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.170 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.051 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.027 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.100 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P04 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch12_Sample DW6F1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2467 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: H19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2467 MHz; = 1.898 S/m; r = 38.011; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0856 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 6.513 V/m; Power Drift = 0.12 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0970 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.055 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.029 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0742 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P05 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch13_Sample DW6A1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2472 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: B19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2472 MHz; = 2.047 S/m; r = 52.444; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3898; ConvF(7.61, 7.61, 7.61); Calibrated: 2018/06/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1277; Calibrated: 2018/01/18

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.292 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 15.24 V/m; Power Drift = 0.00 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.227 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.114 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.053 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.180 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P06 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch13_Sample DW6B1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2472 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: B19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2472 MHz; = 2.047 S/m; r = 52.444; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3898; ConvF(7.61, 7.61, 7.61); Calibrated: 2018/06/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1277; Calibrated: 2018/01/18

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.547 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 16.24 V/m; Power Drift = -0.10 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.590 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.257 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.122 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.445 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P07 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch13_Sample DW6D1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2472 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: B19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2472 MHz; = 2.047 S/m; r = 52.444; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3898; ConvF(7.61, 7.61, 7.61); Calibrated: 2018/06/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1277; Calibrated: 2018/01/18

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.375 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 15.51 V/m; Power Drift = 0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.797 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.292 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.125 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.554 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/09/26 P08 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch12_Sample DW6F1 DUT: 180918C10 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2467 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1.03 Medium: B19T27N1_0926 Medium parameters used: f = 2467 MHz; = 2.041 S/m; r = 52.459; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.1 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3898; ConvF(7.61, 7.61, 7.61); Calibrated: 2018/06/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1277; Calibrated: 2018/01/18

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.590 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 14.53 V/m; Power Drift = -0.15 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.659 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.259 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.099 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.480 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole The SPEAG calibration certificates are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Issued Date

: Oct. 02, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of EUT>

<Antenna Location>

WLAN/BT Antenna The separation distance for antenna to edge:

<EUT Front View>

Antenna WLAN / BT Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08 To Top Side To Bottom Side To Left Side To Right Side

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0 FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of SAR Setup>

Front Face of EUT at 10 mm Rear Face_Neck of EUT at 0 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22B Reference No.: 180918C08

 

 

PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST FCC ID: UK7-DW6A 1 RADIATED EMISSION TEST BELOW 1GHz

(Z-Plane) 2 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A RADIATED EMISSION TEST ABOVE 1GHz

(Z-Plane) 3 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A FCC ID: UK7-DW6A 4

 

 

Variant FCC Test Report Report No.: RF180209C22A FCC ID: UK7-DW6A Test Model: DW6F1 Series Model: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Received Date: Feb. 09, 2018 Test Date: Jul. 23, 2018 ~ Sep. 21, 2018 Issued Date: Oct. 02, 2018 Applicant: Fossil Group, Inc. Address: 901 S. Central Expwy., Richardson, TX 75080 USA Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lab Address: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan

( R.O.C ) Test Location: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. FCC Registration /

Designation Number:

788550 / TW0003 This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 1 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Certificate of Conformity ........................................................................................................................... 5 2 Summary of Test Results ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Modification Record .............................................................................................................................. 6 3 General Information ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 General Description of EUT .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Description of Test Modes ..................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail .................................................................... 9 3.3 Duty Cycle of Test Signal .................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Description of Support Units ................................................................................................................ 11 3.4.1 Configuration of System under Test .......................................................................................... 11 3.5 General Description of Applied Standards ........................................................................................... 11 4 Test Types and Results ............................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement .............................................................................. 12 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement ..................................................... 12 4.1.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.3 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 14 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 15 4.1.5 Test Set Up ............................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 16 4.1.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 17 4.2 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement ............................................................................................................ 29 4.2.1 Limits of 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement ................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 29 4.2.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 29 4.2.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 29 4.2.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 30 4.3 Occupied Bandwidth Measurement .................................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 31 4.3.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.3 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 31 4.3.5 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 31 4.3.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 32 4.4 Conducted Output Power Measurement ............................................................................................ 33 4.4.1 Limits of Conducted Output Power Measurement.................................................................... 33 4.4.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 33 4.4.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 33 4.4.4 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 33 4.4.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 33 4.4.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 33 4.4.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 34 4.5 Power Spectral Density Measurement ............................................................................................... 35 4.5.1 Limits of Power Spectral Density Measurement ....................................................................... 35 4.5.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 35 4.5.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 35 4.5.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 35 4.5.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 35 4.5.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 35 4.5.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 36 Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 2 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6 Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement ............................................................................... 37 4.6.1 Limits of Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement ....................................................... 37 4.6.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 37 4.6.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 37 4.6.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 37 4.6.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 37 4.6.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 37 4.6.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 38 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements................................................................................................................ 41 Annex A- Band-edge measurement ............................................................................................................. 42 Appendix Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................ 45 Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 3 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Issue No. Description RF180209C22A Original Release Release Control Record Date Issued Oct. 02, 2018 Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 4 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 1 Certificate of Conformity Product: Smart Watch Test Model: DW6F1 Series Model: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Sample Status:

Identical Prototype Applicant: Fossil Group, Inc. Test Date: Jul. 23, 2018 ~ Sep. 21, 2018 Standards: 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) ANSI C63.10:2013 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples RF characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by :

, Date:

Oct. 02, 2018 Approved by

:

Gina Liu / Specialist

, Date:

Oct. 02, 2018 Dylan Chiou / Project Engineer Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 5 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 2 Summary of Test Results FCC Clause 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) Test Item Result Remarks 15.207 AC Power Conducted Emission N/A Refer to Note 15.205 /

15.209 /

15.247(d) 15.247(d) Radiated Emissions and Band Edge Measurement Meet the requirement of limit. Pass Minimum passing margin is -1.9 dB at 2483.50 MHz. Antenna Port Emission Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.247(a)(2) 6 dB Bandwidth Pass Meet the requirement of limit.

---

Occupied Bandwidth Measurement Pass Reference only 15.247(b) Conducted power Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.247(e) Power Spectral Density Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.203 Antenna Requirement Pass No antenna connector is used. 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2:

Measurement Frequency Radiated Emissions up to 1 GHz Radiated Emissions above 1 GHz 30 MHz ~ 200 MHz 200 MHz ~ 1000 MHz 1 GHz ~ 18 GHz 18 GHz ~ 40 GHz Expended Uncertainty

(k=2) () 2.93 dB 2.95 dB 2.26 dB 1.94 dB 2.2 Modification Record There were no modifications required for compliance. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 6 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3 General Information 3.1 General Description of EUT Product Test Model Series Model Status of EUT Smart Watch DW6F1 DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Identical Prototype Power Supply Rating Modulation Type 5 Vdc (host equipment or adapter or cradle) 3.8 Vdc (battery) CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK for DSSS 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK for OFDM Modulation Technology DSSS, OFDM 802.11b: 11.0 / 5.5 / 2.0 / 1.0 Mbps Transfer Rate 802.11g: 54.0 / 48.0 / 36.0 / 24.0 / 18.0 / 12.0 / 9.0 / 6.0 Mbps 802.11n: up to 72.2 Mbps Operating Frequency 2412 ~ 2472 MHz Number of Channel 13 for 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n (HT20) Output Power Antenna Type Antenna Connector 102.329 mW Loop antenna N/A Accessory Device Refer to Note as below Data Cable Supplied Refer to Note as below Note:

1. This report is issued as a supplementary report to BV CPS report no. RF180209C22. The difference compared with original report is adding channel 12 and 13. Except test item of AC Power Conducted Emission, other test items were re-tested in this report. 2. All models are listed as below. Model DW6F1 DW6A1 DW6B1 DW6D1 2.4G / BT Antenna Gain (dBi) GPS

-5.6

-5.67

-7.12

-5.75

-7.03

-7.22

-8.86

-7.76 Description The models have the same layout, circuit, LCD panel and components, but different appearance & brand. Therefore, only DW6F1 was chosen for worst test. 3. The EUT provide one completed transmitter and one receiver. Modulation Mode Tx Function 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n (HT20) 1TX 1TX 1TX 4. The EUTs accessories list refers to Ext. Pho. 5. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refers to the manufacturer's specifications or user's manual. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 7 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.2 Description of Test Modes 13 channels are provided for 802.11b, 802.11g and 802.11n (HT20):

Channel Frequency (MHz) Channel Frequency (MHz) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2412 2417 2422 2427 2432 2437 2442 8 9 10 11 12 13 2447 2452 2457 2462 2467 2472 Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 8 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail EUT Configure Mode Applicable To RE1G RE<1G PLC APCM Description

-

-

-

-

Where RE1G: Radiated Emission above 1 GHz RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1 GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission APCM: Antenna Port Conducted Measurement NOTE: The EUT had been pre-tested on the positioned of each 3 axis. The worst case was found when positioned on Z-plane. NOTE: -means no effect. Radiated Emission Test (Above 1 GHz):

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode

-

-

-

Mode 802.11b 802.11g Available Channel 1 to 13 1 to 13 802.11n (HT20) 1 to 13 Tested Channel Modulation Technology Modulation Type Data Rate

(Mbps) 12, 13 12, 13 12, 13 DSSS OFDM OFDM DBPSK BPSK BPSK 1.0 6.0 6.5 Bandedge Measurement:

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode

-

-

-

Mode 802.11b 802.11g Available Channel 1 to 13 1 to 13 802.11n (HT20) 1 to 13 Tested Channel Modulation Technology Modulation Type Data Rate

(Mbps) 12, 13 12, 13 12, 13 DSSS OFDM OFDM DBPSK BPSK BPSK 1.0 6.0 6.5 Antenna Port Conducted Measurement:

This item includes all test value of each mode, but only includes spectrum plot of worst value of each mode. Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. Mode 802.11b 802.11g Available Channel 1 to 13 1 to 13 802.11n (HT20) 1 to 13 Tested Channel Modulation Technology Modulation Type Data Rate

(Mbps) 12, 13 12, 13 12, 13 DSSS OFDM OFDM DBPSK BPSK BPSK 1.0 6.0 6.5 EUT Configure Mode

-

-

-

Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 9 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Test Condition:

Applicable To Environmental Conditions Input Power RE1G APCM 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 3.8 Vdc 3.3 Duty Cycle of Test Signal Tested by Greg Lin Gavin Wu 802.11b: Duty cycle = 8.25/8.46 = 0.975, Duty factor = 10 * log(1/0.975) = 0.11 802.11g: Duty cycle = 1.36/1.563 = 0.87, Duty factor = 10 * log(1/0.87) = 0.60 802.11n (HT20): Duty cycle = 1.272/1.474 = 0.863, Duty factor = 10 * log(1/0.863) = 0.64 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n (HT20) Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 10 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.4 Description of Support Units The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. No. 1. No. Product Adapter Brand HTC Model No. TC U250 Serial No. N/A FCC ID N/A Signal Cable Description Of The Above Support Units 1. USB cable 115 cm Note:

1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m). 3.4.1 Configuration of System under Test

*Test Table EUT

(Power from adapter) 3.5 General Description of Applied Standards The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards:

FCC Part 15, Subpart C (15.247) KDB 558074 D01 15.247 Meas Guidance v05 ANSI C63.10-2013 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 11 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4 Test Types and Results 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement Radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands must comply with the radiated emission limits specified as below table. Other emissions shall be at least 20 dB below the highest level of the desired power:

Frequencies

(MHz) 0.009 ~ 0.490 0.490 ~ 1.705 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 ~ 88 88 ~ 216 216 ~ 960 Above 960 Field Strength

(microvolts/meter) Measurement Distance

(meters) 2400/F (kHz) 24000/F (kHz) 30 100 150 200 500 300 30 30 3 3 3 3 NOTE:

1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. For frequencies above 1000 MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20 dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 12 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.2 Test Instruments Description &

Manufacturer Test Receiver KEYSIGHT Spectrum Analyzer ROHDE & SCHWARZ BILOG Antenna SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna SCHWARZBECK Model No. Serial No. Date of Calibration Due Date of Calibration N9038A MY55420137 Apr. 11, 2018 Apr. 10, 2019 FSU43 100115 Nov. 23, 2017 Nov. 22, 2018 VULB9168 9168-156 Nov. 29, 2017 Nov. 28, 2018 9120D 9120D-1169 Dec. 12, 2017 Dec. 13, 2018 BBHA 9170 9170-480 Dec. 01, 2017 Nov. 30, 2018 Loop Antenna EM-6879 269 8447D 2944A10638 Aug. 11, 2017 Sep. 07, 2018 Aug. 10, 2018 Sep. 06, 2019 Aug. 08, 2017 Aug. 07, 2018 Aug. 08, 2018 Aug. 07, 2019 Preamplifier Agilent

(Below 1GHz) Preamplifier Agilent

(Above 1GHz) RF signal cable HUBER+SUHNER RF signal cable HUBER+SUHNER&

EMCI RF signal cable WOKEN Software BV ADT Antenna Tower inn-co GmbH Antenna Tower Controller BV ADT Turn Table BV ADT Turn Table Controller BV ADT High Speed Peak Power Meter Anritsu Power Sensor Anritsu 8449B 3008A02367 Feb. 22, 2018 Feb. 21, 2019 SUCOFLEX 104 SUCOFLEX 104&EMC104-SM-

SM-8000 CABLE-CH9-(250 795/4) Aug. 08, 2017 Aug. 08, 2018 Aug. 07, 2018 Aug. 07, 2019 CABLE-CH9-02

(248780+171006) Jan. 15, 2018 Jan. 14, 2019 8D-FB Cable-CH9-01 Aug. 01, 2017 Jul. 31, 2018 Jul. 31, 2018 Jul. 30, 2019 ADT_Radiated_ V7.6.15.9.5 NA MA 4000 013303 AT100 AT93021702 TT100 TT93021702 SC100 SC93021702 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ML2495A 1012010 Aug. 15, 2017 Aug. 14, 2018 Sep. 05, 2018 Sep. 04, 2019 MA2411B 1126085 May 25, 2018 May 24, 2019 Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 9. 3. The horn antenna and preamplifier (model: 8449B) are used only for the measurement of emission frequency above 1 GHz if tested. 4. The FCC Designation Number is TW0003. The number will be varied with the Lab location and scope as attached. 5. The IC Site Registration No. is IC 7450F-9. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 13 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.3 Test Procedures For Radiated Emission below 30 MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter chamber room. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. Parallel, perpendicular, and ground-parallel orientations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Quasi-Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. Note:

1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 9 kHz at frequency below 30 MHz. For Radiated Emission above 30 MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters (for 30 MHz ~ 1 GHz) / 1.5 meters (for above 1 GHz) above the ground at 3 meter chamber room for test. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The height of antenna is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is below 1 GHz. f. The test-receiver system was set to peak and average detected function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is above 1 GHz. If the peak reading value also meets average limit, measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. Note:

1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120 kHz for Quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency below 1 GHz. 2. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and the video bandwidth is 3 MHz for Peak detection (PK) at frequency above 1 GHz. 3. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and the video bandwidth is 1/T

(Duty cycle < 98 %) or 10 Hz (Duty cycle 98 %) for Average detection (AV) at frequency above 1 GHz.

(11b: RBW = 1 MHz, VBW =10 Hz ; 11g: RBW = 1 MHz, VBW = 1 kHz ;

11n (HT20): RBW = 1 MHz, VBW = 1 kHz 4. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 14 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.1.5 Test Set Up

<Radiated Emission below 30 MHz>

1 m EUT&

Support Units 3 m Turn Table 80 cm Ground Plane Test Receiver

<Radiated Emission 30 MHz to 1 GHz>

3 m Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 15 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 10mAnt. Tower1-4m VariableTurn TableEUT& Support UnitsGround PlaneTest Receiver80cm

<Radiated Emission above 1 GHz>

EUT&

Support Units 3 m Ant. Tower 1-4 m Variable Turn Table Absorber 150 cm Ground Plane Test Receiver For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions a. Placed the EUT on a testing table. b. Use the software to control the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 16 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.7 Test Results Above 1 GHz Data 802.11b CHANNEL TX Channel 12 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2467.00 96.8 PK

*2467.00 2484.70 2484.70 4934.00 4934.00 93.1 AV 56.8 PK 46.7 AV 42.5 PK 29.2 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.2

-7.3

-31.5

-24.8 1.60 H 1.60 H 1.56 H 1.56 H 3.58 H 3.58 H 54 54 57 57 142 142 65.10 61.40 25.10 15.00 40.90 27.60 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.60 1.60 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 17 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 12 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2467.00 92.1 PK

*2467.00 2483.50 2483.50 4934.00 4934.00 88.5 AV 56.2 PK 44.4 AV 41.3 PK 28.1 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.8

-9.6

-32.7

-25.9 3.86 V 3.86 V 3.73 V 3.73 V 2.19 V 2.19 V 152 152 162 162 298 298 60.40 56.80 24.50 12.70 39.70 26.50 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.60 1.60 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 18 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 13 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2472.00 97.0 PK

*2472.00 2486.70 2486.70 4944.00 4944.00 93.4 AV 58.6 PK 51.0 AV 42.3 PK 29.0 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-15.4

-3.0

-31.7

-25.0 1.73 H 1.73 H 1.52 H 1.52 H 3.42 H 3.42 H 51 51 60 60 128 128 65.30 61.70 26.90 19.30 40.60 27.30 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.70 1.70 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 19 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 13 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2472.00 91.2 PK

*2472.00 2486.70 2486.70 4944.00 4944.00 87.6 AV 57.2 PK 47.3 AV 41.3 PK 28.3 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-16.8

-6.7

-32.7

-25.7 3.90 V 3.90 V 3.80 V 3.80 V 2.06 V 2.06 V 189 189 159 159 281 281 59.50 55.90 25.50 15.60 39.60 26.60 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.70 1.70 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 20 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 802.11g CHANNEL TX Channel 12 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2467.00 94.3 PK

*2467.00 2483.50 2483.50 4934.00 4934.00 84.1 AV 62.3 PK 46.3 AV 42.3 PK 29.1 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-11.7

-7.7

-31.7

-24.9 1.90 H 1.90 H 2.22 H 2.22 H 3.16 H 3.16 H 59 59 67 67 125 125 62.60 52.40 30.60 14.60 40.70 27.50 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.60 1.60 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 21 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 12 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2467.00 90.4 PK

*2467.00 2483.50 2483.50 4934.00 4934.00 80.2 AV 56.2 PK 44.1 AV 41.4 PK 28.3 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.8

-9.9

-32.6

-25.7 2.84 V 2.84 V 2.77 V 2.77 V 1.93 V 1.93 V 143 143 135 135 302 302 58.70 48.50 24.50 12.40 39.80 26.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.60 1.60 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 22 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 13 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2472.00 94.5 PK

*2472.00 2483.50 2483.50 4944.00 4944.00 83.9 AV 69.4 PK 51.8 AV 42.5 PK 29.1 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-4.6

-2.2

-31.5

-24.9 1.62 H 1.62 H 1.52 H 1.52 H 3.31 H 3.31 H 55 55 60 60 137 137 62.80 52.20 37.70 20.10 40.80 27.40 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.70 1.70 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 23 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 13 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2472.00 90.3 PK

*2472.00 2483.50 2483.50 4944.00 4944.00 80.0 AV 66.5 PK 49.2 AV 41.4 PK 28.3 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-7.5

-4.8

-32.6

-25.7 2.97 V 2.97 V 3.11 V 3.11 V 2.42 V 2.42 V 162 162 173 173 297 297 58.60 48.30 34.80 17.50 39.70 26.60 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.70 1.70 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 24 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 802.11n (20MHz) CHANNEL TX Channel 12 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2467.00 94.5 PK

*2467.00 2483.50 2483.50 4934.00 4934.00 84.3 AV 64.1 PK 48.3 AV 42.2 PK 29.0 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-9.9

-5.7

-31.8

-25.0 1.55 H 1.55 H 1.61 H 1.61 H 3.23 H 3.23 H 73 73 76 76 127 127 62.80 52.60 32.40 16.60 40.60 27.40 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.60 1.60 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 25 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 12 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2467.00 90.9 PK

*2467.00 2483.50 2483.50 4934.00 4934.00 80.5 AV 60.9 PK 45.8 AV 41.1 PK 28.2 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-13.1

-8.2

-32.9

-25.8 2.68 V 2.68 V 2.56 V 2.56 V 2.33 V 2.33 V 129 129 135 135 304 304 59.20 48.80 29.20 14.10 39.50 26.60 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.60 1.60 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 26 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 13 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2472.00 93.6 PK

*2472.00 2483.50 2483.50 4944.00 4944.00 83.6 AV 69.3 PK 52.1 AV 42.2 PK 29.0 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-4.7

-1.9

-31.8

-25.0 1.50 H 1.50 H 1.53 H 1.53 H 3.42 H 3.42 H 49 49 63 63 158 158 61.90 51.90 37.60 20.40 40.50 27.30 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.70 1.70 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 27 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 13 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2472.00 90.0 PK

*2472.00 2483.50 2483.50 4944.00 4944.00 79.9 AV 66.4 PK 49.5 AV 41.0 PK 28.1 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-7.6

-4.5

-33.0

-25.9 2.76 V 2.76 V 2.84 V 2.84 V 2.58 V 2.58 V 133 133 122 122 283 283 58.30 48.20 34.70 17.80 39.30 26.40 31.70 31.70 31.70 31.70 1.70 1.70 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 28 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.2 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement 4.2.1 Limits of 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement The minimum of 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement is 0.5 MHz. 4.2.2 Test Setup EUT Attenuator Spectrum Analyzer 4.2.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.2.4 Test Procedure a. Set resolution bandwidth (RBW) = 100 kHz b. Set the video bandwidth (VBW) 3 x RBW, Detector = Peak. c. Trace mode = max hold. d. Sweep = auto couple. e. Measure the maximum width of the emission that is constrained by the frequencies associated with the two amplitude points (upper and lower) that are attenuated by 6 dB relative to the maximum level measured in the fundamental emission 4.2.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.2.6 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 29 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass / Fail Pass Pass 4.2.7 Test Results 802.11b Channel Frequency (MHz) 12 13 802.11g 2467 2472 6 dB Bandwidth Minimum Limit

(MHz) 9.01 8.60

(MHz) 0.5 0.5 Channel Frequency (MHz) 12 13 2467 2472 6 dB Bandwidth Minimum Limit

(MHz) 16.42 16.42

(MHz) 0.5 0.5 802.11n (HT20) Channel Frequency (MHz) 12 13 2467 2472 6 dB Bandwidth Minimum Limit

(MHz) 17.64 17.63

(MHz) 0.5 0.5 Spectrum Plot of Worst Value 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n (HT20) Page No. 30 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 4.3 Occupied Bandwidth Measurement 4.3.1 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.3.2 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.3.3 Test Procedure The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer through an attenuator. The bandwidth of the fundamental frequency was measured by spectrum analyzer with resolution bandwidth in the range of 1 % to 5 % of the anticipated emission bandwidth, and a video bandwidth at least 3x the resolution bandwidth and set the detector to PEAK. The width of a frequency band such that, below the lower and above the upper frequency limits, the mean powers emitted are each equal to a specified percentage 0.5 % of the total mean power of a given emission. 4.3.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.3.5 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 31 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.3.6 Test Results 802.11b Channel Frequency (MHz) Occupied Bandwidth (MHz) Pass / Fail 12 13 802.11g 2467 2472 13.08 13.08 Pass Pass Channel Frequency (MHz) Occupied Bandwidth (MHz) Pass / Fail 12 13 2467 2472 16.92 17.02 Pass Pass 802.11n (HT20) Channel Frequency (MHz) Occupied Bandwidth (MHz) Pass / Fail 12 13 2467 2472 18.08 18.08 Pass Pass Spectrum Plot of Worst Value 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n (HT20) Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 32 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.4 Conducted Output Power Measurement 4.4.1 Limits of Conducted Output Power Measurement For systems using digital modulation in the 24002483.5 MHz bands: 1 Watt (30 dBm) 4.4.2 Test Setup EUT Attenuator Power Sensor Power Meter 4.4.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.4.4 Test Procedures A peak power sensor was used on the output port of the EUT. A power meter was used to read the response of the peak power sensor. Record the power level. 4.4.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.4.6 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 33 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.4.7 Test Results 802.11b Channel 12 13 802.11g Channel 12 13 802.11n (HT20) Channel 12 13 Frequency Peak Power Peak Power

(MHz) 2467 2472

(mW) 65.464 64.565

(dBm) 18.16 18.10 Frequency Peak Power Peak Power

(MHz) 2467 2472

(mW) 101.625 96.828

(dBm) 20.07 19.86 Frequency Peak Power Peak Power

(MHz) 2467 2472

(mW) 92.045 89.536

(dBm) 19.64 19.52 Limit

(dBm) 30 30 Limit

(dBm) 30 30 Limit

(dBm) 30 30 Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass / Fail Pass Pass Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 34 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.5 Power Spectral Density Measurement 4.5.1 Limits of Power Spectral Density Measurement The Maximum of Power Spectral Density Measurement is 8 dBm. 4.5.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.5.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.5.4 Test Procedure a. Set analyzer center frequency to DTS channel center frequency. b. Set the span to 1.5 times the DTS bandwidth. c. Set the RBW to: 3 kHz RBW 100 kHz. d. Set the VBW 3 RBW. e. Detector = peak. f. Sweep time = auto couple. g. Trace mode = max hold. h. Allow trace to fully stabilize. i. Use the peak marker function to determine the maximum amplitude level within the RBW. 4.5.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.5.6 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 35 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.5.7 Test Results 802.11b Channel 12 13 802.11g Channel 12 13 802.11n (HT20) Channel Frequency

(MHz) PSD Limit

(dBm/3 kHz)

(dBm/3 kHz) Pass / Fail 2467 2472

-7.36

-7.11 8 8 Pass Pass Frequency

(MHz) PSD Limit

(dBm/3 kHz)

(dBm/3 kHz) Pass / Fail 2467 2472

-16.67

-16.55 8 8 Pass Pass Frequency

(MHz) PSD Limit

(dBm/3 kHz)

(dBm/3 kHz) Pass / Fail 12 13 2467 2472

-17.13

-16.88 8 8 Pass Pass Spectrum Plot of Worst Value 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n (HT20) Page No. 36 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 4.6 Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement 4.6.1 Limits of Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement Below -20 dB of the highest emission level of operating band (in 100 kHz Resolution Bandwidth). 4.6.2 Test Setup EUT 4.6.3 Test Instruments Attenuator Spectrum Analyzer Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.6.4 Test Procedure MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE REF 1. Set the RBW = 100 kHz. 2. Set the VBW 300 kHz. 3. Detector = peak. 4. Sweep time = auto couple. 5. Trace mode = max hold. 6. Allow trace to fully stabilize. 7. Use the peak marker function to determine the maximum power level in any 100 kHz band segment within the fundamental EBW. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE OOBE 1. Set RBW = 100 kHz. 2. Set VBW 300 kHz. 3. Detector = peak. 4. Sweep = auto couple. 5. Trace Mode = max hold. 6. Allow trace to fully stabilize. 7. Use the peak marker function to determine the maximum amplitude level. 4.6.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.6.6 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 37 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6.7 Test Results The spectrum plots are attached on the following images. D1 line indicates the highest level, and D2 line indicates the 20 dB offset below D1. It shows compliance with the requirement. 802.11b Ch 12 Ch 13 Ch 13 Band Edge Ch 12 Band Edge Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 38 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 802.11g Ch 12 Ch 13 Ch 13 Band Edge Ch 12 Band Edge Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 39 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 802.11n (HT20) Ch 12 Ch 13 Ch 13 Band Edge Ch 12 Band Edge Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 40 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 41 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Annex A- Band-edge measurement 802.11b Horizontal (Peak) Horizontal (Average) Ch 12 Horizontal (Peak) Horizontal (Average) Ch 13 Note: The EUT had been pre-test on the positioned of Horizontal and Vertical. The worst case was found when positioned on Horizontal. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 42 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 802.11g Horizontal (Peak) Horizontal (Average) Ch 12 Horizontal (Peak) Horizontal (Average) Ch 13 Note: The EUT had been pre-test on the positioned of Horizontal and Vertical. The worst case was found when positioned on Horizontal. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 43 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 802.11n (HT20) Horizontal (Peak) Horizontal (Average) Ch 12 Horizontal (Peak) Horizontal (Average) Ch 13 Note: The EUT had been pre-test on the positioned of Horizontal and Vertical. The worst case was found when positioned on Horizontal. Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 44 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Appendix Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are FCC recognized accredited test firms and accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Linko EMC/RF Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-3-6668323 The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

--- END ---

Report No.: RF180209C22A Reference No.: 180913C01 Page No. 45 / 45 Report Format Version: 6.1.1

 

 

May 7, 2018 Declaration To Whom It May Concern:

This is a WLAN/Bluetooth combination antenna with FCC ID: UK7-DW6A. This WLAN/Bluetooth co-existence mechanism is to ensure that the WLAN and Bluetooth transmitters would not simultaneously operate. Therefore, WLAN and Bluetooth antenna in FCC ID: UK7-DW6A should not be considered to be able to transmit simultaneously. Though the users can use WLAN and Bluetooth simultaneously, but the real situation is that WLAN and Bluetooth are used by time sharing and no overlap transmission. Should you have any question, please have my best attention. Sincerely yours, Christopher King Vice President, Chief Compliance & Risk Officer Fossil Group, Inc. 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080 USA Email: regulatorycompliance@fossil.com Tel: 469-587-2628 Fax: 972-638-2771

 

 

June 8, 2018 Attestation Letter TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

We, Fossil Group, Inc. declared our product, Smart Watch, model numbers DW6F1, DW6A1, DW6D1 and DW6B1 contained an identical PCBA. The only differences between these models are the color, strap material, and the chassis. These differentials are mainly for marketing purpose, there is no change in radio frequency, conducted RF output power, radio frequency circuitry, and functional capabilities, the only difference is the antenna gain for each model and they are as below:

Model DW6A1 DW6B1 DW6D1 DW6F1 BT/BT4.2/WLAN

-7.22 dBi

-8.86 dBi

-7.76 dBi

-7.03 dBi Sincerely yours, Christopher King Vice President, Chief Compliance & Risk Officer Fossil Group, Inc. 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080 USA Email: regulatorycompliance@fossil.com Tel: 469-587-2628 Fax: 972-638-2771

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole The SPEAG calibration certificates are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report FCC SAR Test Report Report No.

: SA180209C31 Applicant

: Fossil Group, Inc. Address Product FCC ID Model No. Standards

: 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

: Smart Watch

: UK7-DW6A

: DW6A1

: FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093), IEEE C95.1:1992, IEEE Std 1528:2013 KDB 865664 D01 v01r04, KDB 865664 D02 v01r02 KDB 248227 D01 v02r02, KDB 447498 D01 v06 Sample Received Date

: Feb. 09, 2018 Date of Testing

: Mar. 15, 2018 Lab Address

: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Test Location

: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil, Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan (R.O.C) CERTIFICATION: The above equipment have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lin Kou Laboratories, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples SAR characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Prepared By :

Evonne Liu / Specialist Approved By :

Eli Hsu / Senior Engineer This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 1 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table of Contents 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.1 3.2 Release Control Record ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Description of Equipment Under Test ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. SAR Measurement System ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) ............................................................................................................... 6 SPEAG DASY52 System ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.1 Robot.................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Probes ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) .................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.4 Phantoms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.5 Device Holder ................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids ................................................................................................................................. 11 SAR System Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 14 SAR Measurement Procedure ................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods ................................................................................................................................... 16 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 EUT Configuration and Setting ................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Testing Position .................................................................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 19 Tissue Verification ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 System Validation ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4 4.5 System Verification ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.6 Maximum Output Power ............................................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power ................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result ................................................................................................................. 21 SAR Testing Results .................................................................................................................................................. 22 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations ................................................................................................................ 22 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) ............................................ 23 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) ....................................... 23 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation .......................................................................................... 23 5. Calibration of Test Equipment ............................................................................................................................................ 24 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories ........................................................................................................................... 25 Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup 4.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 2 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Release Control Record Report No. Reason for Change SA180209C31 Initial release Date Issued May 30, 2018 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 3 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value Equipment Class DTS DSS Note:

Mode 2.4G WLAN Bluetooth Highest SAR-1g Face Tested at 10 mm

(W/kg) 0.04 0.04 Highest SAR-10g Extremity Tested at 0 mm

(W/kg) 0.09 0.03 1. The SAR criteria (Head & Body: SAR-1g 1.6 W/kg, and Extremity: SAR-10g 4.0 W/kg) for general population /

uncontrolled exposure is specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2 (2.1093) and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 4 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 2. Description of Equipment Under Test EUT Type FCC ID Model Name Tx Frequency Bands

(Unit: MHz) Uplink Modulations Maximum Tune-up Conducted Power

(Unit: dBm) Antenna Type EUT Stage Note:

Smart Watch UK7-DW6A DW6A1 WLAN : 2412 ~ 2462 Bluetooth : 2402 ~ 2480 802.11b : DSSS 802.11g/n : OFDM Bluetooth : GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK Please refer to section 4.6.1 of this report Loop Antenna

(Peak Antenna Gain : -7.22 dBi for 2.4GHz) Identical Prototype 1. The EUT accessories list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. 2. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description please refers to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 5 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3. SAR Measurement System 3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in an object exposed to a radio field. The SAR distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and general population/uncontrolled, based on a persons awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrolled. The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given density (). The equation description is as below:

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg) SAR measurement can be related to the electrical field in the tissue by Where: is the conductivity of the tissue, is the mass density of the tissue and E is the RMS electrical field strength. 3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System DASY52 system consists of high precision robot, probe alignment sensor, phantom, robot controller, controlled measurement server and near-field probe. The robot includes six axes that can move to the precision position of the DASY52 software defined. The DASY52 software can define the area that is detected by the probe. The robot is connected to controlled box. Controlled measurement server is connected to the controlled robot box. The DAE includes amplifier, signal multiplexing, AD converter, offset measurement and surface detection. It is connected to the Electro-optical coupler (ECO). The ECO performs the conversion form the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the PC. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 6 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Fig-3.1 SPEAG DASY52 System Setup 3.2.1 Robot The DASY52 system uses the high precision robots from Stubli SA (France). For the 6-axis controller system, the robot controller version of CS8c from Stubli is used. The Stubli robot series have many features that are important for our application:

High precision (repeatability 0.035 mm) High reliability (industrial design) Jerk-free straight movements Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Fig-3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System Page No.

: 7 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.2 Probes The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe. The probe is specially designed and calibrated for use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid at different frequency. Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions EX3DV4 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 6 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.5 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 10 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 W/g) Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm) Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm ES3DV3 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Interleaved sensors. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 4 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.0 mm ET3DV6 Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection system. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE) 10 MHz to 2.3 GHz; Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.4 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g; Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 16 mm) Tip diameter: 6.8 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 8 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) Model Construction Measurement Range Input Offset Voltage Input Bias Current Dimensions 3.2.4 Phantoms DAE3, DAE4 Signal amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter and control logic. Serial optical link for communication with DASY embedded system (fully remote controlled). Two step probe touch detector for mechanical surface detection and emergency robot stop.

-100 to +300 mV (16 bit resolution and two range settings: 4mV, 400mV)

< 5V (with auto zero)

< 50 fA 60 x 60 x 68 mm Model Twin SAM Construction The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by teaching three points with the robot. Material Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) Shell Thickness 2 0.2 mm (6 0.2 mm at ear point) Dimensions Length: 1000 mm Width: 500 mm Height: adjustable feet Filling Volume approx. 25 liters Model ELI Construction Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup, including all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with all SPEAG dosimetric probes and dipoles. Material Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) Shell Thickness 2.0 0.2 mm (bottom plate) Dimensions Major axis: 600 mm Minor axis: 400 mm Filling Volume approx. 30 liters Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 9 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.5 Device Holder Model Construction Mounting Device In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom or ELI4, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter device in spherical coordinates. Rotation point is the ear opening point. Transmitter devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked for positioning at different phantom sections (left head, right head, flat). Material POM Model Construction Laptop Extensions Kit Simple but effective and easy-to-use extension for Mounting Device that facilitates the testing of larger devices according to IEC 62209-2 (e.g., laptops, cameras, etc.). It is lightweight and fits easily on the upper part of the Mounting Device in place of the phone positioner. Material POM, Acrylic glass, Foam 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles Model Construction Frequency Return Loss D-Serial Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun. Enables measurement of feed point impedance with NWA. Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with tissue simulating solutions. 750 MHz to 5800 MHz

> 20 dB Power Capability

> 100 W (f < 1GHz), > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 10 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with homogeneous tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15 cm. For head SAR testing, the liquid height from the ear reference point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. For body SAR testing, the liquid height from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. The nominal dielectric values of the tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 5% are listed in Table-3.1. Photo of Liquid Height for Head Position Photo of Liquid Height for Body Position The dielectric properties of the head tissue simulating liquids are defined in IEEE 1528, and KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. For the body tissue simulating liquids, the dielectric properties are defined in KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using a dielectric assessment kit and a network analyzer. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 11 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table-3.1 Targets of Tissue Simulating Liquid Frequency

(MHz) Target Permittivity 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 41.9 41.5 41.5 40.5 40.3 40.1 40.0 40.0 40.0 39.5 39.2 39.0 37.9 36.0 35.9 35.6 35.5 35.3 55.5 55.2 55.0 54.0 53.8 53.4 53.3 53.3 53.3 52.9 52.7 52.5 51.3 49.0 48.9 48.6 48.5 48.2 Range of 5%

For Head 39.8 ~ 44.0 39.4 ~ 43.6 39.4 ~ 43.6 38.5 ~ 42.5 38.3 ~ 42.3 38.1 ~ 42.1 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 37.5 ~ 41.5 37.2 ~ 41.2 37.1 ~ 41.0 36.0 ~ 39.8 34.2 ~ 37.8 34.1 ~ 37.7 33.8 ~ 37.4 33.7 ~ 37.3 33.5 ~ 37.1 For Body 52.7 ~ 58.3 52.4 ~ 58.0 52.3 ~ 57.8 51.3 ~ 56.7 51.1 ~ 56.5 50.7 ~ 56.1 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.3 ~ 55.5 50.1 ~ 55.3 49.9 ~ 55.1 48.7 ~ 53.9 46.6 ~ 51.5 46.5 ~ 51.3 46.2 ~ 51.0 46.1 ~ 50.9 45.8 ~ 50.6 Target Conductivity 0.89 0.90 0.97 1.20 1.29 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.67 1.80 1.96 2.91 4.66 4.76 4.96 5.07 5.27 0.96 0.97 1.05 1.30 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.81 1.95 2.16 3.31 5.30 5.42 5.65 5.77 6.00 Range of 5%

0.85 ~ 0.93 0.86 ~ 0.95 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.14 ~ 1.26 1.23 ~ 1.35 1.30 ~ 1.44 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.59 ~ 1.75 1.71 ~ 1.89 1.86 ~ 2.06 2.76 ~ 3.06 4.43 ~ 4.89 4.52 ~ 5.00 4.71 ~ 5.21 4.82 ~ 5.32 5.01 ~ 5.53 0.91 ~ 1.01 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.00 ~ 1.10 1.24 ~ 1.37 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.42 ~ 1.56 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.72 ~ 1.90 1.85 ~ 2.05 2.05 ~ 2.27 3.14 ~ 3.48 5.04 ~ 5.57 5.15 ~ 5.69 5.37 ~ 5.93 5.48 ~ 6.06 5.70 ~ 6.30 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 12 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report The following table gives the recipes for tissue simulating liquids. Tissue Type H750 H835 H900 H1450 H1640 H1750 H1800 H1900 H2000 H2300 H2450 H2600 H3500 H5G B750 B835 B900 B1450 B1640 B1750 B1800 B1900 B2000 B2300 B2450 B2600 B3500 B5G Table-3.2 Recipes of Tissue Simulating Liquid Bactericide DGBE HEC NaCl Sucrose Triton X-100 Water Diethylene Glycol Mono-

hexylether 0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43.3 45.8 47.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.9 45.0 45.1 8.0

-

-

-

-

34.0 32.5 31.0 29.5 29.5 30.0 31.0 31.4 31.8 28.8

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.5 1.5 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2

-

0.8 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

-

56.0 57.0 58.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

48.8 48.5 48.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20.0 17.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 42.1 41.1 40.2 56.1 53.7 52.6 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.0 54.9 54.8 71.8 65.5 50.0 50.2 50.5 65.7 67.2 68.8 70.1 70.2 69.8 68.9 68.5 68.1 71.1 78.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 13 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.3 SAR System Verification The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is performed daily or before every SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurements in the flat section of the phantom with a matched dipole at a specified distance. The system verification setup is shown as below. Fig-3.3 System Verification Setup The validation dipole is placed beneath the flat phantom with the specific spacer in place. The distance spacer is touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking and be oriented parallel to the long side of the phantom. The spectrum analyzer measures the forward power at the location of the system check dipole connector. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power (250 mW is used for 700 MHz to 3 GHz, 100 mW is used for 3.5 GHz to 6 GHz) at the dipole connector and the power meter is read at that level. After connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter. After system check testing, the SAR result will be normalized to 1W forward input power and compared with the reference SAR value derived from validation dipole certificate report. The deviation of system check should be within 10 %. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 14 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure According to the SAR test standard, the recommended procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps:

(a) Power reference measurement

(b) Area scan

(c) Zoom scan

(d) Power drift measurement The SAR measurement procedures for each of test conditions are as follows:

(a) Make EUT to transmit maximum output power

(b) Measure conducted output power through RF cable

(c) Place the EUT in the specific position of phantom

(d) Perform SAR testing steps on the DASY system

(e) Record the SAR value 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure First Area Scan is used to locate the approximate location(s) of the local peak SAR value(s). The measurement grid within an Area Scan is defined by the grid extent, grid step size and grid offset. Next, in order to determine the EM field distribution in a three-dimensional spatial extension, Zoom Scan is required. The Zoom Scan is performed around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 10 g. According to KDB 865664 D01, the resolution for Area and Zoom scan is specified in the table below. Items Area Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(z) Zoom Scan Volume Note:

<= 2 GHz 2-3 GHz 3-4 GHz 4-5 GHz 5-6 GHz

<= 15 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 8 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 3 mm

<= 2 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 28 mm

>= 25 mm

>= 22 mm When zoom scan is required and report SAR is <= 1.4 W/kg, the zoom scan resolution of x / y (2-3GHz: <= 8 mm, 3-4GHz: <= 7 mm, 4-6GHz: <= 5 mm) may be applied. 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure The volume scan is used for assess overlapping SAR distributions for antennas transmitting in different frequency bands. It is equivalent to an oversized zoom scan used in standalone measurements. The measurement volume will be used to enclose all the simultaneous transmitting antennas. For antennas transmitting simultaneously in different frequency bands, the volume scan is measured separately in each frequency band. In order to sum correctly to compute the 1g aggregate SAR, the EUT remain in the same test position for all measurements and all volume scan use the same spatial resolution and grid spacing. When all volume scan were completed, the software, SEMCAD postprocessor can combine and subsequently superpose these measurement data to calculating the multiband SAR. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 15 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring All SAR testing is under the EUT install full charged battery and transmit maximum output power. In DASY measurement software, the power reference measurement and power drift measurement procedures are used for monitoring the power drift of EUT during SAR test. Both these procedures measure the field at a specified reference position before and after the SAR testing. The software will calculate the field difference in dB. If the power drift more than 5%, the SAR will be retested. 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the test standard. It can be conducted for 1g and 10g, as well as for user-specific masses. The DASY software includes all numerical procedures necessary to evaluate the spatial peak SAR value. The base for the evaluation is a "cube" measurement. The measured volume must include the 1g and 10g cubes with the highest averaged SAR values. For that purpose, the center of the measured volume is aligned to the interpolated peak SAR value of a previously performed area scan. The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The system always gives the maximum values for the 1g and 10g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest averaged SAR is divided into the following stages:

(a) Extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan

(b) Calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and measurement parameters)

(c) Generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume

(d) Interpolation of all measured values form the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid

(e) Extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface

(f) Calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods In DASY, the interpolation and extrapolation are both based on the modified Quadratic Shepards method. The interpolation scheme combines a least-square fitted function method and a weighted average method which are the two basic types of computational interpolation and approximation. Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and 10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5 mm. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 16 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation 4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting

<Considerations Related to WLAN for Setup and Testing>

In general, various vendor specific external test software and chipset based internal test modes are typically used for SAR measurement. These chipset based test mode utilities are generally hardware and manufacturer dependent, and often include substantial flexibility to reconfigure or reprogram a device. A Wi-Fi device must be configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools for SAR measurement. The test frequencies established using test mode must correspond to the actual channel frequencies. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. In addition, a periodic transmission duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR correctly. The reported SAR must be scaled to 100%

transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. According to KDB 248227 D01, this device has installed WLAN engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During WLAN SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. Initial Test Configuration An initial test configuration is determined for OFDM transmission modes in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands according to the channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate combination(s) with the highest maximum output power specified for production units in each standalone and aggregated frequency band. When the same maximum power is specified for multiple transmission modes in a frequency band, the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order 802.11a/g/n/ac mode is used for SAR measurement, on the highest measured output power channel in the initial test configuration, for each frequency band. Subsequent Test Configuration SAR measurement requirements for the remaining 802.11 transmission mode configurations that have not been tested in the initial test configuration are determined separately for each standalone and aggregated frequency band, in each exposure condition, according to the maximum output power specified for production units. Additional power measurements may be required to determine if SAR measurements are required for subsequent highest output power channels in a subsequent test configuration. When the highest reported SAR for the initial test configuration according to the initial test position or fixed exposure position requirements, is adjusted by the ratio of the subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration specified maximum output power and the adjusted SAR is 1.2 W/kg, SAR is not required for that subsequent test configuration. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 17 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report SAR Test Configuration and Channel Selection When multiple channel bandwidth configurations in a frequency band have the same specified maximum output power, the initial test configuration is using largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate, and lowest order 802.11 mode (i.e., 802.11a is chosen over 802.11n then 802.11ac or 802.11g is chosen over 802.11n). After an initial test configuration is determined, if multiple test channels have the same measured maximum output power, the channel chosen for SAR measurement is determined according to the following. 1) The channel closest to mid-band frequency is selected for SAR measurement. 2) For channels with equal separation from mid-band frequency; for example, high and low channels or two mid-band channels, the higher frequency (number) channel is selected for SAR measurement.

<Considerations Related to Bluetooth for Setup and Testing>

This device has installed Bluetooth engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During Bluetooth SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. 4.2 EUT Testing Position 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires 1-g SAR, and the wrist-worn condition requires 10-g extremity SAR. The 10-g extremity and 1-g SAR test exclusions may be applied to the wrist and face exposure conditions. When SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. SAR for wrist exposure is evaluated with the back of the devices positioned in direct contact against a flat phantom fill with body tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be unstrapped and touching the phantom. The space introduced by the watch or wrist bands and the phantom must be representative of actual use conditions. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 18 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires face SAR. When face SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 10 mm Fig-4.1 Illustration for Smart watch Setup 4.3 Tissue Verification The measuring results for tissue simulating liquid are shown as below. Test Date Mar. 15, 2018 Mar. 15, 2018 Note:

Tissue Type Head Body Frequency

(MHz) 2450 2450 Liquid Temp.

() 23.4 23.4 Measured Measured Target Target Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Deviation Deviation

() 1.876 2.047

(r) 38.436 50.8

() 1.8 1.95

(r) 39.2 52.7

(%) 4.22 4.97

(%)

-1.95

-3.61 The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquid must be measured within 24 hours before the SAR testing and within 5% of the target values. Liquid temperature during the SAR testing must be within 2 . Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 19 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.4 System Validation The SAR measurement system was validated according to procedures in KDB 865664 D01. The validation status in tabulated summary is as below. Test Date Mar. 15, 2018 Mar. 15, 2018 Probe S/N 3578 3578 Measured Measured Validation for CW Validation for Modulation Calibration Point Conductivity Permittivity Sensitivity Probe Probe Modulation

(r) Range Linearity Isotropy Type Duty Factor PAR Head Body 2450 2450

() 1.876 2.047 38.436 50.8 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass OFDM OFDM N/A N/A Pass Pass 4.5 System Verification The measuring result for system verification is tabulated as below. Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) SAR-1g

(W/kg) Mar. 15, 2018 Head 2450 50.80 13.50 Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-10g SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) Mar. 15, 2018 Body 2450 23.40 5.44 Note:

Normalized to 1W SAR-1g

(W/kg) 54.00 Normalized Deviation

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N 6.30 737 3578 360 to 1W Deviation SAR-10g

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N

(W/kg) 21.76

-7.01 737 3578 360 Comparing to the reference SAR value provided by SPEAG, the validation data should be within its specification of 10 %. The result indicates the system check can meet the variation criterion and the plots can be referred to Appendix A of this report. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 20 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.6 Maximum Output Power 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power The maximum conducted average power (Unit: dBm) including tune-up tolerance is shown as below. Mode 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n HT20 Mode Bluetooth DH Bluetooth LE 2.4G WLAN 16.0 11.0 11.0 2.4G Bluetooth 13.0 4.0 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result The measuring conducted average power (Unit: dBm) is shown as below.

<WLAN 2.4G>

Mode 802.11b

<Bluetooth>

Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power 1 6 11 2412 2437 2462 15.32 15.43 15.2 Mode Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power Bluetooth BDR/GFSK Bluetooth EDR/DPSK Bluetooth 2EDR/8DPSK Bluetooth LE 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 19 39 2402 2441 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 12.82 12.79 12.64 10.59 10.52 10.32 10.5 10.43 10.29 3.21 3.25 3.12 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 21 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7 SAR Testing Results 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations

<KDB 447498 D01, General RF Exposure Guidance>

Testing of other required channels within the operating mode of a frequency band is not required when the reported SAR for the mid-band or highest output power channel is:

(1) 0.8 W/kg or 2.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 100 MHz

(2) 0.6 W/kg or 1.5 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is between 100 MHz and 200 MHz

(3) 0.4 W/kg or 1.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 200 MHz

<KDB 248227 D01, SAR Guidance for Wi-Fi Transmitters>

(1) For handsets operating next to ear, hotspot mode or mini-tablet configurations, the initial test position procedures were applied. The test position with the highest extrapolated peak SAR will be used as the initial test position. When the reported SAR of initial test position is <= 0.4 W/kg, SAR testing for remaining test positions is not required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the subsequent highest peak SAR positions until the reported SAR result is <= 0.8 W/kg or all test positions are measured.

(2) For WLAN 2.4 GHz, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. When the reported SAR is <= 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel. For OFDM modes (802.11g/n), SAR is not required when the highest reported SAR for DSSS is adjusted by the ratio of OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2 W/kg. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 22 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle 01 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face BDR BDR BDR BT BT BT 02 6 1 11 0 39 78 97.50 97.50 97.50 76.50 76.50 76.50 Crest Factor 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.43 15.32 15.20 12.82 12.79 12.64 Scaling Factor 1.14 1.17 1.20 1.04 1.05 1.09 Power Drift

(dB) 0.02

-0.05 0.02 0.03

-0.05 0.00 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.03 0.026 0.019 0.019 0.017 0.012 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Phantom Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) Scaling Factor Power Drift

(dB) Measured SAR-10g Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) WLAN 2.4G WLAN 2.4G WLAN 2.4G 03 WLAN 2.4G 802.11b 802.11b 802.11b 802.11b BT BT BT BT BDR BDR BDR BDR 04 Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Flat Flat Flat Neck Flat Flat Flat Neck 6 1 11 6 0 39 78 0 97.50 1.03 97.50 1.03 97.50 1.03 97.50 1.03 76.50 1.31 76.50 1.31 76.50 1.31 76.50 1.31 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0

-0.02 0.043 0.05 15.43 1.14 15.32 1.17 0.03 0.039 0.05 15.20 1.20 0.017 0.02

-0.1

-0.14 0.077 0.09 15.43 1.14

-0.05 0.013 0.02 12.82 1.04 0.012 0.02 12.79 1.05 12.64 1.09 0.05 0.00566 0.01 12.82 1.04 0.06 0.023 0.03 0 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability According to KDB 865664 D01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency band, which is determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media are required for SAR measurements in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures should be applied to the tissue medium with the highest measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. Alternatively, if the highest measured SAR for both head and body tissue-equivalent media are 1.45 W/kg and the ratio of these highest SAR values, i.e., largest divided by smallest value, is 1.10, the highest SAR configuration for either head or body tissue-equivalent medium may be used to perform the repeated measurement. These additional measurements are repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device should be returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it is re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated results. Since all the measured SAR are less than 0.8 W/kg, the repeated measurement is not required. 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation There is no simultaneous transmission configuration in this device. Test EngineerKevin Yao Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 23 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 5. Calibration of Test Equipment Equipment Manufacturer Model System Validation Dipole Dosimetric E-Field Probe Data Acquisition Electronics Spectrum Analyzer ENA Series Network Analyzer Vector Signal Generator Power Meter Power Sensor Thermometer Dielectric Assessment Kit SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG R&S Agilent Anritsu Anritsu Anritsu YFE SPEAG SN 737 3578 360 Cal. Date Cal. Interval Aug. 17, 2017 May. 05, 2017 Nov. 02, 2017 D2450V2 EX3DV4 DAE3 FSL6 102006 Mar. 27, 2017 E5071C MY46214281 Jun. 09, 2017 MG3710A 6201599977 Mar. 27, 2017 ML2495A MA2411B YF-160A DAK-3.5 1218009 1207252 Jul. 12, 2017 Jul. 12, 2017 130504591 Mar. 24, 2017 1047 Aug. 15, 2017 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 24 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Taiwan HwaYa EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab:

Add: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-318-3232 Fax: 886-3-327-0892 Taiwan LinKo EMC/RF Lab:

Add: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-2-2605-2180 Fax: 886-2-2605-1924 Taiwan HsinChu EMC/RF Lab:

Add: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-593-5343 Fax: 886-3-593-5342 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.adt.com.tw The road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

---END---

Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Page No.

: 25 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification The plots for system verification with largest deviation for each SAR system combination are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/15 System Check_H2450_180315 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0315 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 1.876 S/m; r = 38.436; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.44, 7.44, 7.44); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 23.1 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 107.5 V/m; Power Drift = -0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 28.8 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 13.5 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 6.16 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 23.1 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/15 System Check_B2450_180315 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0315 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 2.047 S/m; r = 50.8; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.43, 7.43, 7.43); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 18.6 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 90.84 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 22.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 11.6 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.44 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 19.1 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement The SAR plots for highest measured SAR in each exposure configuration, wireless mode and frequency band combination, and measured SAR > 1.5 W/kg are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/15 P01 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch6 DUT: 180209C32 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0315 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 1.863 S/m; r = 38.477; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.44, 7.44, 7.44); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0410 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.388 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0500 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.030 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.016 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0412 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/15 P02 BT_Front Face_10mm_Ch0 DUT: 180209C32 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0315 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.829 S/m; r = 38.599; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.44, 7.44, 7.44); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0265 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.743 V/m; Power Drift = 0.03 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0310 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.019 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.011 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0256 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/15 P03 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch6_Neck DUT: 180209C32 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0315 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 2.032 S/m; r = 50.836; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.43, 7.43, 7.43); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (91x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.330 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.287 V/m; Power Drift = -0.14 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.354 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.153 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.077 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.296 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/15 P04 BT_Rear Face_0mm_Ch0_Neck DUT: 180209C32 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0315 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.99 S/m; r = 50.939; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.43, 7.43, 7.43); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (91x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.103 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.200 V/m; Power Drift = 0.06 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.104 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.045 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.023 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0878 W/kg

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report FCC SAR Test Report Report No.

: SA180420C29 Applicant

: Fossil Group, Inc. Address Product FCC ID Model No. Standards

: 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

: Smart Watch

: UK7-DW6A

: DW6B1

: FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093), IEEE C95.1:1992, IEEE Std 1528:2013 KDB 865664 D01 v01r04, KDB 865664 D02 v01r02

, KDB 248227 D01 v02r02, KDB 447498 D01 v06 Sample Received Date

: Apr. 20, 2018 Date of Testing

: May 17, 2018 Lab Address

: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Test Location

: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil, Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan (R.O.C) CERTIFICATION: The above equipment have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lin Kou Laboratories, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples SAR characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agenc ies. Prepared By :

Approved By :

Rona Chen / Specialist Eli Hsu / Senior Engineer FCC Accredited No.: TW0003 This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified her ein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall s pecifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute yo ur unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unles s specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non -compliance to the specification. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 1 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table of Contents 4.1 4.2 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.2 Release Control Record ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Description of Equipment Under Test ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3. SAR Measurement Syste m ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) ..................................................................................................................... 6 SPEAG DASY52 System..................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Robot .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Probes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.4 Phantoms ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.5 Device Holder .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles....................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids........................................................................................................................................ 11 SAR System Verification .................................................................................................................................................... 14 SAR Measurement Procedure .......................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure ......................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation.................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 16 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Configuration and Setting.......................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Testing Position.......................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions............................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Tissue Verification .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 4.3 System Validation............................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4 4.5 System Verification ............................................................................................................................................................ 20 4.6 Maximum Output Power .................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power ....................................................................................................................... 21 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result....................................................................................................................... 21 SAR Testing Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm)............................................... 23 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) ......................................... 23 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability ................................................................................................................................. 24 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation ............................................................................................... 24 5. Calibration of Test Equipment ................................................................................................................................................... 25 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................................................................. 26 Appendix A. SAR Plots of Syste m Verification Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measure ment Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup 4.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 2 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Release Control Record Report No. Reason for Change SA180420C29 Initial releas e Date Issued May 30, 2018 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 3 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value Equipment Class Mode DTS DSS DXX Note:

2.4G WLAN Bluetooth NFC Highest SAR-1g Face Tested at 10 mm

(W/kg) 0.03 0.02 N/A Highest SAR-10g Extremity Tested at 0 mm

(W/kg) 0.14 0.07 N/A 1. The SAR criteria (Head & Body: SAR-1g 1.6 W/kg, and Extremity: SAR-10g 4.0 W/kg) for general population /

uncontrolled exposure is specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2 (2.1093) and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 4 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 2. Description of Equipment Under Test EUT Type FCC ID Model Name Tx Frequency Bands

(Unit: MHz) Uplink Modulations Maximum Tune-up Conducted Power

(Unit: dBm) Antenna Type EUT Stage Note:

Smart Watch UK7-DW6A DW6B1 WLAN : 2412 ~ 2462 Bluetooth : 2402 ~ 2480 NFC : 13.56 802.11b : DSSS 802.11/g/n : OFDM Bluetooth : GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK NFC : ASK Please refer to section 4.6.1 of this report Loop Antenna

(Peak Antenna Gain : -8.86 dBi for 2.4GHz) Identical Prototype 1. The EUT accessory list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. 2. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description please refers to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 5 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3. SAR Measurement System 3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in an object exposed to a radio field. The SAR distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and general population/uncontrolled, based on a persons awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrol led. The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given density (). The equation description is as below:

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg) SAR measurement can be related to the electrical field in the tissue by Where: is the conductivity of the tissue, is the mass density of the tissue and E is the RMS electrical field strength. 3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System DASY52 system consists of high precision robot, probe alignment sensor, phantom, robot controller, controlled measurement server and near-field probe. The robot includes six axes that can move to the precision position of the DASY52 software defined. The DASY52 software can define the area that is detected by the probe. The robot is connected to controlled box. Controlled measurement server is connected to the controlled robot box. The DAE includes amplifier, signal multiplexing, AD converter, offset measurement and surface detection. It is connected to the Electro-optical coupler (ECO). The ECO performs the conversion form the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the PC. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 6 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Fig-3.1 SPEAG DASY52 System Setup 3.2.1 Robot The DASY52 systems use the high precision robots from Stubli SA (France). For the 6-axis controller system, the robot controller version of CS8c from Stubli is used. The Stubli robot series have many features that are important for our application:

High precision (repeatability 0.035 mm) High reliability (industrial design) Jerk-free straight movements Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Fig-3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System Page No.

: 7 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.2 Probes The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe. The probe is specially designed and calibrated for use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid at different frequency. Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions EX3DV4 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 6 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.5 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 10 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 W/g) Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm) Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm ES3DV3 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Interleaved sensors. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 4 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.0 mm ET3DV6 Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection system. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE) 10 MHz to 2.3 GHz; Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.4 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g; Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 16 mm) Tip diameter: 6.8 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) Model Construction Measurement Range Input Offset Voltage Input Bias Current Dimensions DAE3, DAE4 Signal amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter and control logic. Serial optical link for communication with DASY embedded system (fully remote controlled). Two step probe touch detector for mechanical surface detection and emergency robot stop.

-100 to +300 mV (16 bit resolution and two range settings: 4mV, 400m V)

< 5 V (with auto zero)

< 50 fA 60 x 60 x 68 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 8 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.4 Phantoms Model Construction Material Shell Thickness Dimensions Filling Volume Model Construction Material Shell Thickness Dimensions Filling Volume Twin SAM The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by teaching three points with the robot. Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) 2 0.2 mm (6 0.2 mm at ear point) Length: 1000 mm Width: 500 mm Height: adjustable feet approx. 25 liters ELI Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup, including all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with all SPEAG dosimetric probes and dipoles. Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) 2.0 0.2 mm (bottom plate) Major axis: 600 mm Minor axis: 400 mm approx. 30 liters Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 9 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.5 Device Holder Model Construction Material Model Construction Mounting Device In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom or ELI4, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter device in spherical coordinates. Rotation point is the ear opening point. Transmitter devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked for positioning at different phantom sections (left head, right head, flat). POM Laptop Extensions Kit Simple but effective and easy-to-use extension for Mounting Device that facilitates the testing of larger devices according to IEC 62209-2 (e.g., laptops, cameras, etc.). It is lightweight and fits easily on the upper part of the Mounting Device in place of the phone positioner. Material POM, Acrylic glass, Foam 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles Model Construction Frequency Return Loss D-Serial Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun. Enables measurement of feed point impedance with NWA. Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with tissue simulating solutions. 750 MHz to 5800 MHz

> 20 dB Power Capability

> 100 W (f < 1GHz), > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 10 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with homogeneous tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15 cm. For head SAR testing, the liquid height from the ear reference point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. For body SAR testing, the liquid height from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. The nominal dielectric values of the tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 5% are listed in Table-3.1. Photo of Liquid Height for Head Position Photo of Liquid Height for Body Position The dielectric properties of the head tissue simulating liquids are defined in IEEE 1528, and KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. For the body tissue simulating liquids, the dielectric properties are defined in KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using a dielectric assessment kit and a network analyzer. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 11 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table-3.1 Targets of Tissue Simulating Liquid Frequency

(MHz) Target Permittivity 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 41.9 41.5 41.5 40.5 40.3 40.1 40.0 40.0 40.0 39.5 39.2 39.0 37.9 36.0 35.9 35.6 35.5 35.3 55.5 55.2 55.0 54.0 53.8 53.4 53.3 53.3 53.3 52.9 52.7 52.5 51.3 49.0 48.9 48.6 48.5 48.2 Range of 5%

For Head 39.8 ~ 44.0 39.4 ~ 43.6 39.4 ~ 43.6 38.5 ~ 42.5 38.3 ~ 42.3 38.1 ~ 42.1 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 37.5 ~ 41.5 37.2 ~ 41.2 37.1 ~ 41.0 36.0 ~ 39.8 34.2 ~ 37.8 34.1 ~ 37.7 33.8 ~ 37.4 33.7 ~ 37.3 33.5 ~ 37.1 For Body 52.7 ~ 58.3 52.4 ~ 58.0 52.3 ~ 57.8 51.3 ~ 56.7 51.1 ~ 56.5 50.7 ~ 56.1 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.3 ~ 55.5 50.1 ~ 55.3 49.9 ~ 55.1 48.7 ~ 53.9 46.6 ~ 51.5 46.5 ~ 51.3 46.2 ~ 51.0 46.1 ~ 50.9 45.8 ~ 50.6 Target Conductivity 0.89 0.90 0.97 1.20 1.29 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.67 1.80 1.96 2.91 4.66 4.76 4.96 5.07 5.27 0.96 0.97 1.05 1.30 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.81 1.95 2.16 3.31 5.30 5.42 5.65 5.77 6.00 Range of 5%

0.85 ~ 0.93 0.86 ~ 0.95 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.14 ~ 1.26 1.23 ~ 1.35 1.30 ~ 1.44 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.59 ~ 1.75 1.71 ~ 1.89 1.86 ~ 2.06 2.76 ~ 3.06 4.43 ~ 4.89 4.52 ~ 5.00 4.71 ~ 5.21 4.82 ~ 5.32 5.01 ~ 5.53 0.91 ~ 1.01 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.00 ~ 1.10 1.24 ~ 1.37 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.42 ~ 1.56 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.72 ~ 1.90 1.85 ~ 2.05 2.05 ~ 2.27 3.14 ~ 3.48 5.04 ~ 5.57 5.15 ~ 5.69 5.37 ~ 5.93 5.48 ~ 6.06 5.70 ~ 6.30 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 12 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report The following table gives the recipes for tissue simulating liquids. Tissue Type H750 H835 H900 H1450 H1640 H1750 H1800 H1900 H2000 H2300 H2450 H2600 H3500 H5G B750 B835 B900 B1450 B1640 B1750 B1800 B1900 B2000 B2300 B2450 B2600 B3500 B5G Table-3.2 Recipes of Tissue Simulating Liquid Bactericide DGBE HEC NaCl Sucrose Triton X-100 Water Diethylene Glycol Mono-

hexylether 0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43.3 45.8 47.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.9 45.0 45.1 8.0

-

-

-

-

34.0 32.5 31.0 29.5 29.5 30.0 31.0 31.4 31.8 28.8

-

1.5 1.5 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2

-

0.8 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

-

56.0 57.0 58.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

48.8 48.5 48.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20.0 17.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 42.1 41.1 40.2 56.1 53.7 52.6 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.0 54.9 54.8 71.8 65.5 50.0 50.2 50.5 65.7 67.2 68.8 70.1 70.2 69.8 68.9 68.5 68.1 71.1 78.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 13 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.3 SAR System Verification The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is performed daily or before every SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurements in the flat section of the phantom with a matched dipole at a specified distance. The system verification setup is shown as below. Fig-3.3 System Verification Setup The validation dipole is placed beneath the flat phantom with the specific spacer in place. The distance spacer is touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking and be oriented parallel to the long side of the phantom. The spectrum analyzer measures the forward power at the location of the system check dipole connector. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power (250 mW is used for 700 MHz to 3 GHz, 100 mW is used for 3.5 GHz to 6 GHz) at the dipole connector and the power meter is read at that level. After connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter. After system check testing, the SAR result will be normalized to 1W forward input power and compared with the reference SAR value derived from validation dipole certificate report. The deviation of system check should be within 10 %. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 14 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure According to the SAR test standard, the recommended procedure for assessing the peak spatia l-average SAR value consists of the following steps:

(a) Power reference measurement

(b) Area scan

(c) Zoom scan

(d) Power drift measurement The SAR measurement procedures for each of test conditions are as follows:

(a) Make EUT to transmit maximum output power

(b) Measure conducted output power through RF cable

(c) Place the EUT in the specific position of phantom

(d) Perform SAR testing steps on the DASY system

(e) Record the SAR value 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure First Area Scan is used to locate the approximate location(s) of the loc al peak SAR value(s). The measurement grid within an Area Scan is defined by the grid extent, grid step size and grid offset. Next, in order to determine the EM field distribution in a three-dimensional spatial extension, Zoom Scan is required. The Zoom Sc an is performed around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 10 g. According to KDB 865664 D01, the resolution for Area and Zoom scan is specified in the table below. Items Area Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(z) Zoom Scan Volume Note:

<= 2 GHz 2-3 GHz 3-4 GHz 4-5 GHz 5-6 GHz

<= 15 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 8 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 3 mm

<= 2 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 28 mm

>= 25 mm

>= 22 mm When zoom scan is required and report SAR is <= 1.4 W/kg, the zoom scan resolution of x / y (2-3GHz: <= 8 mm, 3-4GHz: <= 7 mm, 4-6GHz: <= 5 mm) may be applied. 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure The volume scan is used for assess overlapping SAR distributions for antennas transmitting in different frequency bands. It is equivalent to an oversized zoom scan used in standalone measurements. The measurement volume will be used to enclose all the simultaneous transmitting antennas. For antennas transmitting simultaneously in different frequency bands, the volume scan is measured separately in each frequency band. In order to sum correctly to compute the 1g aggregate SAR, the EUT remain in the same test position for all measurements and all volume scan use the same spatial resolution and grid spacing. When all volume scan were completed, the software, SEMCAD postprocessor can combine and subsequently superpose these measurement data to calculating the mu ltiband SAR. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 15 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring All SAR testing is under the EUT install full charged battery and transmit maximum output power. In DASY measurement software, the power reference measurement and power drift measurement procedures are used for monitoring the power drift of EUT during SAR test. Both these procedures measure the field at a specified reference position before and after the SAR testing. The software will calculate the field difference in dB. If the power drift more than 5%, the SAR will be retested. 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the test standard. It can be conducted for 1g and 10g, as well as for user-specific masses. The DASY software includes all numerical procedures necessary to evaluate the spatial peak SAR value. The base for the evaluation is a "cube" measurement. The measured volume must include the 1g and 10g cubes with the highest averaged SAR values. For that purpose, the center of the measured volume is aligned to the interpolated peak SAR value of a previously performed area scan. The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The system always gives the maximum values for the 1g and 10g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest averaged SAR is divided into the following stages:

(a) Extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan

(b) Calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and measurement parameters)

(c) Generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume

(d) Interpolation of all measured values form the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid

(e) Extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface

(f) Calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods In DASY, the interpolation and extrapolation are both based on the modified Quadratic Shepards method. The interpolation scheme combines a least-square fitted function method and a weighted average method which are the two basic types of computational interpolation and approximation. Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and 10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5 mm. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 16 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation 4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting

<Considerations Related to WLAN for Setup and Testing>

In general, various vendor specific external test software and chipset based internal test modes are typically used for SAR measurement. These chipset based test mode utilities are generally hardware and manufacturer dependent, and often include substantial flexibility to reconfigure or reprogram a device. A Wi-Fi device must be configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools for SAR measurement. The test frequencies established using test mode must correspond to the actual channel frequencies. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. In addition, a periodic transmission duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR correctly. The reported SAR must be scaled to 100%

transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. According to KDB 248227 D01, this device has installed WLAN engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During WLAN SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. Initial Test Configuration An initial test configuration is determined for OFDM transmission modes in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands according to the channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate combination(s) with the highest maximum output power specified for production units in each standalone and aggregated frequency band. When the same maximum power is specified for multiple transmission modes in a frequency band, the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order 802.11a/g/n/ac mode is used for SAR measurement, on the highest measured output power channel in the initial test configuration, for each frequency band. Subsequent Test Configuration SAR measurement requirements for the remaining 802.11 transmission mode conf igurations that have not been tested in the initial test configuration are determined separately for each standalone and aggregated frequency band, in each exposure condition, according to the maximum output power specified for production units. Additional power measurements may be required to determine if SAR measurements are required for subsequent highest output power channels in a subsequent test configuration. When the highest reported SAR for the initial test configuration according to the initial test position or fixed exposure position requirements, is adjusted by the ratio of the subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration specified maximum output power and the adjusted SAR is 1.2 W/kg, SAR is not required for that subsequent test configuration. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 17 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report SAR Test Configuration and Channel Selection When multiple channel bandwidth configurations in a frequency band have the same specified maximum output power, the initial test configuration is using largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate, and lowest order 802.11 mode (i.e., 802.11a is chosen over 802.11n then 802.11ac or 802.11g is chosen over 802.11n). After an initial test configuration is determined, if multiple test channels have the same measured maximum output power, the channel chosen for SAR measurement is determined according to the following. 1) The channel closest to mid-band frequency is selected for SAR measurement. 2) For channels with equal separation from mid-band frequency; for example, high and low channels or two mid-band channels, the higher frequency (number) channel is selected for SAR measurement.

<Considerations Related to Bluetooth for Setup and Testing>

This device has installed Bluetooth engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During Bluetooth SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. 4.2 EUT Testing Position 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires 1-g SAR, and the wrist-worn condition requires 10-g extremity SAR. The 10-g extremity and 1-g SAR test exclusions may be applied to the wrist and face exposure conditions. When SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. SAR for wrist exposure is evaluated with the back of the devices positioned in direct contact against a flat phantom fill with body tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be unstrapped and touching the phantom. The space introduced by the watch or wrist bands and the phantom must be representative of actual use conditions. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 18 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires face SAR. When face SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 10 mm Fig-4.1 Illustration for Smart Watch Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 19 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.3 Tissue Verification The measuring results for tissue simulating liquid are shown as below. Test Date May 17, 2018 May 17, 2018 Note:

Tissue Type Head Body Frequency

(MHz) 2450 2450 Liquid Temp.

() 23.3 23.5 Measured Conductivity Measured Permittivity Target Target Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Deviation Deviation

() 1.88 2.024

(r) 38.38 50.619

() 1.8 1.95

(r) 39.2 52.7

(%) 4.44 3.79

(%)

-2.09

-3.95 The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquid must be measured within 24 hours before the SAR testing and within 5% of the target values. Liquid temperature during the SAR testing must be within 2 . 4.4 System Validation The SAR measurement system was validated according to procedures in KDB 865664 D01. The validation status in tabulated summary is as below. Test Date May 17, 2018 May 17, 2018 Probe S/N 3971 3971 Measured Measured Validation for CW Validation for Modulation Calibration Point Conductiv ity Permittiv ity Sensitivity Probe Probe Modulation Head Body 2450 2450

() 1.88 2.024

(r) 38.38 50.619 Range Linearity Isotropy Type Duty Factor PAR Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass OFDM OFDM N/A N/A Pass Pass 4.5 System Verification The measuring result for system verification is tabulated as below. Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) SAR-1g

(W/kg) May 17, 2018 Head 2450 50.80 13.4 Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target SAR-10g Measured SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) May 17, 2018 Body 2450 23.40 5.45 Note:

Deviation

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N 5.51 737 3971 1431 Normalized to 1W SAR-1g

(W/kg) 53.60 Normalized to 1W Deviation SAR-10g

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N

(W/kg) 21.80

-6.84 737 3971 1431 Comparing to the reference SAR value provided by SPEAG, the validation data should be within its specification of 10 %. The result indicates the system check can meet the variation criterion and the plots can be referred to Appendix A of this report. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 20 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.6 Maximum Output Power 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power The maximum conducted average power (Unit: dBm) including tune-up tolerance is shown as below. Mode 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n HT20 Mode Bluetooth DH Bluetooth LE 2.4G WLAN 16.0 11.0 11.0 2.4G Bluetooth 13.0 4.0 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result The measuring conducted average power (Unit: dBm) is shown as below.

<WLAN 2.4G>

Mode 802.11b

<Bluetooth>

Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power 1 6 11 2412 2437 2462 15.24 15.47 15.26 Mode Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power Bluetooth BDR/GFSK Bluetooth EDR/DPSK Bluetooth 2EDR/8DPSK Bluetooth LE 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 19 39 2402 2441 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 11.84 11.86 11.82 9.51 9.50 9.48 9.60 9.53 9.50 3.15 2.98 3.03 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 21 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7 SAR Testing Results 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations

<KDB 447498 D01, General RF Exposure Guidance>

Testing of other required channels within the operating mode of a frequency band is not required when the reported SAR for the mid-band or highest output power channel is:

(1) 0.8 W/kg or 2.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 100 MHz

(2) 0.6 W/kg or 1.5 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is between 100 MHz and 200 MHz

(3) 0.4 W/kg or 1.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 200 MHz

<KDB 248227 D01, SAR Guidance for Wi-Fi Transmitters>

(1) For handsets operating next to ear, hotspot mode or mini-tablet configurations, the initial test position procedures were applied. The test position with the highest extrapolated peak SAR will be used as the initial test position. When the reported SAR of initial test position is <= 0.4 W/kg, SAR testing for remaining test positions is not required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the subsequent highest peak SAR positions until the reported SAR result is <= 0.8 W/kg or all test positions are measured.

(2) For WLAN 2.4 GHz, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. When the reported SAR is <= 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel. For OFDM modes (802.11g/n), SAR is not required when the highest reported SAR for DSSS is adjusted by the ratio of OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2 W/kg. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 22 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor 01 WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Front Face 6 1 11 97.50 97.50 97.50 1.03 1.03 1.03 Plot No. 02 Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor BT BT BT BDR BDR BDR Front Face Front Face Front Face 39 0 78 76.50 76.50 76.50 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.47 15.24 15.26 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 11.86 11.84 11.82 Scaling Factor 1.13 1.19 1.19 Scaling Factor 1.30 1.31 1.31 Power Drift

(dB) 0.02

-0.08 0.06 Power Drift

(dB) 0.03 0.01 0.07 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.03 0.03 0.03 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.00978 0.010 0.00908 0.02 0.02 0.02 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor 03 WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 6 1 11 97.50 97.50 97.50 1.03 1.03 1.03 Plot No. 04 Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor BT BT BT BDR BDR BDR Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face 39 0 78 76.50 76.50 76.50 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.47 15.24 15.26 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 11.86 11.84 11.82 Scaling Factor 1.13 1.19 1.19 Scaling Factor 1.30 1.31 1.31 Power Drift

(dB) 0.03 0.05

-0.03 Power Drift

(dB)

-0.09

-0.01 0.02 Measured SAR-10g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg) 0.116 0.098 0.109 0.14 0.12 0.13 Measured SAR-10g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg) 0.037 0.038 0.035 0.06 0.07 0.06 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 23 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability According to KDB 865664 D01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency band, which is determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media are required for SAR measurements in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures should be applied to the tissue medium with the highest measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. Alternatively, if the highest measured SAR for both head and body tissue-equivalent media are 1.45 W/kg and the ratio of these highest SAR values, i.e., largest divided by smallest value, is 1.10, the highest SAR configuration for either head or body tissue-equivalent medium may be used to perform the repeated measurement. These additional measurements are repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device should be returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it is re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated results. Since all the measured SAR are less than 0.8 W/kg, the repeated measurement is not required. 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation There is no simultaneous transmission configuration in this device. Test EngineerWilly Chang Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 24 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 5. Calibration of Test Equipment Equipment Manufacturer Model System Validation Dipole Dosimetric E-Field Probe Data Acquisition Electronics Spectrum Analyzer ENA Series Network Analyzer MXG Analong Signal Generator Vector Signal Generator Power Meter Power Sensor Thermometer Dielectric Assessment Kit SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG R&S Agilent Agilent Anritsu Anritsu Anritsu YFE SPEAG D2450V2 EX3DV4 DAE4 FSL6 E5071C N5181A MG3710A ML2495A MA2411B YF-160A DAK-3.5 SN 737 3971 1431 102006 MY46214281 MY50143868 6201599977 1218009 1207252 130504591 1047 Cal. Date Cal. Interval Aug. 17, 2017 Mar. 26, 2018 Mar. 16, 2018 Mar. 23, 2018 Jun. 09, 2017 Jul. 10, 2017 Mar. 16, 2018 Jul. 12, 2017 Jul. 12, 2017 Mar. 23, 2018 Aug. 15, 2017 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 25 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Taiwan HwaYa EMC/RF/Safety Lab:

Add: No.19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd., Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-318-3232 Fax: 886-3-327-0892 Taiwan LinKo EMC/RF Lab:

Add: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-2-2605-2180 Fax: 886-2-2605-1924 Taiwan HsinChu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab:

Add: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-666-8565 Fax: 886-3-666-8323 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

---END---

Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Page No.

: 26 of 26 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification The plots for system verification with largest deviation for each SAR system combination are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 System Check_H2450_180517 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 1.88 S/m; r = 38.38; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1654; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 22.5 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 105.5 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 27.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 13.4 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 6.2 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 22.5 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 System Check_B2450_180517 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 2.024 S/m; r = 50.619; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.5 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40CD;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 17.6 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 94.61 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 23.2 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 11.7 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.45 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 17.6 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement The SAR plots for highest measured SAR in each exposure configuration, wireless mode and frequency band combination, and measured SAR > 1.5 W/kg are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 P01 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch6 DUT: 180420C29 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 1.866 S/m; r = 38.442; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1654; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0536 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.619 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0480 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.027 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.015 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0388 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 P02 BT_BR-EDR_Front Face_10mm_Ch0 DUT: 180420C29 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.833 S/m; r = 38.602; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1654; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0126 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 2.650 V/m; Power Drift = 0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0270 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.010 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.00525 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0153 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 P03 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch6 DUT: 180420C29 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 2.008 S/m; r = 50.639; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.5 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40CD;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.357 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 10.87 V/m; Power Drift = 0.03 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.778 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.308 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.116 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.453 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 P04 BT_BR-EDR_Rear Face_0mm_Ch0 DUT: 180420C29 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.969 S/m; r = 50.793; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.5 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40CD;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0993 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 5.787 V/m; Power Drift = -0.01 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.344 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.117 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.038 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.254 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole The SPEAG calibration certificates are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report FCC SAR Test Report Report No.

: SA180420C33 Applicant

: Fossil Group, Inc. Address Product FCC ID Model No. Standards

: 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

: Smart Watch

: UK7-DW6A

: DW6D1

: FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093), IEEE C95.1:1992, IEEE Std 1528:2013 KDB 865664 D01 v01r04, KDB 865664 D02 v01r02

, KDB 248227 D01 v02r02, KDB 447498 D01 v06 Sample Received Date

: Apr. 20, 2018 Date of Testing

: May 17, 2018 ~ Jun. 15, 2018 Lab Address

: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Test Location

: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil, Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan (R.O.C) CERTIFICATION: The above equipment have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lin Kou Laboratories, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples SAR characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agenc ies. Prepared By :

Approved By :

Rona Chen / Specialist Eli Hsu / Senior Engineer FCC Accredited No.: TW0003 This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified her ein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall s pecifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute yo ur unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unles s specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non -compliance to the specification. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 1 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table of Contents 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.1 3.2 Release Control Record ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Description of Equipment Under Test ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3. SAR Measurement Syste m ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) ..................................................................................................................... 6 SPEAG DASY52 System..................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Robot .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Probes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.4 Phantoms ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.5 Device Holder .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles....................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids........................................................................................................................................ 11 SAR System Verification .................................................................................................................................................... 14 SAR Measurement Procedure .......................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure ......................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation.................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 16 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Configuration and Setting.......................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Testing Position.......................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions............................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.3 Limbs Exposure Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 19 Tissue Verification .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 4.3 System Validation............................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4 4.5 System Verification ............................................................................................................................................................ 20 4.6 Maximum Output Power .................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power ....................................................................................................................... 21 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result....................................................................................................................... 21 SAR Testing Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm)............................................... 23 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) ......................................... 23 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability ................................................................................................................................. 24 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation ............................................................................................... 24 5. Calibration of Test Equipment ................................................................................................................................................... 25 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................................................................. 26 Appendix A. SAR Plots of Syste m Verification Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measure ment Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup 4.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 2 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Release Control Record Report No. Reason for Change SA180420C33 Initial releas e Date Issued Jun. 15, 2018 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 3 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value Equipment Class Mode DTS DSS DXX Note:

2.4G WLAN Bluetooth NFC Highest SAR-1g Face Tested at 10 mm

(W/kg) 0.06 0.04 N/A Highest SAR-10g Extremity Tested at 0 mm

(W/kg) 0.16 0.12 N/A 1. The SAR criteria (Head & Body: SAR-1g 1.6 W/kg, and Extremity: SAR-10g 4.0 W/kg) for general population /

uncontrolled exposure is specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2 (2.1093) and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 4 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 2. Description of Equipment Under Test EUT Type FCC ID Model Name Tx Frequency Bands

(Unit: MHz) Uplink Modulations Maximum Tune-up Conducted Power

(Unit: dBm) Antenna Type EUT Stage Note:

Smart Watch UK7-DW6A DW6D1 WLAN : 2412 ~ 2462 Bluetooth : 2402 ~ 2480 NFC : 13.56 802.11b : DSSS 802.11/g/n : OFDM Bluetooth : GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK NFC : ASK Please refer to section 4.6.1 of this report Loop Antenna

(Peak Antenna Gain : -7.76 dBi for 2.4GHz) Identical Prototype 1. The EUT accessory list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. 2. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description please refers to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 5 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3. SAR Measurement System 3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in an object exposed to a radio field. The SAR distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and general population/uncontrolled, based on a persons awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrolled. The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given density (). The equation description is as below:

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg) SAR measurement can be related to the electrical field in the tissue by Where: is the conductivity of the tissue, is the mass density of the tissue and E is the RMS electrical field strength. 3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System DASY52 system consists of high precision robot, probe alignment sensor, phantom, robot controller, controlled measurement server and near-field probe. The robot includes six axes that can move to the precision position of the DASY52 software defined. The DASY52 software can define the area that is detected by the probe. The robot is connected to controlled box. Controlled measurement server is connected to the controlled robot box. The DAE includes amplifier, signal multiplexing, AD converter, offset measurement and surface detection. It is connected to the Electro-optical coupler (ECO). The ECO performs the conversion form the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the PC. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 6 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Fig-3.1 SPEAG DASY52 System Setup 3.2.1 Robot The DASY52 systems use the high precision robots from Stubli SA (France). For the 6-axis controller system, the robot controller version of CS8c from Stubli is used. The Stubli robot series have many features that are important for our application:

High precision (repeatability 0.035 mm) High reliability (industrial design) Jerk-free straight movements Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Fig-3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System Page No.

: 7 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.2 Probes The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe. The probe is specially designed and calibrated for use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid at different frequency. Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions EX3DV4 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 6 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.5 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 10 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 W/g) Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm) Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm ES3DV3 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Interleaved sensors. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 4 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.0 mm ET3DV6 Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection system. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE) 10 MHz to 2.3 GHz; Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.4 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g; Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 16 mm) Tip diameter: 6.8 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) Model Construction Measurement Range Input Offset Voltage Input Bias Current Dimensions DAE3, DAE4 Signal amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter and control logic. Serial optical link for communication with DASY embedded system (fully remote controlled). Two step probe touch detector for mechanical surface detection and emergency robot stop.

-100 to +300 mV (16 bit resolution and two range settings: 4mV, 400m V)

< 5 V (with auto zero)

< 50 fA 60 x 60 x 68 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 8 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.4 Phantoms Model Construction Material Shell Thickness Dimensions Filling Volume Model Construction Material Shell Thickness Dimensions Filling Volume Twin SAM The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by teaching three points with the robot. Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) 2 0.2 mm (6 0.2 mm at ear point) Length: 1000 mm Width: 500 mm Height: adjustable feet approx. 25 liters ELI Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup, including all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with all SPEAG dosimetric probes and dipoles. Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) 2.0 0.2 mm (bottom plate) Major axis: 600 mm Minor axis: 400 mm approx. 30 liters Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 9 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.5 Device Holder Model Construction Material Model Construction Mounting Device In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom or ELI4, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter device in spherical coordinates. Rotation point is the ear opening point. Transmitter devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked for positioning at different phantom sections (left head, right head, flat). POM Laptop Extensions Kit Simple but effective and easy-to-use extension for Mounting Device that facilitates the testing of larger devices according to IEC 62209-2 (e.g., laptops, cameras, etc.). It is lightweight and fits easily on the upper part of the Mounting Device in place of the phone positioner. Material POM, Acrylic glass, Foam 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles Model Construction Frequency Return Loss D-Serial Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun. Enables measurement of feed point impedance with NWA. Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with tissue simulating solutions. 750 MHz to 5800 MHz

> 20 dB Power Capability

> 100 W (f < 1GHz), > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 10 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with homogeneous tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15 cm. For head SAR testing, the liquid height from the ear reference point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. For body SAR testing, the liquid height from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. The nominal dielectric values of the tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 5% are listed in Table-3.1. Photo of Liquid Height for Head Position Photo of Liquid Height for Body Position The dielectric properties of the head tissue simulating liquids are defined in IEEE 1528, and KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. For the body tissue simulating liquids, the dielectric properties are defined in KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using a dielectric assessment kit and a network analyzer. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 11 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table-3.1 Targets of Tissue Simulating Liquid Frequency

(MHz) Target Permittivity 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 41.9 41.5 41.5 40.5 40.3 40.1 40.0 40.0 40.0 39.5 39.2 39.0 37.9 36.0 35.9 35.6 35.5 35.3 55.5 55.2 55.0 54.0 53.8 53.4 53.3 53.3 53.3 52.9 52.7 52.5 51.3 49.0 48.9 48.6 48.5 48.2 Range of 5%

For Head 39.8 ~ 44.0 39.4 ~ 43.6 39.4 ~ 43.6 38.5 ~ 42.5 38.3 ~ 42.3 38.1 ~ 42.1 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 37.5 ~ 41.5 37.2 ~ 41.2 37.1 ~ 41.0 36.0 ~ 39.8 34.2 ~ 37.8 34.1 ~ 37.7 33.8 ~ 37.4 33.7 ~ 37.3 33.5 ~ 37.1 For Body 52.7 ~ 58.3 52.4 ~ 58.0 52.3 ~ 57.8 51.3 ~ 56.7 51.1 ~ 56.5 50.7 ~ 56.1 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.3 ~ 55.5 50.1 ~ 55.3 49.9 ~ 55.1 48.7 ~ 53.9 46.6 ~ 51.5 46.5 ~ 51.3 46.2 ~ 51.0 46.1 ~ 50.9 45.8 ~ 50.6 Target Conductivity 0.89 0.90 0.97 1.20 1.29 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.67 1.80 1.96 2.91 4.66 4.76 4.96 5.07 5.27 0.96 0.97 1.05 1.30 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.81 1.95 2.16 3.31 5.30 5.42 5.65 5.77 6.00 Range of 5%

0.85 ~ 0.93 0.86 ~ 0.95 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.14 ~ 1.26 1.23 ~ 1.35 1.30 ~ 1.44 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.59 ~ 1.75 1.71 ~ 1.89 1.86 ~ 2.06 2.76 ~ 3.06 4.43 ~ 4.89 4.52 ~ 5.00 4.71 ~ 5.21 4.82 ~ 5.32 5.01 ~ 5.53 0.91 ~ 1.01 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.00 ~ 1.10 1.24 ~ 1.37 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.42 ~ 1.56 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.72 ~ 1.90 1.85 ~ 2.05 2.05 ~ 2.27 3.14 ~ 3.48 5.04 ~ 5.57 5.15 ~ 5.69 5.37 ~ 5.93 5.48 ~ 6.06 5.70 ~ 6.30 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 12 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report The following table gives the recipes for tissue simulating liquids. Tissue Type H750 H835 H900 H1450 H1640 H1750 H1800 H1900 H2000 H2300 H2450 H2600 H3500 H5G B750 B835 B900 B1450 B1640 B1750 B1800 B1900 B2000 B2300 B2450 B2600 B3500 B5G Table-3.2 Recipes of Tissue Simulating Liquid Bactericide DGBE HEC NaCl Sucrose Triton X-100 Water Diethylene Glycol Mono-

hexylether 0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43.3 45.8 47.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.9 45.0 45.1 8.0

-

-

-

-

34.0 32.5 31.0 29.5 29.5 30.0 31.0 31.4 31.8 28.8

-

1.5 1.5 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2

-

0.8 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

-

56.0 57.0 58.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

48.8 48.5 48.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20.0 17.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 42.1 41.1 40.2 56.1 53.7 52.6 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.0 54.9 54.8 71.8 65.5 50.0 50.2 50.5 65.7 67.2 68.8 70.1 70.2 69.8 68.9 68.5 68.1 71.1 78.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 13 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.3 SAR System Verification The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is performed daily or before every SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurements in the flat section of the phantom with a matched dipole at a specified distance. The system verification setup is shown as below. Fig-3.3 System Verification Setup The validation dipole is placed beneath the flat phantom with the specific spacer in place. The distance spacer is touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking and be oriented parallel to the long side of the phantom. The spectrum analyzer measures the forward power at the location of the system check dipole connector. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power (250 mW is used for 700 MHz to 3 GHz, 100 mW is used for 3.5 GHz to 6 GHz) at the dipole connector and the power meter is read at that level. After connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter. After system check testing, the SAR result will be normalized to 1W forward input power and compared with the reference SAR value derived from validation dipole certificate report. The deviation of system check should be within 10 %. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 14 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure According to the SAR test standard, the recommended procedure for assessing the peak spatia l-average SAR value consists of the following steps:

(a) Power reference measurement

(b) Area scan

(c) Zoom scan

(d) Power drift measurement The SAR measurement procedures for each of test conditions are as follows:

(a) Make EUT to transmit maximum output power

(b) Measure conducted output power through RF cable

(c) Place the EUT in the specific position of phantom

(d) Perform SAR testing steps on the DASY system

(e) Record the SAR value 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure First Area Scan is used to locate the approximate location(s) of the loc al peak SAR value(s). The measurement grid within an Area Scan is defined by the grid extent, grid step size and grid offset. Next, in order to determine the EM field distribution in a three-dimensional spatial extension, Zoom Scan is required. The Zoom Sc an is performed around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 10 g. According to KDB 865664 D01, the resolution for Area and Zoom scan is specified in the table below. Items Area Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(z) Zoom Scan Volume Note:

<= 2 GHz 2-3 GHz 3-4 GHz 4-5 GHz 5-6 GHz

<= 15 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 8 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 3 mm

<= 2 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 28 mm

>= 25 mm

>= 22 mm When zoom scan is required and report SAR is <= 1.4 W/kg, the zoom scan resolution of x / y (2-3GHz: <= 8 mm, 3-4GHz: <= 7 mm, 4-6GHz: <= 5 mm) may be applied. 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure The volume scan is used for assess overlapping SAR distributions for antennas transmitting in different frequency bands. It is equivalent to an oversized zoom scan used in standalone measurements. The measurement volume will be used to enclose all the simultaneous transmitting antennas. For antennas transmitting simultaneously in different frequency bands, the volume scan is measured separately in each frequency band. In order to sum correctly to compute the 1g aggregate SAR, the EUT remain in the same test position for all measurements and all volume scan use the same spatial resolution and grid spacing. When all volume scan were completed, the software, SEMCAD postprocessor can combine and subsequently superpose these measurement data to calculating the mu ltiband SAR. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 15 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring All SAR testing is under the EUT install full charged battery and transmit maximum output power. In DASY measurement software, the power reference measurement and power drift measurement procedures are used for monitoring the power drift of EUT during SAR test. Both these procedures measure the field at a specified reference position before and after the SAR testing. The software will calculate the field difference in dB. If the power drift more than 5%, the SAR will be retested. 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the test standard. It can be conducted for 1g and 10g, as well as for user-specific masses. The DASY software includes all numerical procedures necessary to evaluate the spatial peak SAR value. The base for the evaluation is a "cube" measurement. The measured volume must include the 1g and 10g cubes with the highest averaged SAR values. For that purpose, the center of the measured volume is aligned to the interpolated peak SAR value of a previously performed area scan. The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The system always gives the maximum values for the 1g and 10g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest averaged SAR is divided into the following stages:

(a) Extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan

(b) Calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and measurement parameters)

(c) Generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume

(d) Interpolation of all measured values form the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid

(e) Extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface

(f) Calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods In DASY, the interpolation and extrapolation are both based on the modified Quadratic Shepards method. The interpolation scheme combines a least-square fitted function method and a weighted average method which are the two basic types of computational interpolation and approximation. Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and 10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5 mm. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 16 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation 4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting

<Considerations Related to WLAN for Setup and Testing>

In general, various vendor specific external test software and chipset based internal test modes are typically used for SAR measurement. These chipset based test mode utilities are generally hardware and manufacturer dependent, and often include substantial flexibility to reconfigure or reprogram a device. A Wi-Fi device must be configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools for SAR measurement. The test frequencies established using test mode must correspond to the actual channel frequencies. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. In addition, a periodic transmission duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR correctly. The reported SAR must be scaled to 100%

transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. According to KDB 248227 D01, this device has installed WLAN engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During WLAN SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. Initial Test Configuration An initial test configuration is determined for OFDM transmission modes in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands according to the channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate combination(s) with the highest maximum output power specified for production units in each standalone and aggregated frequency band. When the same maximum power is specified for multiple transmission modes in a frequency band, the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order 802.11a/g/n/ac mode is used for SAR measurement, on the highest measured output power channel in the initial test configuration, for each frequency band. Subsequent Test Configuration SAR measurement requirements for the remaining 802.11 transmission mode conf igurations that have not been tested in the initial test configuration are determined separately for each standalone and aggregated frequency band, in each exposure condition, according to the maximum output power specified for production units. Additional power measurements may be required to determine if SAR measurements are required for subsequent highest output power channels in a subsequent test configuration. When the highest reported SAR for the initial test configuration according to the initial test position or fixed exposure position requirements, is adjusted by the ratio of the subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration specified maximum output power and the adjusted SAR is 1.2 W/kg, SAR is not required for that subsequent test configuration. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 17 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report SAR Test Configuration and Channel Selection When multiple channel bandwidth configurations in a frequency band have the same specified maximum output power, the initial test configuration is using largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate, and lowest order 802.11 mode (i.e., 802.11a is chosen over 802.11n then 802.11ac or 802.11g is chosen over 802.11n). After an initial test configuration is determined, if multiple test channels have the same measured maximum output power, the channel chosen for SAR measurement is determined according to the following. 1) The channel closest to mid-band frequency is selected for SAR measurement. 2) For channels with equal separation from mid-band frequency; for example, high and low channels or two mid-band channels, the higher frequency (number) channel is selected for SAR measurement.

<Considerations Related to Bluetooth for Setup and Testing>

This device has installed Bluetooth engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During Bluetooth SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. 4.2 EUT Testing Position 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires 1-g SAR, and the wrist-worn condition requires 10-g extremity SAR. The 10-g extremity and 1-g SAR test exclusions may be applied to the wrist and face exposure conditions. When SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. SAR for wrist exposure is evaluated with the back of the devices positioned in direct contact against a flat phantom fill with body tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be unstrapped and touching the phantom. The space introduced by the watch or wrist bands and the phantom must be representative of actual use conditions. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 18 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires face SAR. When face SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 10 mm Fig-4.1 Illustration for Smart Watch 4.2.3 Limbs Exposure Conditions For wireless watch whose intended use includes being strapped to the arm or leg of the user while transmitting

(except in idle mode), the strap shall be opened so that it is divided into two parts as shown in below. The device shall be positioned directly against the phantom surface with the strap straightened as much as possible and the back of the device towards the phantom. If the strap cannot normally be opened to allow placing in direct contact with the phantom surface, it may be necessary to break the strap of the device but ensuring to not damage the antenna. Fig-4.2 Illustration for Wireless Watch Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 19 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.3 Tissue Verification The measuring results for tissue simulating liquid are shown as below. Test Date May 17, 2018 May 17, 2018 Jun. 15, 2018 Note:

Tissue Type Head Body Body Frequency

(MHz) 2450 2450 2450 Liquid Temp.

() 23.3 23.5 23.4 Measured Conductivity Measured Permittivity Target Target Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Deviation Deviation

() 1.88 2.024 2.044

(r) 38.38 50.619 53.606

() 1.8 1.95 1.95

(r) 39.2 52.7 52.7

(%) 4.44 3.79 4.82

(%)

-2.09

-3.95 1.72 The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquid must be measured within 24 hours before the SAR testing and within 5% of the target values. Liquid temperature during the SAR testing must be within 2 . 4.4 System Validation The SAR measurement system was validated according to procedures in KDB 865664 D01. The validation status in tabulated summary is as below. Test Date May 17, 2018 May 17, 2018 Jun. 15, 2018 Probe S/N 3971 3971 3971 Measured Measured Validation for CW Validation for Modulation Calibration Point Conductiv ity Permittiv ity Sensitivity Probe Probe Modulation Head Body Body 2450 2450 2450

() 1.88 2.024 2.044

(r) 38.38 50.619 53.606 Range Linearity Isotropy Type Duty Factor PAR Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass OFDM OFDM OFDM N/A N/A N/A Pass Pass Pass 4.5 System Verification The measuring result for system verification is tabulated as below. Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) SAR-1g

(W/kg) May 17, 2018 Head 2450 50.80 13.4 Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-10g SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) May 17, 2018 Jun. 15, 2018 Body Body 2450 2450 23.40 23.40 5.45 5.91 Note:

Normalized to 1W SAR-1g

(W/kg) 53.60 Normalized to 1W SAR-10g

(W/kg) 21.80 23.64 Deviation

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N 5.51 737 3971 1431 Deviation

(%) Dipole S/N

-6.84 1.03 737 737 Probe S/N 3971 3971 DAE S/N 1431 1431 Comparing to the reference SAR value provided by SPEAG, the validation data should be within its specification of 10 %. The result indicates the system check can meet the variation criterion and the plots can be referred to Appendix A of this report. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 20 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.6 Maximum Output Power 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power The maximum conducted average power (Unit: dBm) including tune-up tolerance is shown as below. Mode 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n HT20 Mode Bluetooth DH Bluetooth LE 2.4G WLAN 16.0 11.0 11.0 2.4G Bluetooth 13.0 4.0 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result The measuring conducted average power (Unit: dBm) is shown as below.

<WLAN 2.4G>

Mode 802.11b

<Bluetooth>

Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power 1 6 11 2412 2437 2462 15.24 15.47 15.26 Mode Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power Bluetooth BDR/GFSK Bluetooth EDR/DPSK Bluetooth 2EDR/8DPSK Bluetooth LE 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 19 39 2402 2441 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 11.84 11.86 11.82 9.51 9.50 9.48 9.60 9.53 9.50 3.15 2.98 3.03 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 21 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7 SAR Testing Results 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations

<KDB 447498 D01, General RF Exposure Guidance>

Testing of other required channels within the operating mode of a frequency band is not required when the reported SAR for the mid-band or highest output power channel is:

(1) 0.8 W/kg or 2.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 100 MHz

(2) 0.6 W/kg or 1.5 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is between 100 MHz and 200 MHz

(3) 0.4 W/kg or 1.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 200 MHz

<KDB 248227 D01, SAR Guidance for Wi-Fi Transmitters>

(1) For handsets operating next to ear, hotspot mode or mini-tablet configurations, the initial test position procedures were applied. The test position with the highest extrapolated peak SAR will be used as the initial test position. When the reported SAR of initial test position is <= 0.4 W/kg, SAR testing for remaining test positions is not required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the subsequent highest peak SAR positions until the reported SAR result is <= 0.8 W/kg or all test positions are measured.

(2) For WLAN 2.4 GHz, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. When the reported SAR is <= 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel. For OFDM modes (802.11g/n), SAR is not required when the highest reported SAR for DSSS is adjusted by the ratio of OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2 W/kg. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 22 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 Plot No. 02 Plot No. FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor 01 WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Front Face 6 1 11 97.50 97.50 97.50 1.03 1.03 1.03 Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle Crest Factor BT BT BT BDR BDR BDR Front Face Front Face Front Face 39 0 78 76.50 76.50 76.50 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.47 15.24 15.26 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 11.86 11.84 11.82 Scaling Factor 1.13 1.19 1.19 Scaling Factor 1.30 1.31 1.31 Power Drift

(dB) 0.06

-0.03 0.01 Power Drift

(dB) 0.03

-0.07

-0.05 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.052 0.048 0.045 0.06 0.06 0.06 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.019 0.021 0.018 0.03 0.04 0.03 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) Band Mode Test Position Ch. Phantom Duty Cycle WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 03 WLAN 2.4G 802.11b Rear Face 6 1 11 6 Flat Flat Flat Neck 97.50 97.50 97.50 97.50 Plot No. 04 Band Mode Test Position Ch. Phantom Duty Cycle BT BT BT BT BDR BDR BDR BDR Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face 39 0 78 0 Flat Flat Flat Neck 76.50 76.50 76.50 76.50 Crest Factor 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Crest Factor 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.47 15.24 15.26 15.47 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 11.86 11.84 11.82 11.84 Scaling Factor 1.13 1.19 1.19 1.13 Scaling Factor 1.30 1.31 1.31 1.31 Power Drift

(dB)

-0.01 0.06

-0.02 0.03 Power Drift

(dB)

-0.09

-0.03 0.05

-0.09 Measured SAR-10g Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) 0.066 0.057 0.051 0.138 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.16 Measured SAR-10g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg) 0.045 0.051 0.047 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.12 Note: There has separation distance between Smart watch and Flat-phantom when tests on rear face. Therefore, we add additional test with neck portion to verify the worst case which has been evaluated. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 23 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability According to KDB 865664 D01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency band, which is determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media are required for SAR measurements in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures should be applied to the tissue medium with the highest measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. Alternatively, if the highest measured SAR for both head and body tissue-equivalent media are 1.45 W/kg and the ratio of these highest SAR values, i.e., largest divided by smallest value, is 1.10, the highest SAR configuration for either head or body tissue-equivalent medium may be used to perform the repeated measurement. These additional measurements are repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device should be returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it is re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated results. Since all the measured SAR are less than 0.8 W/kg, the repeated measurement is not required. 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation There is no simultaneous transmission configuration in this device. Test EngineerWilly Chang Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 24 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 5. Calibration of Test Equipment Equipment Manufacturer Model System Validation Dipole Dosimetric E-Field Probe Data Acquisition Electronics Spectrum Analyzer ENA Series Network Analyzer ENA Series Network Analyzer MXG Analong Signal Generator Vector Signal Generator Power Meter Power Sensor Thermometer Dielectric Assessment Kit SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG R&S Agilent Agilent Agilent Anritsu Anritsu Anritsu YFE SPEAG D2450V2 EX3DV4 DAE4 FSL6 E5071C E5071C N5181A MG3710A ML2495A MA2411B YF-160A DAK-3.5 SN 737 3971 1431 102006 MY46214281 MY46104190 MY50143868 6201599977 1218009 1207252 130504591 1047 Cal. Date Cal. Interval Aug. 17, 2017 Mar. 26, 2018 Mar. 16, 2018 Mar. 23, 2018 Jun. 09, 2017 Jan. 15, 2018 Jul. 10, 2017 Mar. 16, 2018 Jul. 12, 2017 Jul. 12, 2017 Mar. 23, 2018 Aug. 15, 2017 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 25 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Taiwan HwaYa EMC/RF/Safety Lab:

Add: No.19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd., Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-318-3232 Fax: 886-3-327-0892 Taiwan LinKo EMC/RF Lab:

Add: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-2-2605-2180 Fax: 886-2-2605-1924 Taiwan HsinChu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab:

Add: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-666-8565 Fax: 886-3-666-8323 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

---END---

Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Page No.

: 26 of 26 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification The plots for system verification with largest deviation for each SAR system combination are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 System Check_H2450_180517 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 1.88 S/m; r = 38.38; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1654; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 22.5 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 105.5 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 27.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 13.4 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 6.2 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 22.5 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 System Check_B2450_180517 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 2.024 S/m; r = 50.619; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.5 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40CD;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 17.6 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 94.61 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 23.2 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 11.7 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.45 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 17.6 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement The SAR plots for highest measured SAR in each exposure configuration, wireless mode and frequency band combination, and measured SAR > 1.5 W/kg are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 P01 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch6 DUT: 180420C33 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 1.866 S/m; r = 38.442; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1654; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.102 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 6.484 V/m; Power Drift = 0.06 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0930 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.052 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.027 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0756 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/05/17 P02 BT_BDR_Front Face_10mm_Ch0 DUT: 180420C33 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N1_0517 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.833 S/m; r = 38.602; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.77, 7.77, 7.77); Calibrated: 2018/03/26;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1654; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7437)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0387 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.183 V/m; Power Drift = -0.07 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0390 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.021 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.010 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0295 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/06/15 P03 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face-Neck_0mm_Ch6 DUT: 180420C33 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0615 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 2.029 S/m; r = 53.643; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40CD;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.341 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 13.51 V/m; Power Drift = -0.08 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.29 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.402 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.138 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.647 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab 2018/06/15 P04 BT_BDR_Rear Face-Neck_0mm_Ch0 DUT: 180420C33 Date: 2018/06/15, Date:

Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0615 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.99 S/m; r = 53.755; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3971; ConvF(7.7, 7.7, 7.7); Calibrated: 2018/03/26

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE4 Sn1431; Calibrated: 2018/03/16

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1822; Type: QD000P40CD;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (1); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.11 (7439)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.354 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 13.14 V/m; Power Drift = 0.17 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.368 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.172 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.070 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.323 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole The SPEAG calibration certificates are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 Issued Date

: Jun. 15, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole The SPEAG calibration certificates are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report FCC SAR Test Report Report No.

: SA180209C22 Applicant

: Fossil Group, Inc. Address Product FCC ID Model No. Standards

: 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

: Smart Watch

: UK7-DW6A

: DW6F1

: FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093), IEEE C95.1:1992, IEEE Std 1528:2013 KDB 865664 D01 v01r04, KDB 865664 D02 v01r02 KDB 248227 D01 v02r02, KDB 447498 D01 v06 Sample Received Date

: Feb. 09, 2018 Date of Testing

: Mar. 16, 2018 Lab Address

: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. Test Location

: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil, Kwei Shan Dist., Taoyuan City 33383, Taiwan (R.O.C) CERTIFICATION: The above equipment have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lin Kou Laboratories, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples SAR characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Prepared By :

Evonne Liu / Specialist Approved By :

Eli Hsu / Senior Engineer This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 1 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table of Contents 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.1 3.2 Release Control Record ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Description of Equipment Under Test ................................................................................................................................. 5 3. SAR Measurement System ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) ............................................................................................................... 6 SPEAG DASY52 System ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2.1 Robot.................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Probes ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) .................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.4 Phantoms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.5 Device Holder ................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids ................................................................................................................................. 11 SAR System Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 14 SAR Measurement Procedure ................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods ................................................................................................................................... 16 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 EUT Configuration and Setting ................................................................................................................................... 17 EUT Testing Position .................................................................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 19 Tissue Verification ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 System Validation ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4 4.5 System Verification ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.6 Maximum Output Power ............................................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power ................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result ................................................................................................................. 21 SAR Testing Results .................................................................................................................................................. 22 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations ................................................................................................................ 22 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) ............................................ 23 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) ....................................... 23 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation .......................................................................................... 23 5. Calibration of Test Equipment ............................................................................................................................................ 24 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories ........................................................................................................................... 25 Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement Appendix C. Calibration Certificate for Probe and Dipole Appendix D. Photographs of EUT and Setup 4.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 2 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Release Control Record Report No. Reason for Change SA180209C22 Initial release Date Issued May 30, 2018 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 3 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 1. Summary of Maximum SAR Value Equipment Class DTS DSS Note:

Mode 2.4G WLAN Bluetooth Highest SAR-1g Face Tested at 10 mm

(W/kg) 0.08 0.04 Highest SAR-10g Extremity Tested at 0 mm

(W/kg) 0.12 0.05 1. The SAR criteria (Head & Body: SAR-1g 1.6 W/kg, and Extremity: SAR-10g 4.0 W/kg) for general population /

uncontrolled exposure is specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2 (2.1093) and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 4 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 2. Description of Equipment Under Test EUT Type FCC ID Model Name Tx Frequency Bands

(Unit: MHz) Uplink Modulations Maximum Tune-up Conducted Power

(Unit: dBm) Antenna Type EUT Stage Note:

Smart Watch UK7-DW6A DW6F1 WLAN : 2412 ~ 2462 Bluetooth : 2402 ~ 2480 802.11b : DSSS 802.11g/n : OFDM Bluetooth : GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK Please refer to section 4.6.1 of this report Loop Antenna

(Peak Antenna Gain : -7.03 dBi for 2.4GHz) Identical Prototype 1. The EUT accessories list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. 2. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description please refers to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 5 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3. SAR Measurement System 3.1 Definition of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in an object exposed to a radio field. The SAR distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and general population/uncontrolled, based on a persons awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrolled. The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given density (). The equation description is as below:

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg) SAR measurement can be related to the electrical field in the tissue by Where: is the conductivity of the tissue, is the mass density of the tissue and E is the RMS electrical field strength. 3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System DASY52 system consists of high precision robot, probe alignment sensor, phantom, robot controller, controlled measurement server and near-field probe. The robot includes six axes that can move to the precision position of the DASY52 software defined. The DASY52 software can define the area that is detected by the probe. The robot is connected to controlled box. Controlled measurement server is connected to the controlled robot box. The DAE includes amplifier, signal multiplexing, AD converter, offset measurement and surface detection. It is connected to the Electro-optical coupler (ECO). The ECO performs the conversion form the optical into digital electric signal of the DAE and transfers data to the PC. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 6 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Fig-3.1 SPEAG DASY52 System Setup 3.2.1 Robot The DASY52 system uses the high precision robots from Stubli SA (France). For the 6-axis controller system, the robot controller version of CS8c from Stubli is used. The Stubli robot series have many features that are important for our application:

High precision (repeatability 0.035 mm) High reliability (industrial design) Jerk-free straight movements Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Fig-3.2 SPEAG DASY52 System Page No.

: 7 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.2 Probes The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe. The probe is specially designed and calibrated for use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid at different frequency. Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions Model Construction Frequency Directivity Dynamic Range Dimensions EX3DV4 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 6 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.5 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 10 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 W/g) Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm) Typical distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm ES3DV3 Symmetrical design with triangular core. Interleaved sensors. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE). 10 MHz to 4 GHz Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.0 mm ET3DV6 Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection system. Built-in shielding against static charges. PEEK enclosure material

(resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE) 10 MHz to 2.3 GHz; Linearity: 0.2 dB 0.2 dB in TSL (rotation around probe axis) 0.4 dB in TSL (rotation normal to probe axis) 5 W/g to 100 mW/g; Linearity: 0.2 dB Overall length: 337 mm (Tip: 16 mm) Tip diameter: 6.8 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 8 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.3 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) Model Construction Measurement Range Input Offset Voltage Input Bias Current Dimensions 3.2.4 Phantoms DAE3, DAE4 Signal amplifier, multiplexer, A/D converter and control logic. Serial optical link for communication with DASY embedded system (fully remote controlled). Two step probe touch detector for mechanical surface detection and emergency robot stop.

-100 to +300 mV (16 bit resolution and two range settings: 4mV, 400mV)

< 5V (with auto zero)

< 50 fA 60 x 60 x 68 mm Model Twin SAM Construction The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528 and IEC 62209-1. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by teaching three points with the robot. Material Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) Shell Thickness 2 0.2 mm (6 0.2 mm at ear point) Dimensions Length: 1000 mm Width: 500 mm Height: adjustable feet Filling Volume approx. 25 liters Model ELI Construction Phantom for compliance testing of handheld and body-mounted wireless devices in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI is fully compatible with the IEC 62209-2 standard and all known tissue simulating liquids. ELI has been optimized regarding its performance and can be integrated into our standard phantom tables. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow installation of the complete setup, including all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids, by teaching three points. The phantom is compatible with all SPEAG dosimetric probes and dipoles. Material Vinylester, glass fiber reinforced (VE-GF) Shell Thickness 2.0 0.2 mm (bottom plate) Dimensions Major axis: 600 mm Minor axis: 400 mm Filling Volume approx. 30 liters Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 9 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.5 Device Holder Model Construction Mounting Device In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom or ELI4, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter device in spherical coordinates. Rotation point is the ear opening point. Transmitter devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked for positioning at different phantom sections (left head, right head, flat). Material POM Model Construction Laptop Extensions Kit Simple but effective and easy-to-use extension for Mounting Device that facilitates the testing of larger devices according to IEC 62209-2 (e.g., laptops, cameras, etc.). It is lightweight and fits easily on the upper part of the Mounting Device in place of the phone positioner. Material POM, Acrylic glass, Foam 3.2.6 System Validation Dipoles Model Construction Frequency Return Loss D-Serial Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun. Enables measurement of feed point impedance with NWA. Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with tissue simulating solutions. 750 MHz to 5800 MHz

> 20 dB Power Capability

> 100 W (f < 1GHz), > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 10 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.2.7 Tissue Simulating Liquids For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with homogeneous tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15 cm. For head SAR testing, the liquid height from the ear reference point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. For body SAR testing, the liquid height from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15 cm. The nominal dielectric values of the tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 5% are listed in Table-3.1. Photo of Liquid Height for Head Position Photo of Liquid Height for Body Position The dielectric properties of the head tissue simulating liquids are defined in IEEE 1528, and KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. For the body tissue simulating liquids, the dielectric properties are defined in KDB 865664 D01 Appendix A. The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using a dielectric assessment kit and a network analyzer. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 11 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Table-3.1 Targets of Tissue Simulating Liquid Frequency

(MHz) Target Permittivity 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 750 835 900 1450 1640 1750 1800 1900 2000 2300 2450 2600 3500 5200 5300 5500 5600 5800 41.9 41.5 41.5 40.5 40.3 40.1 40.0 40.0 40.0 39.5 39.2 39.0 37.9 36.0 35.9 35.6 35.5 35.3 55.5 55.2 55.0 54.0 53.8 53.4 53.3 53.3 53.3 52.9 52.7 52.5 51.3 49.0 48.9 48.6 48.5 48.2 Range of 5%

For Head 39.8 ~ 44.0 39.4 ~ 43.6 39.4 ~ 43.6 38.5 ~ 42.5 38.3 ~ 42.3 38.1 ~ 42.1 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 38.0 ~ 42.0 37.5 ~ 41.5 37.2 ~ 41.2 37.1 ~ 41.0 36.0 ~ 39.8 34.2 ~ 37.8 34.1 ~ 37.7 33.8 ~ 37.4 33.7 ~ 37.3 33.5 ~ 37.1 For Body 52.7 ~ 58.3 52.4 ~ 58.0 52.3 ~ 57.8 51.3 ~ 56.7 51.1 ~ 56.5 50.7 ~ 56.1 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.6 ~ 56.0 50.3 ~ 55.5 50.1 ~ 55.3 49.9 ~ 55.1 48.7 ~ 53.9 46.6 ~ 51.5 46.5 ~ 51.3 46.2 ~ 51.0 46.1 ~ 50.9 45.8 ~ 50.6 Target Conductivity 0.89 0.90 0.97 1.20 1.29 1.37 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.67 1.80 1.96 2.91 4.66 4.76 4.96 5.07 5.27 0.96 0.97 1.05 1.30 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.81 1.95 2.16 3.31 5.30 5.42 5.65 5.77 6.00 Range of 5%

0.85 ~ 0.93 0.86 ~ 0.95 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.14 ~ 1.26 1.23 ~ 1.35 1.30 ~ 1.44 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.59 ~ 1.75 1.71 ~ 1.89 1.86 ~ 2.06 2.76 ~ 3.06 4.43 ~ 4.89 4.52 ~ 5.00 4.71 ~ 5.21 4.82 ~ 5.32 5.01 ~ 5.53 0.91 ~ 1.01 0.92 ~ 1.02 1.00 ~ 1.10 1.24 ~ 1.37 1.33 ~ 1.47 1.42 ~ 1.56 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.44 ~ 1.60 1.72 ~ 1.90 1.85 ~ 2.05 2.05 ~ 2.27 3.14 ~ 3.48 5.04 ~ 5.57 5.15 ~ 5.69 5.37 ~ 5.93 5.48 ~ 6.06 5.70 ~ 6.30 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 12 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report The following table gives the recipes for tissue simulating liquids. Tissue Type H750 H835 H900 H1450 H1640 H1750 H1800 H1900 H2000 H2300 H2450 H2600 H3500 H5G B750 B835 B900 B1450 B1640 B1750 B1800 B1900 B2000 B2300 B2450 B2600 B3500 B5G Table-3.2 Recipes of Tissue Simulating Liquid Bactericide DGBE HEC NaCl Sucrose Triton X-100 Water Diethylene Glycol Mono-

hexylether 0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43.3 45.8 47.0 44.5 44.5 44.5 44.9 45.0 45.1 8.0

-

-

-

-

34.0 32.5 31.0 29.5 29.5 30.0 31.0 31.4 31.8 28.8

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.2 0.2 0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.5 1.5 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2

-

0.8 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

-

56.0 57.0 58.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

48.8 48.5 48.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20.0 17.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 42.1 41.1 40.2 56.1 53.7 52.6 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.0 54.9 54.8 71.8 65.5 50.0 50.2 50.5 65.7 67.2 68.8 70.1 70.2 69.8 68.9 68.5 68.1 71.1 78.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

17.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.7 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 13 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.3 SAR System Verification The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is performed daily or before every SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurements in the flat section of the phantom with a matched dipole at a specified distance. The system verification setup is shown as below. Fig-3.3 System Verification Setup The validation dipole is placed beneath the flat phantom with the specific spacer in place. The distance spacer is touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking and be oriented parallel to the long side of the phantom. The spectrum analyzer measures the forward power at the location of the system check dipole connector. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power (250 mW is used for 700 MHz to 3 GHz, 100 mW is used for 3.5 GHz to 6 GHz) at the dipole connector and the power meter is read at that level. After connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter. After system check testing, the SAR result will be normalized to 1W forward input power and compared with the reference SAR value derived from validation dipole certificate report. The deviation of system check should be within 10 %. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 14 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4 SAR Measurement Procedure According to the SAR test standard, the recommended procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps:

(a) Power reference measurement

(b) Area scan

(c) Zoom scan

(d) Power drift measurement The SAR measurement procedures for each of test conditions are as follows:

(a) Make EUT to transmit maximum output power

(b) Measure conducted output power through RF cable

(c) Place the EUT in the specific position of phantom

(d) Perform SAR testing steps on the DASY system

(e) Record the SAR value 3.4.1 Area & Zoom Scan Procedure First Area Scan is used to locate the approximate location(s) of the local peak SAR value(s). The measurement grid within an Area Scan is defined by the grid extent, grid step size and grid offset. Next, in order to determine the EM field distribution in a three-dimensional spatial extension, Zoom Scan is required. The Zoom Scan is performed around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 10 g. According to KDB 865664 D01, the resolution for Area and Zoom scan is specified in the table below. Items Area Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(x, y) Zoom Scan

(z) Zoom Scan Volume Note:

<= 2 GHz 2-3 GHz 3-4 GHz 4-5 GHz 5-6 GHz

<= 15 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 12 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 10 mm

<= 8 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 5 mm

<= 4 mm

<= 3 mm

<= 2 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 30 mm

>= 28 mm

>= 25 mm

>= 22 mm When zoom scan is required and report SAR is <= 1.4 W/kg, the zoom scan resolution of x / y (2-3GHz: <= 8 mm, 3-4GHz: <= 7 mm, 4-6GHz: <= 5 mm) may be applied. 3.4.2 Volume Scan Procedure The volume scan is used for assess overlapping SAR distributions for antennas transmitting in different frequency bands. It is equivalent to an oversized zoom scan used in standalone measurements. The measurement volume will be used to enclose all the simultaneous transmitting antennas. For antennas transmitting simultaneously in different frequency bands, the volume scan is measured separately in each frequency band. In order to sum correctly to compute the 1g aggregate SAR, the EUT remain in the same test position for all measurements and all volume scan use the same spatial resolution and grid spacing. When all volume scan were completed, the software, SEMCAD postprocessor can combine and subsequently superpose these measurement data to calculating the multiband SAR. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 15 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 3.4.3 Power Drift Monitoring All SAR testing is under the EUT install full charged battery and transmit maximum output power. In DASY measurement software, the power reference measurement and power drift measurement procedures are used for monitoring the power drift of EUT during SAR test. Both these procedures measure the field at a specified reference position before and after the SAR testing. The software will calculate the field difference in dB. If the power drift more than 5%, the SAR will be retested. 3.4.4 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the test standard. It can be conducted for 1g and 10g, as well as for user-specific masses. The DASY software includes all numerical procedures necessary to evaluate the spatial peak SAR value. The base for the evaluation is a "cube" measurement. The measured volume must include the 1g and 10g cubes with the highest averaged SAR values. For that purpose, the center of the measured volume is aligned to the interpolated peak SAR value of a previously performed area scan. The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The system always gives the maximum values for the 1g and 10g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest averaged SAR is divided into the following stages:

(a) Extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan

(b) Calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and measurement parameters)

(c) Generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume

(d) Interpolation of all measured values form the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid

(e) Extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface

(f) Calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g 3.4.5 SAR Averaged Methods In DASY, the interpolation and extrapolation are both based on the modified Quadratic Shepards method. The interpolation scheme combines a least-square fitted function method and a weighted average method which are the two basic types of computational interpolation and approximation. Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and 10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5 mm. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 16 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4. SAR Measurement Evaluation 4.1 EUT Configuration and Setting

<Considerations Related to WLAN for Setup and Testing>

In general, various vendor specific external test software and chipset based internal test modes are typically used for SAR measurement. These chipset based test mode utilities are generally hardware and manufacturer dependent, and often include substantial flexibility to reconfigure or reprogram a device. A Wi-Fi device must be configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools for SAR measurement. The test frequencies established using test mode must correspond to the actual channel frequencies. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. In addition, a periodic transmission duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR correctly. The reported SAR must be scaled to 100%

transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. According to KDB 248227 D01, this device has installed WLAN engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During WLAN SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. Initial Test Configuration An initial test configuration is determined for OFDM transmission modes in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands according to the channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate combination(s) with the highest maximum output power specified for production units in each standalone and aggregated frequency band. When the same maximum power is specified for multiple transmission modes in a frequency band, the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order 802.11a/g/n/ac mode is used for SAR measurement, on the highest measured output power channel in the initial test configuration, for each frequency band. Subsequent Test Configuration SAR measurement requirements for the remaining 802.11 transmission mode configurations that have not been tested in the initial test configuration are determined separately for each standalone and aggregated frequency band, in each exposure condition, according to the maximum output power specified for production units. Additional power measurements may be required to determine if SAR measurements are required for subsequent highest output power channels in a subsequent test configuration. When the highest reported SAR for the initial test configuration according to the initial test position or fixed exposure position requirements, is adjusted by the ratio of the subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration specified maximum output power and the adjusted SAR is 1.2 W/kg, SAR is not required for that subsequent test configuration. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 17 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report SAR Test Configuration and Channel Selection When multiple channel bandwidth configurations in a frequency band have the same specified maximum output power, the initial test configuration is using largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate, and lowest order 802.11 mode (i.e., 802.11a is chosen over 802.11n then 802.11ac or 802.11g is chosen over 802.11n). After an initial test configuration is determined, if multiple test channels have the same measured maximum output power, the channel chosen for SAR measurement is determined according to the following. 1) The channel closest to mid-band frequency is selected for SAR measurement. 2) For channels with equal separation from mid-band frequency; for example, high and low channels or two mid-band channels, the higher frequency (number) channel is selected for SAR measurement.

<Considerations Related to Bluetooth for Setup and Testing>

This device has installed Bluetooth engineering testing software which can provide continuous transmitting RF signal. During Bluetooth SAR testing, this device was operated to transmit continuously at the maximum transmission duty with specified transmission mode, operating frequency, lowest data rate, and maximum output power. 4.2 EUT Testing Position 4.2.1 Extremity Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires 1-g SAR, and the wrist-worn condition requires 10-g extremity SAR. The 10-g extremity and 1-g SAR test exclusions may be applied to the wrist and face exposure conditions. When SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. SAR for wrist exposure is evaluated with the back of the devices positioned in direct contact against a flat phantom fill with body tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be unstrapped and touching the phantom. The space introduced by the watch or wrist bands and the phantom must be representative of actual use conditions. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 18 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.2.2 Face Exposure Conditions Transmitters that are built-in within a wrist watch or similar wrist-worn devices typically operate in speaker mode for voice communication, with the device worn on the wrist and positioned next to the mouth. Next to the mouth exposure requires face SAR. When face SAR evaluation is required, next to the mouth use is evaluated with the front of the device positioned at 10 mm from a flat phantom filled with head tissue-equivalent medium. The wrist bands should be strapped together to represent normal use conditions. 10 mm Fig-4.1 Illustration for Smart watch Setup 4.3 Tissue Verification The measuring results for tissue simulating liquid are shown as below. Test Date Mar. 16, 2018 Mar. 16, 2018 Note:

Tissue Type Head Body Frequency

(MHz) 2450 2450 Liquid Temp.

() 23.3 23.4 Measured Measured Target Target Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Conductivity Permittivity Deviation Deviation

() 1.87 2.047

(r) 37.896 50.8

() 1.80 1.95

(r) 39.2 52.7

(%) 3.89 4.97

(%)

-3.33

-3.61 The dielectric properties of the tissue simulating liquid must be measured within 24 hours before the SAR testing and within 5% of the target values. Liquid temperature during the SAR testing must be within 2 . Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 19 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.4 System Validation The SAR measurement system was validated according to procedures in KDB 865664 D01. The validation status in tabulated summary is as below. Test Date Mar. 16, 2018 Mar. 16, 2018 Probe S/N 3578 3578 Measured Measured Validation for CW Validation for Modulation Calibration Point Conductivity Permittivity Sensitivity Probe Probe Modulation

(r) Range Linearity Isotropy Type Duty Factor PAR Head Body 2450 2450

() 1.87 2.047 37.896 50.8 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass OFDM OFDM N/A N/A Pass Pass 4.5 System Verification The measuring result for system verification is tabulated as below. Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) SAR-1g

(W/kg) Mar. 16, 2018 Head 2450 50.80 13.40 Test Date Mode Frequency

(MHz) 1W Target Measured SAR-10g SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) Mar. 16, 2018 Body 2450 23.40 5.76 Note:

Normalized to 1W SAR-1g

(W/kg) 53.60 Normalized Deviation

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N 5.51 737 3578 360 to 1W Deviation SAR-10g

(%) Dipole S/N Probe S/N DAE S/N

(W/kg) 23.04

-1.54 737 3578 360 Comparing to the reference SAR value provided by SPEAG, the validation data should be within its specification of 10 %. The result indicates the system check can meet the variation criterion and the plots can be referred to Appendix A of this report. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 20 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.6 Maximum Output Power 4.6.1 Maximum Target Conducted Power The maximum conducted average power (Unit: dBm) including tune-up tolerance is shown as below. Mode 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n HT20 Mode Bluetooth DH Bluetooth LE 2.4G WLAN 16.0 11.0 11.0 2.4G Bluetooth 13.0 4.0 4.6.2 Measured Conducted Power Result The measuring conducted average power (Unit: dBm) is shown as below.

<WLAN 2.4G>

Mode 802.11b

<Bluetooth>

Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power 1 6 11 2412 2437 2462 15.32 15.43 15.20 Mode Channel Frequency (MHz) Average Power Bluetooth BDR/GFSK Bluetooth EDR/DPSK Bluetooth 2EDR/8DPSK Bluetooth LE 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 39 78 0 19 39 2402 2441 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 2402 2440 2480 12.82 12.79 12.64 10.59 10.52 10.32 10.5 10.43 10.29 3.21 3.25 3.12 Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 21 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7 SAR Testing Results 4.7.1 SAR Test Reduction Considerations

<KDB 447498 D01, General RF Exposure Guidance>

Testing of other required channels within the operating mode of a frequency band is not required when the reported SAR for the mid-band or highest output power channel is:

(1) 0.8 W/kg or 2.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 100 MHz

(2) 0.6 W/kg or 1.5 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is between 100 MHz and 200 MHz

(3) 0.4 W/kg or 1.0 W/kg, for 1-g or 10-g respectively, when the transmission band is 200 MHz

<KDB 248227 D01, SAR Guidance for Wi-Fi Transmitters>

(1) For handsets operating next to ear, hotspot mode or mini-tablet configurations, the initial test position procedures were applied. The test position with the highest extrapolated peak SAR will be used as the initial test position. When the reported SAR of initial test position is <= 0.4 W/kg, SAR testing for remaining test positions is not required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the subsequent highest peak SAR positions until the reported SAR result is <= 0.8 W/kg or all test positions are measured.

(2) For WLAN 2.4 GHz, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS was selected for SAR measurement. When the reported SAR is <= 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required. Otherwise, SAR is evaluated at the next highest measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third channel. For OFDM modes (802.11g/n), SAR is not required when the highest reported SAR for DSSS is adjusted by the ratio of OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power and it is <= 1.2 W/kg. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 22 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 4.7.2 SAR Results for Face Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 10 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle 01 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Front Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Front Face Front Face Front Face Front Face BDR BDR BDR BT BT BT 02 6 1 11 0 39 78 97.50 97.50 97.50 76.50 76.50 76.50 Crest Factor 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.43 15.32 15.20 12.82 12.79 12.64 Scaling Factor 1.14 1.17 1.20 1.04 1.05 1.09 Power Drift

(dB) 0.15

-0.08 0.04 0.10 0.07

-0.04 Measured SAR-1g

(W/kg) Scaled SAR-1g

(W/kg) 0.067 0.057 0.042 0.033 0.029 0.024 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 4.7.3 SAR Results for Extremity Exposure Condition (Test Separation Distance is 0 mm) Plot No. Band Mode Test Position Ch. Duty Cycle 03 WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face WLAN2.4G 802.11b Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face Rear Face BDR BDR BDR BT BT BT 04 6 1 11 0 39 78 97.50 97.50 97.50 76.50 76.50 76.50 Crest Factor 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.31 1.31 1.31 Max. Tune-up Power

(dBm) 16.0 16.0 16.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Measured Conducted Power

(dBm) 15.43 15.32 15.20 12.82 12.79 12.64 Scaling Factor 1.14 1.17 1.20 1.04 1.05 1.09 Power Drift

(dB) 0.09 0.03 0.08

-0.15

-0.13 0.02 Measured SAR-10g Scaled SAR-10g

(W/kg)

(W/kg) 0.106 0.087 0.085 0.038 0.034 0.028 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.04 4.7.4 SAR Measurement Variability According to KDB 865664 D01, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency band, which is determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media are required for SAR measurements in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures should be applied to the tissue medium with the highest measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. Alternatively, if the highest measured SAR for both head and body tissue-equivalent media are 1.45 W/kg and the ratio of these highest SAR values, i.e., largest divided by smallest value, is 1.10, the highest SAR configuration for either head or body tissue-equivalent medium may be used to perform the repeated measurement. These additional measurements are repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring the same head or body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device should be returned to ambient conditions (normal room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it is re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated results. Since all the measured SAR are less than 0.8 W/kg, the repeated measurement is not required. 4.7.5 Simultaneous Multi-band Transmission Evaluation There is no simultaneous transmission configuration in this device. Test EngineerJames Chu Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 23 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 SN 737 3578 360 FCC SAR Test Report 5. Calibration of Test Equipment Equipment Manufacturer Model Cal. Date Cal. Interval System Validation Dipole Dosimetric E-Field Probe Data Acquisition Electronics Spectrum Analyzer ENA Series Network Analyzer MXG Analong Signal Generator Vector Signal Generator Power Meter Power Sensor Thermometer Dielectric Assessment Kit SPEAG SPEAG SPEAG R&S Agilent Agilent Anritsu Anritsu Anritsu YFE SPEAG D2450V2 EX3DV4 DAE3 FSL6 E5071C N5181A Aug. 17, 2017 May. 05, 2017 Nov. 02, 2017 102006 Mar. 27, 2017 MY46214281 Jun. 09, 2017 MY50143868 Jul. 10, 2017 MG3710A 6201599977 Mar. 27, 2017 ML2495A MA2411B YF-160A DAK-3.5 1218009 1207252 Jul. 12, 2017 Jul. 12, 2017 130504591 Mar. 24, 2017 1047 Aug. 15, 2017 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 24 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report 6. Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Taiwan HwaYa EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab:

Add: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Vil., Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-318-3232 Fax: 886-3-327-0892 Taiwan LinKo EMC/RF Lab:

Add: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-2-2605-2180 Fax: 886-2-2605-1924 Taiwan HsinChu EMC/RF Lab:

Add: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-3-593-5343 Fax: 886-3-593-5342 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.adt.com.tw The road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

---END---

Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Page No.

: 25 of 25 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 FCC SAR Test Report Appendix A. SAR Plots of System Verification The plots for system verification with largest deviation for each SAR system combination are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/16 System Check_H2450_180316 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N2_0316 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 1.87 S/m; r = 37.896; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.6 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.44, 7.44, 7.44); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 22.7 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 106.9 V/m; Power Drift = 0.04 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 28.7 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 13.4 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 6.1 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 23.0 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/16 System Check_B2450_180316 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; SN: 737 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0316 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; = 2.047 S/m; r = 50.8; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.43, 7.43, 7.43); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373) Pin=250mW/Area Scan (81x81x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 20.4 W/kg Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 94.64 V/m; Power Drift = -0.11 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 25.5 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 12.4 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 5.76 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 20.8 W/kg FCC SAR Test Report Appendix B. SAR Plots of SAR Measurement The SAR plots for highest measured SAR in each exposure configuration, wireless mode and frequency band combination, and measured SAR > 1.5 W/kg are shown as follows. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 Issued Date

: May 30, 2018 Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/16 P01 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Front Face_10mm_Ch6 DUT: 180209C23 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N2_0316 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 1.855 S/m; r = 37.938; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.6 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.44, 7.44, 7.44); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0790 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 6.721 V/m; Power Drift = 0.15 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.116 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.067 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.035 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0877 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/16 P02 BT_BR_EDR_Front Face_10mm_Ch0 DUT: 180209C23 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: H19T27N2_0316 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.82 S/m; r = 38.083; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.6 ; Liquid Temperature23.3 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.44, 7.44, 7.44); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1653; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.0408 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.689 V/m; Power Drift = 0.10 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.0570 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.033 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.018 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.0443 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/16 P03 WLAN2.4G_802.11b_Rear Face_0mm_Ch6 DUT: 180209C23 Communication System: WLAN_2.4G; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0316 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; = 2.032 S/m; r = 50.836; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.43, 7.43, 7.43); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.363 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 5.630 V/m; Power Drift = 0.09 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.793 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.263 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.106 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.629 W/kg Test Laboratory: Bureau Veritas ADT SAR/HAC Testing Lab Date: 2018/03/16 P04 BT_BR_EDR_Rear Face_0mm_Ch0 DUT: 180209C23 Communication System: BT; Frequency: 2402 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: B19T27N1_0316 Medium parameters used: f = 2402 MHz; = 1.99 S/m; r = 50.939; =

1000 kg/m3 Ambient Temperature23.7 ; Liquid Temperature23.4 DASY5 Configuration:

- Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3578; ConvF(7.43, 7.43, 7.43); Calibrated: 2017/05/05;

- Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)

- Electronics: DAE3 Sn360; Calibrated: 2017/11/02

- Phantom: Twin SAM Phantom_1652; Type: QD000P40;

- Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.8 (8); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.10 (7373)

- Area Scan (71x71x1): Interpolated grid: dx=1.200 mm, dy=1.200 mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.185 W/kg

- Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 8.082 V/m; Power Drift = -0.15 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.206 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.084 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.038 W/kg Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.156 W/kg

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of EUT>

<Antenna Location>

WLAN/BT Antenna The separation distance for antenna to edge:

<EUT Front View>

Antenna WLAN / BT Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31 To Top Side To Bottom Side To Left Side To Right Side

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0 FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of SAR Setup>

Front Face of EUT at 10 mm Rear Face of EUT at 0 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C31

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of EUT>

<Antenna Location>

WLAN/BT Antenna The separation distance for antenna to edge:

<EUT Front View>

Antenna WLAN / BT Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29 To Top Side To Bottom Side To Left Side To Right Side

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0 FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of SAR Setup>

Face - Front Face of EUT at 10 mm Extremity - Rear Face of EUT at 0 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C29

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of EUT>

<Antenna Location>

WLAN/BT Antenna

<EUT Front View>

The separation distance for antenna to edge:

Antenna WLAN / BT Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33 To Top Side To Bottom Side To Left Side To Right Side

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0 FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of SAR Setup>

Face - Front Face of EUT at 10 mm Extremity - Rear Face of EUT at 0 mm

(Neck-Phantom) Extremity - Rear Face of EUT at 0 mm

(Flat-Phantom) Note: There has separation distance between Smart watch and Flat-phantom when tests on rear face. Therefore, we add additional test with neck portion to verify the worst case which has been evaluated. Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180420C33

 

 

FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of EUT>

<Antenna Location>

WLAN/BT Antenna The separation distance for antenna to edge:

<EUT Front View>

Antenna WLAN / BT Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22 To Top Side To Bottom Side To Left Side To Right Side

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0

(mm) 0 FCC SAR Test Report

<Photographs of SAR Setup>

Rear Face of EUT at 0 mm Front Face of EUT at 10 mm Report Format Version 5.0.0 Report No. : SA180209C22

 

 

FCC Test Report Report No.: RF180209C22-1 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A Test Model: DW6F1 Series Model: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Received Date: Feb. 09, 2018 Test Date: Mar. 28, 2018 ~ May 31, 2018 Issued Date: Jun. 01, 2018 Applicant: Fossil Group, Inc. Address: 901 S. Central Expwy., Richardson, TX 75080 USA Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lab Address: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan

( R.O.C ) Test Location: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. FCC Registration /

Designation Number:

788550 / TW0003 This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Page No. 1 / 55 Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Certificate of Conformity ........................................................................................................................... 5 2 Summary of Test Results ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Modification Record .............................................................................................................................. 7 3 General Information ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 General Description of EUT .................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Description of Test Modes ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail .................................................................. 10 3.3 Duty Cycle of Test Signal ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Description of Support Units ............................................................................................................... 12 3.4.1 Configuration of System under Test ......................................................................................... 12 3.5 General Description of Applied Standards .......................................................................................... 12 4 Test Types and Results ............................................................................................................................ 13 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement .............................................................................. 13 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement ..................................................... 13 4.1.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 14 4.1.3 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 16 4.1.5 Test Set Up ............................................................................................................................... 16 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 17 4.1.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 18 4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement .................................................................................................... 32 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement ........................................................................... 32 4.2.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.3 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 33 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 33 4.2.5 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 33 4.2.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 33 4.2.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 34 4.3 Number of Hopping Frequency Used ................................................................................................. 36 4.3.1 Limits of Hopping Frequency Used Measurement ................................................................... 36 4.3.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 36 4.3.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 36 4.3.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 36 4.3.5 Deviation fromTest Standard .................................................................................................... 36 4.3.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Dwell Time on Each Channel .............................................................................................................. 38 4.4.1 Limits of Dwell Time on Each Channel Measurement .............................................................. 38 4.4.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 38 4.4.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 38 4.4.4 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 38 4.4.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 38 4.4.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 39 4.5 Channel Bandwidth ............................................................................................................................. 41 4.5.1 Limits of Channel Bandwidth Measurement ............................................................................. 41 4.5.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 41 4.5.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 41 4.5.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 41 4.5.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 41 4.5.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 41 4.5.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 42 4.6 Occupied Bandwidth Measurement .................................................................................................... 43 Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 2 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6.1 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 43 4.6.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 43 4.6.3 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 43 4.6.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 43 4.6.5 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 43 4.6.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 44 4.7 Hopping Channel Separation .............................................................................................................. 45 4.7.1 Limits of Hopping Channel Separation Measurement .............................................................. 45 4.7.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 45 4.7.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 45 4.7.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 45 4.7.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 45 4.7.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 46 4.8 Maximum Output Power ..................................................................................................................... 47 4.8.1 Limits of Maximum Output Power Measurement ..................................................................... 47 4.8.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 47 4.8.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 47 4.8.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 47 4.8.5 Deviation fromTest Standard .................................................................................................... 47 4.8.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 47 4.8.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 48 4.9 Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement ............................................................................... 49 4.9.1 Limits Of Conducted Out Of Band Emission Measurement ..................................................... 49 4.9.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 49 4.9.3 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 49 4.9.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 49 4.9.5 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 49 4.9.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 49 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements................................................................................................................ 54 Appendix Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................ 55 Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 3 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Issue No. Description RF180209C22-1 Original Release Release Control Record Date Issued Jun. 01, 2018 Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 4 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 1 Certificate of Conformity Product: Smart Watch Test Model: DW6F1 Series Model: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Sample Status:

Identical Prototype Applicant: Fossil Group, Inc. Test Date: Mar. 28, 2018 ~ May 31, 2018 Standards: 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) ANSI C63.10:2013 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples RF characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by :

, Date:

Jun. 01, 2018 Approved by

:

Gina Liu / Specialist

, Date:

Jun. 01, 2018 Dylan Chiou / Project Engineer Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 5 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 2 Summary of Test Results FCC Clause Test Item Result Remarks 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) 15.207 AC Power Conducted Emission Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Minimum passing margin is -16.89 dB at 0.55273 MHz. 15.247(a)(1)

(iii) 15.247(a)(1)

(iii) Number of Hopping Frequency Used Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Dwell Time on Each Channel Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 1. Hopping Channel Separation 15.247(a)(1) 2. Spectrum Bandwidth of a Frequency Hopping Sequence Spread Spectrum System Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.247(b) Maximum Peak Output Power Pass Meet the requirement of limit.

---

Occupied Bandwidth Measurement Pass Reference only 15.205 & 209 Radiated Emissions Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Minimum passing margin is -6.4 dB at 60.95 MHz. 15.247(d) 15.247(d) 15.203 Band Edge Measurement Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Antenna Port Emission Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Antenna Requirement Pass No antenna connector is used. Note: If The Frequency Hopping System operating in 2400-2483.5 MHz band and the output power less than 125 mW. The hopping channel carrier frequencies separated by a minimum of 25 kHz or two-thirds of the 20 dB bandwidth of hopping channel whichever is greater. 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT:

The listed uncertainties are the worst case uncertainty for the entire range of measurement. Please note that the uncertainty values are provided for informational purposes only and are not used in determining the PASS/FAIL results. Measurement Frequency Conducted Emissions at mains ports 150 kHz ~ 30 MHz Radiated Emissions up to 30 MHz 9 kHz ~ 30 MHz Radiated Emissions up to 1 GHz Radiated Emissions above 1 GHz 30 MHz ~ 200 MHz 200 MHz ~1000 MHz 1 GHz ~ 18 GHz 18 GHz ~ 40 GHz Expended Uncertainty

(k=2) () 2.44 dB 2.855 dB 2.93 dB 2.95 dB 2.26 dB 1.94 dB Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 6 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 2.2 Modification Record There were no modifications required for compliance. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 7 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3 General Information 3.1 General Description of EUT Product Test Model Series Model Status of EUT Power Supply Rating Smart Watch DW6F1 DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Identical Prototype 5 Vdc (host equipment) 3.8 Vdc (battery) Modulation Type GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8DPSK Transfer Rate 1/2/3 Mbps Operating Frequency 2402 ~ 2480 MHz Number of Channel 79 Output Power Antenna Type Antenna Connector 21.429 mW Loop antenna N/A Accessory Device Refer to Note as below Data Cable Supplied Refer to Note as below Note:

1. All models are listed as below. Model DW6F1 DW6A1 DW6B1 DW6D1 2.4G / BT Antenna Gain (dBi) GPS

-5.6

-5.67

-7.12

-5.75

-7.03

-7.22

-8.86

-7.76 Description The models have the same layout, circuit, LCD panel and components, but different appearance & brand. Therefore, only DW6F1 was chosen for worst test. 2. The EUT accessories list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. 3. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 8 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.2 Description of Test Modes 79 channels are provided to this EUT:

Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 2418 2419 2420 2421 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 2454 2455 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 2462 2463 2464 2465 2466 2467 2468 2469 2470 2471 2472 2473 2474 2475 2476 2477 2478 2479 2480 Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 9 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail EUT Configure Mode Applicable To RE1G RE<1G PLC APCM Description

-

-

Where RE1G: Radiated Emission above 1 GHz RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1 GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission Note:

1. For Radiated emission test, pre-tested GFSK, /4-DQPSK, 8DPSK modulation type and found 8DPSK was the worse, therefore APCM: Antenna Port Conducted Measurement chosen for the final test and presented in the test report. 2. The EUT had been pre-tested on the positioned of each 3 axis. The worst case was found when positioned on Z-plane. 3. - means no effect. Radiated Emission Test (Above 1 GHz):

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode Available Channel Tested Channel

-

-

0 to 78 0 to 78 0, 39, 78 0, 39, 78 Modulation Technology FHSS FHSS Modulation Type Packet Type GFSK 8DPSK DH5 3DH5 Radiated Emission Test (Below 1 GHz):

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode Available Channel Tested Channel Modulation Technology Modulation Type Packet Type

-

0 to 78 0 FHSS 8DPSK 3DH5 Power Line Conducted Emission Test:

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode Available Channel Tested Channel Modulation Technology Modulation Type Packet Type

-

0 to 78 0 FHSS 8DPSK 3DH5 Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 10 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Antenna Port Conducted Measurement:

This item includes all test value of each mode, but only includes spectrum plot of worst value of each mode. Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode Available Channel Tested Channel

-

-

0 to 78 0 to 78 0, 39, 78 0, 39, 78 Modulation Technology FHSS FHSS Modulation Type Packet Type GFSK 8DPSK DH5 3DH5 Test Condition:

Applicable To Environmental Conditions Input Power Tested by RE1G RE<1G PLC APCM 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz Greg Lin Luis Lee 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz Jones Chang 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 3.8 Vdc Carlos Chen 3.3 Duty Cycle of Test Signal Duty cycle of test signal is < 98 %

Duty cycle = 2.86859/3.75 = 0.765, Duty factor = 10 * log(1/0.765) = 1.16 GFSK Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 11 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.4 Description of Support Units The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the Product Bluetooth Tester Adapter Brand R&S HTC Model No. CBT TC U250 Serial No. FCC ID 100980 N/A N/A N/A Signal Cable Description Of The Above Support Units tests. No. 1. 2. No. 1. 2. N/A N/A Note:

1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m). 2. Item 1 acted as communication partner to transfer data. 3.4.1 Configuration of System under Test

*Test Table

*Kept in remote area EUT

(Power from adapter) Bluetooth Tester 3.5 General Description of Applied Standards The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards:

FCC Part 15, Subpart C (15.247) FCC Public Notice DA 00-705 ANSI C63.10-2013 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. Note: The EUT has been verified to comply with the requirements of FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B (DoC). The test report has been issued separately. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 12 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4 Test Types and Results 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement Radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands must comply with the radiated emission limits specified as below table. Other emissions shall be at least 20 dB below the highest level of the desired power:

Frequencies

(MHz) 0.009 ~ 0.490 0.490 ~ 1.705 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 ~ 88 88 ~ 216 216 ~ 960 Above 960 Field Strength

(microvolts/meter) 2400/F (kHz) 24000/F (kHz) 30 100 150 200 500 Measurement Distance (meters) 300 30 30 3 3 3 3 Note:

1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. For frequencies above 1000 MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20 dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 13 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.2 Test Instruments Description &

Manaufacturer Test Receiver ROHDE & SCHWARZ Spectrum Analyzer ROHDE & SCHWARZ BILOG Antenna SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna SCHWARZBECK Model No. Serial No. Date of Calibration Due Date of Calibration ESCI 100424 Oct. 17, 2017 Oct. 16, 2018 FSP40 100041 Dec. 12, 2017 Dec. 11, 2018 VULB9168 9168-171 Dec. 11, 2017 Dec. 10, 2018 9120D 209 Dec. 13, 2017 Dec. 12, 2018 BBHA 9170 BBHA9170241 Dec. 01, 2017 Nov. 30, 2018 Loop Antenna 6509 00217556 Aug. 31, 2017 Aug. 30, 2018 Preamplifier Agilent

(Below 1GHz) Preamplifier Agilent

(Above 1GHz) RF signal cable HUBER+SUHNER RF signal cable HUBER+SUHNER&

EMCI Software BV ADT Antenna Tower inn-co GmbH Antenna Tower Controller BV ADT Turn Table BV ADT Turn Table Controller BV ADT High Speed Peak Power Meter Power Sensor 8447D 2944A10738 Aug. 21, 2017 Aug. 20, 2018 8449B 3008A01923 Oct. 23, 2017 Oct. 22, 2018 SUCOFLEX 104 SUCOFLEX 104&EMC104-SM-

SM-8000 ADT_Radiated_ V7.6.15.9.4 Cable-CH3-03

(223653/4) Cable-CH3-03

(309224+170907) NA MA 4000 013303 AT100 AT93021702 TT100 TT93021702 SC100 SC93021702 Aug. 21, 2017 Aug. 20, 2018 Sep.11, 2017 Sep. 10, 2018 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ML2495A MA2411B 0824012 Aug. 18, 2017 Aug. 17, 2018 0738171 Aug. 18, 2017 Aug. 17, 2018 Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 3. 3. The horn antenna and preamplifier (model: 8449B) are used only for the measurement of emission frequency above 1 GHz if tested. 4. The FCC Designation Number is TW0003. The number will be varied with the Lab location and scope as attached. 5. The IC Site Registration No. is IC 7450F-3. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 14 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.3 Test Procedures For Radiated Emission below 30 MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter chamber room. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. Parallel, perpendicular, and ground-parallel orientations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Quasi-Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. Note:

1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 9 kHz at frequency below 30 MHz. 2. There is a comparison data of both open-field test site and semi-Anechoic chamber, and the result came out very similar. For Radiated Emission above 30 MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters (for 30 MHz ~ 1 GHz) / 1.5 meters (for above 1 GHz) above the ground at 3 meter chamber room for test. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The height of antenna is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is below 1 GHz. f. The test-receiver system was set to peak and average detected function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is above 1 GHz. If the peak reading value also meets average limit, measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. Note:

1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120 kHz for Quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency below 1 GHz. 2. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and the video bandwidth is 3 MHz for Peak detection (PK) at frequency above 1 GHz. 3. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and the video bandwidth is 1/T

(Duty cycle < 98 %) or 10 Hz (Duty cycle 98 %) for Average detection (AV) at frequency above 1 GHz.

(RBW = 1 MHz, VBW = 1 kHz) 4. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 15 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.1.5 Test Set Up

<Radiated emission below 30 MHz>

EUT&

Support Units 3m Turn Table 80cm 1 m

<Frequency Range below 1 GHz>

Ground Plane Test Receiver 3m Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 16 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 10mAnt. Tower1-4m VariableTurn TableEUT& Support UnitsGround PlaneTest Receiver80cm

<Frequency Range above 1 GHz>

EUT&

Support Units 3m Ant. Tower 1-4m Variable Turn Table Absorber 150cm Ground Plane Test Receiver For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions Set the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 17 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.7 Test Results ABOVE 1GHz DATA BT_GFSK CHANNEL TX Channel 0 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 18 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2390.00 2390.00 56.1 PK 44.0 AV

*2402.00 101.5 PK

*2402.00 4804.00 4804.00 71.4 AV 42.2 PK 12.1 AV LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.9

-10.0

-31.8

-41.9 1.68 H 1.68 H 1.73 H 1.73 H 1.55 H 1.55 H 119 119 124 124 217 217 23.90 11.80 69.30 39.20 41.10 11.00 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 1.10 1.10 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2390.00 2390.00 56.4 PK 44.4 AV

*2402.00 104.9 PK

*2402.00 4804.00 4804.00 74.8 AV 42.7 PK 12.6 AV REMARKS:

LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.6

-9.6

-31.3

-41.4 1.02 V 1.02 V 1.12 V 1.12 V 1.82 V 1.82 V 248 248 236 236 302 302 24.20 12.20 72.70 42.60 41.60 11.50 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 1.10 1.10 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 19 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 39 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 20 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4

*2441.00 101.3 PK

*2441.00 4882.00 4882.00 71.2 AV 42.6 PK 12.5 AV 74.0 54.0

-31.4

-41.5 1.63 H 1.63 H 1.19 H 1.19 H 137 137 24 24 69.30 39.20 41.20 11.10 32.00 32.00 1.40 1.40 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4

*2441.00 105.7 PK

*2441.00 4882.00 4882.00 75.6 AV 42.8 PK 12.7 AV 74.0 54.0

-31.2

-41.3 1.17 V 1.17 V 1.78 V 1.78 V 264 264 308 308 73.70 43.60 41.40 11.30 32.00 32.00 1.40 1.40 REMARKS:

1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 21 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 78 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 22 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2480.00 101.3 PK

*2480.00 2483.50 2483.50 4960.00 4960.00 71.2 AV 46.7 PK 16.6 AV 42.8 PK 12.7 AV LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-27.3

-37.4

-31.2

-41.3 1.76 H 1.76 H 1.68 H 1.68 H 1.67 H 1.67 H 133 133 123 123 229 229 69.20 39.10 52.20 22.10 40.90 10.80 32.10 32.10

-5.50

-5.50 1.90 1.90 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2480.00 105.7 PK

*2480.00 75.6 AV 2483.50 2483.50 4960.00 4960.00 47.1 PK 17.0 AV 43.7 PK 13.6 AV REMARKS:

LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-26.9

-37.0

-30.3

-40.4 1.12 V 1.12 V 1.21 V 1.21 V 1.92 V 1.92 V 261 261 243 243 315 315 73.60 43.50 52.60 22.50 41.80 11.70 32.10 32.10

-5.50

-5.50 1.90 1.90 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 23 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 BT_8DPSK CHANNEL TX Channel 0 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz Horizontal DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 24 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2390.00 2390.00 56.0 PK 44.1 AV

*2402.00 100.8 PK

*2402.00 4804.00 4804.00 70.7 AV 42.3 PK 12.2 AV LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-18.0

-9.9

-31.7

-41.8 1.76 H 1.76 H 1.66 H 1.66 H 1.64 H 1.64 H 122 122 128 128 225 225 23.80 11.90 68.60 38.50 41.20 11.10 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 1.10 1.10 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2390.00 2390.00 56.7 PK 44.6 AV

*2402.00 104.1 PK

*2402.00 4804.00 4804.00 74.0 AV 42.8 PK 12.7 AV REMARKS:

LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.3

-9.4

-31.2

-41.3 1.12 V 1.12 V 1.02 V 1.02 V 1.78 V 1.78 V 257 257 247 247 284 284 24.50 12.40 71.90 41.80 41.70 11.60 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 1.10 1.10 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 25 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 39 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 26 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4

*2441.00 101.8 PK

*2441.00 4882.00 4882.00 71.7 AV 42.3 PK 12.2 AV 74.0 54.0

-31.7

-41.8 1.78 H 1.78 H 1.47 H 1.47 H 129 129 196 196 69.80 39.70 40.90 10.80 32.00 32.00 1.40 1.40 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4

*2441.00 103.6 PK

*2441.00 4882.00 4882.00 73.5 AV 43.0 PK 12.9 AV 74.0 54.0

-31.0

-41.1 1.13 V 1.13 V 1.75 V 1.75 V 242 242 309 309 71.60 41.50 41.60 11.50 32.00 32.00 1.40 1.40 REMARKS:

1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 27 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 78 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 28 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2480.00 101.4 PK

*2480.00 2483.50 2483.50 4960.00 4960.00 71.3 AV 46.7 PK 16.6 AV 42.7 PK 12.6 AV LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-27.3

-37.4

-31.3

-41.4 1.68 H 1.68 H 1.77 H 1.77 H 1.58 H 1.58 H 137 137 143 143 211 211 69.30 39.20 52.20 22.10 40.80 10.70 32.10 32.10

-5.50

-5.50 1.90 1.90 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2480.00 103.3 PK

*2480.00 73.2 AV 2483.50 2483.50 4960.00 4960.00 47.2 PK 17.1 AV 43.8 PK 13.7 AV REMARKS:

LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-26.8

-36.9

-30.2

-40.3 1.04 V 1.04 V 1.17 V 1.17 V 1.83 V 1.83 V 257 257 244 244 312 312 71.20 41.10 52.70 22.60 41.90 11.80 32.10 32.10

-5.50

-5.50 1.90 1.90 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 29 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 9 kHz ~ 30 MHz Data:

The amplitude of spurious emissions attenuated more than 20 dB below the permissible value is not required to be report. 30 MHz ~ 1 GHz Worst-Case Data: 8DPSK CHANNEL TX Channel 0 FREQUENCY RANGE 30MHz ~ 1GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Quasi-Peak (QP) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 30 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 FREQ.

(MHz) 37.66 101.69 272.45 375.29 445.15 939.95 FREQ.

(MHz) 60.95 109.46 272.45 375.29 445.15 951.59 REMARKS:

EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 32.8 QP 23.6 QP 23.7 QP 30.7 QP 28.2 QP 39.6 QP EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 33.6 QP 27.9 QP 21.0 QP 30.4 QP 26.9 QP 33.3 QP ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION 40.0 43.5 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0

-7.2

-19.9

-22.3

-15.3

-17.8

-6.4 1.51 H 1.51 H 1.00 H 1.00 H 2.00 H 1.51 H 281 232 120 276 190 7 47.80 41.70 36.60 41.40 37.40 38.80 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION 40.0 43.5 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0

-6.4

-15.6

-25.0

-15.6

-19.1

-12.7 1.50 V 1.50 V 1.99 V 1.00 V 1.00 V 1.00 V 261 230 173 192 291 76 48.00 44.90 33.90 41.10 36.10 32.30 FACTOR

(dB/m)

-15.00

-18.10

-12.90

-10.70

-9.20 0.80 FACTOR

(dB/m)

-14.40

-17.00

-12.90

-10.70

-9.20 1.00 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 31 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement Frequency (MHz) 0.15 - 0.5 0.50 - 5.0 5.0 - 30.0 Conducted Limit (dBuV) Quasi-peak 66 - 56 56 60 Average 56 - 46 46 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz. 4.2.2 Test Instruments Description &

Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Date Of Calibration Due Date Of Calibration ESCI 5D-FB 100613 Nov. 22, 2018 Nov. 23, 2017 Cable-cond1-01 Test Receiver ROHDE & SCHWARZ RF signal cable (with 10dB PAD) Woken LISN/AMN ROHDE & SCHWARZ

(EUT) LISN/AMN ROHDE & SCHWARZ

(Peripheral) Software ADT Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable BV ADT_Cond_ Sep. 05, 2017 Sep. 04, 2018 Aug. 15, 2017 Aug. 14, 2018 Mar. 06, 2018 Mar. 05, 2019 835239/001 ESH3-Z5 ESH3-Z5 V7.3.7.3 100311 NA NA NA to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Shielded Room 1. 3. The VCCI Site Registration No. is C-2040. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 32 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.2.3 Test Procedures a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/ 50 uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The frequency range from 150 kHz to 30 MHz was searched. Emission levels under (Limit 20 dB) was not recorded. Note: All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.2.5 Test Setup For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.2.6 EUT Operating Condition Set the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 33 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Note: 1.Support units were connected to second LISN. 2.Both of LISNs (AMN) are 80 cm from EUT and at least 80cm from other units and other metal planessupport. units.Vertical GroundReference Plane40cm80cmTest ReceiverHorizontal GroundReference PlaneEUT LISN 4.2.7 Test Results CONDUCTED WORST-CASE DATA8DPSK Frequency Range 150kHz ~ 30MHz Input Power 120Vac, 60Hz Detector Function &

Resolution Bandwidth Environmental Conditions Quasi-Peak (QP) /

Average (AV), 9kHz 23, 65%RH Tested by Jones Chang Test Date 2018/5/29 Frequency Correction Reading Value Emission Level No Factor

(dBuV)

(dBuV) Limit

(dBuV) Margin

(dB) Phase Of Power : Line (L) 1 2 3 4 5 6

(MHz) 0.18122 0.36896 0.55664 0.66221 1.49113 7.07852 Remarks:

(dB) 10.16 10.20 10.20 10.19 10.21 10.50 Q.P. 32.12 AV. 20.12 Q.P. 42.28 AV. 30.28 Q.P. 64.43 AV. Q.P. AV. 54.43

-22.15

-24.15 31.23 19.54 41.43 29.74 58.52 48.52

-17.09

-18.78 27.80 11.04 38.00 21.24 56.00 46.00

-18.00

-24.76 23.62 10.18 33.81 20.37 56.00 46.00

-22.19

-25.63 22.40 13.57 32.61 23.78 56.00 46.00

-23.39

-22.22 13.50 5.16 24.00 15.66 60.00 50.00

-36.00

-34.34 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 34 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Frequency Range 150kHz ~ 30MHz Input Power 120Vac, 60Hz Detector Function &

Resolution Bandwidth Environmental Conditions Quasi-Peak (QP) /

Average (AV), 9kHz 23, 65%RH Tested by Jones Chang Test Date 2018/5/29 Frequency Correction Phase Of Power : Neutral (N) Emission Level Reading Value No Factor

(dBuV)

(dBuV) Limit

(dBuV) Margin

(dB) 1 2 3 4 5 6

(MHz) 0.17737 0.23586 0.37287 0.55273 0.82252 7.71585 Remarks:

(dB) 10.15 10.17 10.19 10.20 10.20 10.48 Q.P. 28.72 23.26 AV. 11.42 Q.P. 38.87 AV. 21.57 Q.P. 64.61 AV. Q.P. AV. 54.61

-25.74

-33.04 6.87 33.43 17.04 62.24 52.24

-28.81

-35.20 30.37 13.08 40.56 23.27 58.44 48.44

-17.88

-25.17 28.91 11.76 39.11 21.96 56.00 46.00

-16.89

-24.04 26.35 13.53 36.55 23.73 56.00 46.00

-19.45

-22.27 11.46 1.26 21.94 11.74 60.00 50.00

-38.06

-38.26 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 35 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.3 Number of Hopping Frequency Used 4.3.1 Limits of Hopping Frequency Used Measurement At least 15 channels frequencies, and should be equally spaced. 4.3.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.3.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.3.4 Test Procedure a. Check the calibration of the measuring instrument (SA) using either an internal calibrator or a known signal from an external generator. b. Turn on the EUT and connect its antenna terminal to measurement via a low loss cable. Then set it to any one measured frequency within its operating range and make sure the instrument is operated in its linear range. c. Set the SA on MaxHold Mode, and then keep the EUT in hopping mode. Record all the signals from each channel until each one has been recorded. d. Set the SA on View mode and then plot the result on SA screen. e. Repeat above procedures until all frequencies measured were complete. 4.3.5 Deviation fromTest Standard No deviation. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 36 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.3.6 Test Results There are 79 hopping frequencies in the hopping mode and 20 hopping frequencies in the AFH mode. Please refer to next page for the test result. On the plots, it shows that the hopping frequencies are equally spaced. Number of Hopping

(Channel ) Adaptive Frequency Hoppong ( Channel ) 79 20 Limit

> 15 Pass/Fail Pass 8DPSK Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 37 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.4 Dwell Time on Each Channel 4.4.1 Limits of Dwell Time on Each Channel Measurement The average time of occupancy on any channel shall not be greater than 0.4 seconds within a period of 0.4 seconds multiplied by the number of hopping channels employed. 4.4.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analzyer 4.4.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.4.4 Test Procedures a. Check the calibration of the measuring instrument (SA) using either an internal calibrator or a known signal from an external generator. b. Turn on the EUT and connect its antenna terminal to measurement via a low loss cable. Then set it to any one measured frequency within its operating range and make sure the instrument is operated in its linear range. c. Adjust the center frequency of SA on any frequency be measured and set SA to zero span mode. And then, set RBW and VBW of spectrum analyzer to proper value. d. Measure the time duration of one transmission on the measured frequency. And then plot the result with time difference of this time duration. e. Repeat above procedures until all different time-slot modes have been completed. 4.4.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 38 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.4.6 Test Results GFSK Mode Number of transmission in a 31.6 (79 Hopping*0.4) DH1 51 (times / 5 sec) * 6.32 = 322.32 times DH3 25 (times / 5 sec) * 6.32 = 158 times DH5 18 (times / 5 sec) * 6.32 = 113.76 times Length of transmission time

(msec) 0.411 1.665 2.91 Result

(msec) 132.5 263.1 331 Limit

(sec) 0.4 0.4 0.4 Note: Test plots of the transmitting time slot are shown as below. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 DH1 DH3 DH5 Page No. 39 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 8DPSK Mode Number of transmission in a 31.6 (79 Hopping*0.4) 3DH1 50 (times / 5 sec) * 6.32 = 316 times 3DH3 27 (times / 5 sec) * 6.32 = 170.64 times 3DH5 16 (times / 5 sec) * 6.32 = 101.12 times Length of transmission time

(msec) 0.423 1.7 2.925 Result

(msec) 133.7 290.1 295.8 Limit

(sec) 0.4 0.4 0.4 Note: Test plots of the transmitting time slot are shown as below. 3DH1 3DH3 3DH5 Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 40 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.5 Channel Bandwidth 4.5.1 Limits of Channel Bandwidth Measurement For frequency hopping system operating in the 2400-2483.5 MHz, if the 20 dB bandwidth of hopping channel is greater than 25 kHz, two-thirds 20 dB bandwidth of hopping channel shell be a minimum limit for the hopping channel separation. 4.5.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer 4.5.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.5.4 Test Procedure a. Check the calibration of the measuring instrument using either an internal calibrator or a known signal from an external generator. b. Turn on the EUT and connect it to measurement instrument. Then set it to any one convenient frequency within its operating range. Set a reference level on the measuring instrument equal to the highest peak value. c. Measure the frequency difference of two frequencies that were attenuated 20 dB from the reference level. Record the frequency difference as the emission bandwidth. d. Repeat above procedures until all frequencies measured were complete. 4.5.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.5.6 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client enabled the EUT to transmit and receive data at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 41 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.5.7 Test Results Channel Frequency

(MHz) 0 39 78 2402 2441 2480 20 dB Bandwidth (MHz) GFSK 0.96 0.96 0.96 8DPSK 1.30 1.30 1.30 Spectrum Plot of Worst Value GFSK 8DPSK Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 42 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6 Occupied Bandwidth Measurement 4.6.1 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.6.2 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument 4.6.3 Test Procedure The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer through an attenuator. The bandwidth of the fundamental frequency was measured by spectrum analyzer with resolution bandwidth in the range of 1 % to 5 % of the anticipated emission bandwidth, and a video bandwidth at least 3x the resolution bandwidth and set the detector to PEAK. The width of a frequency band such that, below the lower and above the upper frequency limits, the mean powers emitted are each equal to a specified percentage 0.5 % of the total mean power of a given emission. 4.6.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.6.5 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 43 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6.6 Test Results Channel Frequency

(MHz) 0 39 78 2402 2441 2480 Occupied Bandwidth (MHz) GFSK 0.90 0.89 0.89 8DPSK 1.17 1.17 1.17 Spectrum Plot of Worst Value GFSK 8DPSK Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 44 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.7 Hopping Channel Separation 4.7.1 Limits of Hopping Channel Separation Measurement At least 25 kHz or two-third of 20 dB hopping channel bandwidth (whichever is greater). 4.7.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.7.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.7.4 Test Procedure Measurement Procedure REF a. Check the calibration of the measuring instrument using either an internal calibrator or a known signal from an external generator. b. Turn on the EUT and connect it to measurement instrument. Then set it to any one convenient frequency within its operating range. c. By using the MaxHold function record the separation of two adjacent channels. d. Measure the frequency difference of these two adjacent channels by SA MARK function. And then plot the result on SA screen. e. Repeat above procedures until all frequencies measured were complete. 4.7.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 45 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.7.6 Test Results Channel Freq.

(MHz) Adjacent Channel Separation

(MHz) 20 dB Bandwidth (MHz) Minimum Limit (MHz) Pass /

Fail GFSK 8DPSK GFSK 8DPSK GFSK 8DPSK 0 2402 1.00 39 78 2441 1.00 2480 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.30 1.30 1.30 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.87 Pass 0.87 Pass 0.87 Pass Note:

1. The minimum limit is two-third 20 dB bandwidth. Spectrum Plot of Worst Value GFSK 8DPSK Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 46 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.8 Maximum Output Power 4.8.1 Limits of Maximum Output Power Measurement The Maximum Output Power Measurement is 125 mW. 4.8.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer 4.8.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.8.4 Test Procedure a. Check the calibration of the measuring instrument using either an internal calibrator or a known signal from an external generator. b. Turn on the EUT and connect it to measurement instrument. Then set it to any one convenient frequency within its operating range. Set a reference level on the measuring instrument equal to the highest peak value. c. The center frequency of the spectrum analyzer is set to the fundamental frequency and using 3 MHz RBW and 10 MHz VBW. d. Measure the captured power within the band and recording the plot. e. Repeat above procedures until all frequencies required were complete. 4.8.5 Deviation fromTest Standard No deviation. 4.8.6 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client enabled the EUT to transmit and receive data at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 47 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.8.7 Test Results Channel Freq.

(MHz) 0 39 78 2402 2441 2480 GFSK 19.679 19.588 18.967 GFSK Output Power

(mW) Output Power

(dBm) 8DPSK 21.429 21.33 20.749 GFSK 12.94 12.92 12.78 Power Limit

(mW) Pass /

Fail 8DPSK 13.31 125 Pass 13.29 125 Pass 13.17 125 Pass Spectrum Plot of Worst Value 8DPSK Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 48 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.9 Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement 4.9.1 Limits Of Conducted Out Of Band Emission Measurement Below 20 dB of the highest emission level of operating band (in 100 kHz RBW). 4.9.2 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.9.3 Test Procedure The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer via a low lose cable. Set both RBW and VBW of spectrum analyzer to 100 kHz and 300 kHz with suitable frequency span including 100 MHz bandwidth from band edge. The band edges was measured and recorded. 4.9.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.9.5 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client enabled the EUT to transmit and receive data at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. 4.9.6 Test Results The spectrum plots are attached on the following images. D1 line indicates the highest level, D2 line indicates the 20 dB offset below D1. It shows compliance with the requirement. Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 49 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 GFSK Hopping Disabled_Low Channel Hopping Disabled_Middle Channel Hopping Disabled_High Channel Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 50 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Hopping Enabled_Low Channel Hopping Enabled_High Channel Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 51 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 8DPSK Hopping Disabled_Low Channel Hopping Disabled_Middle Channel Hopping Disabled_High Channel Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 52 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Hopping Enabled_Low Channel Hopping Enabled_Low Channel Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 53 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 54 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Appendix Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are FCC recognized accredited test firms and accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Linko EMC/RF Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-3-6668323 The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

--- END ---

Report No.: RF180209C22-1 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 55 / 55 Report Format Version: 6.1.1

 

 

May 7, 2018 Declaration We, Fossil Group, Inc., declare that the device, FCC ID: UK7-DW6A, does not support any non-US channels in all the operational mode(s). All non-US frequencies, US 2.4G channel 12-13 and Country code selection are disabled through proprietary software and are not user changeable. Should you have any question or comment regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Christopher King Vice President, Chief Compliance & Risk Officer Fossil Group, Inc. 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX 75080 USA Email: regulatorycompliance@fossil.com Tel: 469-587-2628 Fax: 972-638-2771

 

 

FCC Test Report Report No.: RF180209C22-2 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A Test Model: DW6F1 Series Model: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Received Date: Feb. 09, 2018 Test Date: Mar. 28, 2018 ~ May 31, 2018 Issued Date: Jun. 01, 2018 Applicant: Fossil Group, Inc. Address: 901 S. Central Expwy., Richardson, TX 75080 USA Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Lab Address: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan

( R.O.C ) Test Location: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. FCC Registration /

Designation Number:

788550 / TW0003 This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Page No. 1 / 41 Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Certificate of Conformity ........................................................................................................................... 5 2 Summary of Test Results ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Modification Record .............................................................................................................................. 6 3 General Information ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 General Description of EUT .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Description of Test Modes ..................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail .................................................................... 9 3.3 Duty Cycle of Test Signal .................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Description of Support Units ................................................................................................................ 11 3.4.1 Configuration of System under Test .......................................................................................... 11 3.5 General Description of Applied Standards ........................................................................................... 11 4 Test Types and Results ............................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement .............................................................................. 12 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement ..................................................... 12 4.1.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.3 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 14 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 15 4.1.5 Test Set Up ............................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 16 4.1.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 17 4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement .................................................................................................... 25 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement ........................................................................... 25 4.2.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 25 4.2.3 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 25 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 26 4.2.5 TEST SETUP ............................................................................................................................ 26 4.2.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 26 4.2.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 27 4.3 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement ............................................................................................................ 29 4.3.1 Limits of 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement ................................................................................... 29 4.3.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 29 4.3.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 29 4.3.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 29 4.3.5 Deviation fromTest Standard .................................................................................................... 29 4.3.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 29 4.3.7 Test Result ................................................................................................................................ 30 4.4 Occupied Bandwidth Measurement .................................................................................................... 31 4.4.1 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 31 4.4.2 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 31 4.4.3 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.4.4 Deviation From Test Standard .................................................................................................. 31 4.4.5 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 31 4.4.6 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 32 4.5 Conducted Output Power Measurement ............................................................................................ 33 4.5.1 Limits of Conducted Output Power Measurement.................................................................... 33 4.5.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 33 4.5.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 33 4.5.4 Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 33 4.5.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 33 4.5.6 EUT Operating Conditions ........................................................................................................ 33 4.5.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 34 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 2 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6 Power Spectral Density Measurement ............................................................................................... 35 4.6.1 Limits of Power Spectral Density Measurement ....................................................................... 35 4.6.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 35 4.6.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 35 4.6.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 35 4.6.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 35 4.6.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 35 4.6.7 Test Results .............................................................................................................................. 36 4.7 Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement ............................................................................... 37 4.7.1 Limits of Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement ....................................................... 37 4.7.2 Test Setup ................................................................................................................................. 37 4.7.3 Test Instruments ....................................................................................................................... 37 4.7.4 Test Procedure ......................................................................................................................... 37 4.7.5 Deviation from Test Standard ................................................................................................... 37 4.7.6 EUT Operating Condition ......................................................................................................... 37 4.7.7 TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 38 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements................................................................................................................ 40 Appendix Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................ 41 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 3 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Issue No. Description RF180209C22-2 Original Release Release Control Record Date Issued Jun. 01, 2018 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 4 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 1 Certificate of Conformity Product: Smart Watch Test Model: DW6F1 Series Model: DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Sample Status:

Identical Prototype Applicant: Fossil Group, Inc. Test Date: Mar. 28, 2018 ~ May 31, 2018 Standards: 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) ANSI C63.10:2013 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the samples RF characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by :

, Date:

Jun. 01, 2018 Approved by

:

Gina Liu / Specialist

, Date:

Jun. 01, 2018 Dylan Chiou / Project Engineer Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 5 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 2 Summary of Test Results FCC Clause 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) Test Item Result Remarks 15.207 AC Power Conducted Emission Pass 15.205 & 209 Radiated Emissions Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Minimum passing margin is -18.34 dB at 0.49408 MHz. Meet the requirement of limit. Minimum passing margin is -4.9 dB at 59.01 MHz. 15.247(d) Band Edge Measurement Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.247(d) Antenna Port Emission Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.247(a)(2) 6 dB Bandwidth Pass Meet the requirement of limit.

---

Occupied Bandwidth Measurement Pass Reference only 15.247(b) 15.247(e) Conducted power Pass Meet the requirement of limit. Power Spectral Density Pass Meet the requirement of limit. 15.203 Antenna Requirement Pass No antenna connector is used. 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT:

The listed uncertainties are the worst case uncertainty for the entire range of measurement. Please note that the uncertainty values are provided for informational purposes only and are not used in determining the PASS/FAIL results. Measurement Frequency Conducted Emissions at mains ports 150 kHz ~ 30 MHz Radiated Emissions up to 30 MHz 9 kHz ~ 30 MHz Radiated Emissions up to 1 GHz Radiated Emissions above 1 GHz 30 MHz ~ 200 MHz 200 MHz ~1000 MHz 1 GHz ~ 18 GHz 18 GHz ~ 40 GHz Expended Uncertainty

(k=2) () 2.44 dB 2.855 dB 2.93 dB 2.95 dB 2.26 dB 1.94 dB 2.2 Modification Record There were no modifications required for compliance. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 6 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3 General Information 3.1 General Description of EUT Product Test Model Series Model Status of EUT Power Supply Rating Smart Watch DW6F1 DW6A1, DW6B1, DW6D1 Identical Prototype 5 Vdc (host equipment) 3.8 Vdc (battery) Modulation Type Transfer Rate GFSK 1 Mbps Operating Frequency 2402 ~ 2480 MHz Number of Channel 40 Output Power Antenna Type Antenna Connector 2.203 mW Loop antenna N/A Accessory Device Refer to Note as below Data Cable Supplied Refer to Note as below Note:

1. All models are listed as below. Model DW6F1 DW6A1 DW6B1 DW6D1 2.4G / BT Antenna Gain (dBi) GPS

-5.6

-5.67

-7.12

-5.75

-7.03

-7.22

-8.86

-7.76 Description The models have the same layout, circuit, LCD panel and components, but different appearance & brand. Therefore, only DW6F1 was chosen for worst test. 2. The EUT accessories list refers to EUT Photo.pdf. 3. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 7 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.2 Description of Test Modes 40 channels are provided to this EUT:

Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2402 2404 2406 2408 2410 2412 2414 2416 2418 2420 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2422 2424 2426 2428 2430 2432 2434 2436 2438 2440 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2442 2444 2446 2448 2450 2452 2454 2456 2458 2460 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 2462 2464 2466 2468 2470 2472 2474 2476 2478 2480 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 8 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail EUT Configure Mode Applicable To RE1G RE<1G PLC APCM Description

-

-

Where RE1G: Radiated Emission above 1 GHz RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1 GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission APCM: Antenna Port Conducted Measurement Note: The EUT had been pre-tested on the positioned of each 3 axis. The worst case was found when positioned on Z-plane. Note: -means no effect. Radiated Emission Test (Above 1 GHz):

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode

-

Available Channel Tested Channel Modulation Type Data Rate (Mbps) 0 to 39 0, 19, 39 GFSK 1 Radiated Emission Test (Below 1 GHz):

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode

-

Available Channel Tested Channel Modulation Type Data Rate (Mbps) 0 to 39 39 GFSK 1 Power Line Conducted Emission Test:

Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode

-

Available Channel Tested Channel Modulation Type Data Rate (Mbps) 0 to 39 39 GFSK 1 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 9 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Antenna Port Conducted Measurement:

This item includes all test value of each mode, but only includes spectrum plot of worst value of each mode. Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT Configure Mode

-

Test Condition:

Available Channel Tested Channel Modulation Type Data Rate (Mbps) 0 to 39 0, 19, 39 GFSK 1 Applicable To Environmental Conditions Input Power Tested by RE1G RE<1G PLC APCM 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz Greg Lin Luis Lee 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 120 Vac, 60 Hz Jones Chang 25 deg. C, 65 % RH 3.8 Vdc Carlos Chen 3.3 Duty Cycle of Test Signal Duty cycle of test signal is < 98 %

Duty cycle = 0.387/0.625 = 0.619, Duty factor = 10 * log(1/0.619) = 2.08 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 10 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 3.4 Description of Support Units The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. No. 1. No. 1. N/A Note:

Product Adapter Brand HTC Model No. TC U250 Serial No. N/A FCC ID N/A Signal Cable Description Of The Above Support Units 1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m). 3.4.1 Configuration of System under Test

*Test Table EUT

(Power from adapter) 3.5 General Description of Applied Standards The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards:

FCC Part 15, Subpart C (15.247) 558074 D01 DTS Meas Guidance v04 ANSI C63.10-2013 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. Note: The EUT has been verified to comply with the requirements of FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B (DoC). The test report has been issued separately. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 11 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4 Test Types and Results 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement Radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands must comply with the radiated emission limits specified as below table. Other emissions shall be at least 20 dB below the highest level of the desired power:

Frequencies

(MHz) 0.009 ~ 0.490 0.490 ~ 1.705 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 ~ 88 88 ~ 216 216 ~ 960 Above 960 Field Strength

(microvolts/meter) Measurement Distance

(meters) 2400/F (kHz) 24000/F (kHz) 30 100 150 200 500 300 30 30 3 3 3 3 Note:

1. 2. 3. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). For frequencies above 1000 MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20 dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 12 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.2 Test Instruments Description &

Manufacturer Test Receiver ROHDE & SCHWARZ Spectrum Analyzer ROHDE & SCHWARZ BILOG Antenna SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna SCHWARZBECK Model No. Serial No. Date of Calibration Due Date of Calibration ESCI 100424 Oct. 17, 2017 Oct. 16, 2018 FSP40 100041 Dec. 12, 2017 Dec. 11, 2018 VULB9168 9168-171 Dec. 11, 2017 Dec. 10, 2018 9120D 209 Dec. 13, 2017 Dec. 12, 2018 BBHA 9170 BBHA9170241 Dec. 01, 2017 Nov. 30, 2018 Loop Antenna 6509 00217556 Aug. 31, 2017 Aug. 30, 2018 Preamplifier Agilent

(Below 1GHz) Preamplifier Agilent

(Above 1GHz) RF signal cable HUBER+SUHNER RF signal cable HUBER+SUHNER&

EMCI Software BV ADT Antenna Tower inn-co GmbH Antenna Tower Controller BV ADT Turn Table BV ADT Turn Table Controller BV ADT High Speed Peak Power Meter Power Sensor 8447D 2944A10738 Aug. 21, 2017 Aug. 20, 2018 8449B 3008A01923 Oct. 23, 2017 Oct. 22, 2018 SUCOFLEX 104 SUCOFLEX 104&EMC104-SM-

SM-8000 ADT_Radiated_ V7.6.15.9.4 Cable-CH3-03

(223653/4) Cable-CH3-03

(309224+170907) NA MA 4000 013303 AT100 AT93021702 TT100 TT93021702 SC100 SC93021702 Aug. 21, 2017 Aug. 20, 2018 Sep.11, 2017 Sep. 10, 2018 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ML2495A MA2411B 0824012 Aug. 18, 2017 Aug. 17, 2018 0738171 Aug. 18, 2017 Aug. 17, 2018 Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 3. 3. The horn antenna and preamplifier (model: 8449B) are used only for the measurement of emission frequency above 1 GHz if tested. 4. The FCC Designation Number is TW0003. The number will be varied with the Lab location and scope as attached. 5. The IC Site Registration No. is IC 7450F-3. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 13 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.3 Test Procedures For Radiated Emission below 30 MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter chamber room. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. Parallel, perpendicular, and ground-parallel orientations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Quasi-Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. Note:

1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 9 kHz at frequency below 30 MHz. 2. There is a comparison data of both open-field test site and semi-Anechoic chamber, and the result came out very similar. For Radiated Emission above 30 MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters (for 30 MHz ~ 1 GHz) / 1.5 meters (for above 1 GHz) above the ground at 3 meter chamber room for test. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The height of antenna is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is below 1 GHz. f. The test-receiver system was set to peak and average detected function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is above 1 GHz. If the peak reading value also meets average limit, measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. Note:

1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120 kHz for Quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency below 1 GHz. 2. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and the video bandwidth is 3 MHz for Peak detection (PK) at frequency above 1 GHz. 3. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and the video bandwidth is 1/T

(Duty cycle < 98 %) or 10 Hz (Duty cycle 98 %) for Average detection (AV) at frequency above 1 GHz.

(RBW = 1 MHz, VBW = 3 kHz) 4. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 14 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.1.5 Test Set Up

<Radiated emission below 30 MHz>

EUT&

Support Units 3m Turn Table 80cm 1 m

<Frequency Range below 1 GHz>

Ground Plane Test Receiver 3m Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 15 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 10mAnt. Tower1-4m VariableTurn TableEUT& Support UnitsGround PlaneTest Receiver80cm

<Frequency Range above 1 GHz>

EUT&

Support Units 3m Ant. Tower 1-4m Variable Turn Table Absorber 150cm Ground Plane Test Receiver For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions a. Placed the EUT on the testing table. b. Set the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 16 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.1.7 Test Results ABOVE 1GHz DATA BT_LE-GFSK CHANNEL TX Channel 0 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 17 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2390.00 2390.00 56.1 PK 44.4 AV

*2402.00 90.0 PK

*2402.00 4804.00 4804.00 85.8 AV 41.9 PK 28.9 AV 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.9

-9.6

-32.1

-25.1 1.78 H 1.78 H 1.70 H 1.70 H 1.52 H 1.52 H 124 124 136 136 204 204 23.90 12.20 57.80 53.60 40.80 27.80 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 1.10 1.10 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2390.00 2390.00 56.6 PK 44.8 AV

*2402.00 92.7 PK

*2402.00 4804.00 4804.00 88.3 AV 42.5 PK 29.3 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.4

-9.2

-31.5

-24.7 1.13 V 1.13 V 1.08 V 1.08 V 1.88 V 1.88 V 257 257 250 250 297 297 24.40 12.60 60.50 56.10 41.40 28.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 1.10 1.10 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 18 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 19 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 19 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4

*2440.00 88.7 PK

*2440.00 4880.00 4880.00 84.5 AV 42.5 PK 28.9 AV 74.0 54.0

-31.5

-25.1 1.69 H 1.69 H 1.58 H 1.58 H 128 128 212 212 56.70 52.50 41.20 27.60 32.00 32.00 1.30 1.30 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4

*2440.00 91.5 PK

*2440.00 4880.00 4880.00 87.2 AV 42.9 PK 29.7 AV 74.0 54.0

-31.1

-24.3 1.85 V 1.85 V 1.93 V 1.93 V 252 252 312 312 59.50 55.20 41.60 28.40 32.00 32.00 1.30 1.30 REMARKS:

1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 20 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 CHANNEL TX Channel 39 FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Peak (PK) Average (AV) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 21 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2480.00 87.8 PK

*2480.00 2483.50 2483.50 4960.00 4960.00 83.9 AV 56.3 PK 44.2 AV 43.0 PK 29.7 AV 74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.7

-9.8

-31.0

-24.3 1.74 H 1.74 H 1.85 H 1.85 H 1.64 H 1.64 H 132 132 124 124 219 219 55.70 51.80 24.20 12.10 41.10 27.80 32.10 32.10 32.10 32.10 1.90 1.90 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M NO. FREQ.

(MHz) EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) FACTOR

(dB/m) 1 2 3 4 5 6

*2480.00 90.6 PK

*2480.00 86.5 AV 2483.50 2483.50 4960.00 4960.00 56.6 PK 44.5 AV 43.4 PK 30.2 AV REMARKS:

74.0 54.0 74.0 54.0

-17.4

-9.5

-30.6

-23.8 1.66 V 1.66 V 1.77 V 1.77 V 1.74 V 1.74 V 251 251 238 238 331 331 58.50 54.40 24.50 12.40 41.50 28.30 32.10 32.10 32.10 32.10 1.90 1.90 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 22 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 9 kHz ~ 30 MHz Data:

The amplitude of spurious emissions attenuated more than 20 dB below the permissible value is not required to be report. 30 MHz ~ 1 GHz Worst-Case Data:

BT_LE-GFSK CHANNEL TX Channel 0 FREQUENCY RANGE 30MHz ~ 1GHz DETECTOR FUNCTION Quasi-Peak (QP) Horizontal Vertical Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 23 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 FREQ.

(MHz) 86.17 272.45 307.38 375.29 445.15 707.10 FREQ.

(MHz) 59.01 66.77 105.58 272.45 375.29 939.95 REMARKS:

EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 24.7 QP 24.1 QP 23.6 QP 30.9 QP 26.5 QP 35.4 QP EMISSION LEVEL

(dBuV/m) 35.1 QP 34.5 QP 25.5 QP 23.0 QP 29.4 QP 36.5 QP ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION 40.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0

-15.3

-21.9

-22.4

-15.1

-19.5

-10.6 1.01 H 1.01 H 1.50 H 1.01 H 1.01 H 1.01 H 124 7 300 310 265 7 43.90 37.00 35.60 41.60 35.70 39.30 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M LIMIT MARGIN

(dBuV/m)

(dB) HEIGHT ANGLE

(m)

(Degree) VALUE

(dBuV) ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION 40.0 40.0 43.5 46.0 46.0 46.0

-4.9

-5.5

-18.0

-23.0

-16.6

-9.5 1.49 V 1.00 V 1.00 V 1.00 V 1.00 V 1.00 V 111 221 192 281 167 318 49.20 49.60 43.10 35.90 40.10 35.70 FACTOR

(dB/m)

-19.20

-12.90

-12.00

-10.70

-9.20

-3.90 FACTOR

(dB/m)

-14.10

-15.10

-17.60

-12.90

-10.70 0.80 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level Limit value Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 24 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement Frequency (MHz) 0.15 - 0.5 0.50 - 5.0 5.0 - 30.0 Conducted Limit (dBuV) Quasi-peak 66 - 56 56 60 Average 56 - 46 46 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz. 4.2.2 Test Instruments Description &

Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Date Of Calibration Due Date Of Calibration ESCI 5D-FB 100613 Nov. 22, 2018 Nov. 23, 2017 Cable-cond1-01 Test Receiver ROHDE & SCHWARZ RF signal cable (with 10dB PAD) Woken LISN/AMN ROHDE & SCHWARZ

(EUT) LISN/AMN ROHDE & SCHWARZ

(Peripheral) Software ADT Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable BV ADT_Cond_ Sep. 05, 2017 Sep. 04, 2018 Aug. 15, 2017 Aug. 14, 2018 Mar. 06, 2018 Mar. 05, 2019 835239/001 ESH3-Z5 ESH3-Z5 V7.3.7.3 100311 NA NA NA to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Shielded Room 1. 3. The VCCI Site Registration No. is C-2040. 4.2.3 Test Procedures a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/50 uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The frequency range from 150 kHz to 30 MHz was searched. Emission levels under (Limit 20 dB) was not recorded. Note: All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 25 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.2.5 TEST SETUP 4.2.6 EUT Operating Conditions a. Placed the EUT on the testing table. b. Set the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 26 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Note: 1.Support units were connected to second LISN. 2.Both of LISNs (AMN) are 80 cm from EUT and at least 80cm from other units and other metal planessupport. units.Vertical GroundReference Plane40cm80cmTest ReceiverHorizontal GroundReference PlaneEUT LISN 4.2.7 Test Results Frequency Range 150kHz ~ 30MHz Input Power 120Vac, 60Hz Detector Function &

Resolution Bandwidth Environmental Conditions Quasi-Peak (QP) /

Average (AV), 9kHz 23, 65%RH Tested by Jones Chang Test Date 2018/5/29 Frequency Correction Reading Value Emission Level No Factor

(dBuV)

(dBuV) Limit

(dBuV) Margin

(dB) Phase Of Power : Line (L) 1 2 3 4 5 6

(MHz) 0.21256 0.40024 0.49408 0.69740 1.39729 19.49668 Remarks:

(dB) 10.16 10.21 10.20 10.19 10.20 11.22 Q.P. 26.34 27.72 27.56 22.67 12.70 15.48 AV. 6.77 8.56 9.41 4.21 1.18 3.21 Q.P. 36.50 AV. 16.93 Q.P. 63.10 AV. Q.P. AV. 53.10

-26.60

-36.17 37.93 18.77 57.85 47.85

-19.92

-29.08 37.76 19.61 56.10 46.10

-18.34

-26.49 32.86 14.40 56.00 46.00

-23.14

-31.60 22.90 11.38 56.00 46.00

-33.10

-34.62 26.70 14.43 60.00 50.00

-33.30

-35.57 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 27 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Frequency Range 150kHz ~ 30MHz Input Power 120Vac, 60Hz Detector Function &

Resolution Bandwidth Environmental Conditions Quasi-Peak (QP) /

Average (AV), 9kHz 23, 65%RH Tested by Jones Chang Test Date 2018/5/29 Frequency Correction Phase Of Power : Neutral (N) Emission Level Reading Value No Factor

(dBuV)

(dBuV) Limit

(dBuV) Margin

(dB) 1 2 3 4 5 6

(MHz) 0.19305 0.38851 0.48626 0.71304 1.45985 5.78822 Remarks:

(dB) 10.16 10.19 10.20 10.20 10.21 10.41 Q.P. 24.95 AV. 7.01 Q.P. 35.11 AV. 17.17 Q.P. 63.90 AV. Q.P. AV. 53.90

-28.79

-36.73 25.56 10.12 35.75 20.31 58.10 48.10

-22.35

-27.79 26.90 13.69 37.10 23.89 56.23 46.23

-19.13

-22.34 24.15 10.81 34.35 21.01 56.00 46.00

-21.65

-24.99 13.69 9.77 3.51 1.03 23.90 13.72 56.00 46.00

-32.10

-32.28 20.18 11.44 60.00 50.00

-39.82

-38.56 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 28 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.3 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement 4.3.1 Limits of 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement The minimum of 6 dB Bandwidth Measurement is 0.5 MHz. 4.3.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.3.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.3.4 Test Procedure a. Set resolution bandwidth (RBW) = 100 kHz b. Set the video bandwidth (VBW) 3 x RBW, Detector = Peak. c. Trace mode = max hold. d. Sweep = auto couple. e. Measure the maximum width of the emission that is constrained by the frequencies associated with the two amplitude points (upper and lower) that are attenuated by 6 dB relative to the maximum level measured in the fundamental emission 4.3.5 Deviation fromTest Standard No deviation. 4.3.6 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 29 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.3.7 Test Result Channel Frequency (MHz) 0 19 39 2402 2440 2480 6 dB Bandwidth Minimum Limit

(MHz) 0.68 0.68 0.69

(MHz) 0.5 0.5 0.5 Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass Spectrum Plot of Worst Value Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 30 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.4 Occupied Bandwidth Measurement 4.4.1 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.4.2 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.4.3 Test Procedure The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer through an attenuator. The bandwidth of the fundamental frequency was measured by spectrum analyzer with resolution bandwidth in the range of 1 % to 5 % of the anticipated emission bandwidth, and a video bandwidth at least 3x the resolution bandwidth and set the detector to PEAK. The width of a frequency band such that, below the lower and above the upper frequency limits, the mean powers emitted are each equal to a specified percentage 0.5 %of the total mean power of a given emission. 4.4.4 Deviation From Test Standard No deviation. 4.4.5 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 31 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.4.6 Test Results Channel Frequency (MHz) 0 19 39 2402 2440 2480 Occupied Bandwidth

(MHz) 1.06 1.06 1.06 Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass Spectrum Plot of Worst Value Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 32 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.5 Conducted Output Power Measurement 4.5.1 Limits of Conducted Output Power Measurement For systems using digital modulation in the 24002483.5 MHz bands: 1 Watt (30 dBm) 4.5.2 Test Setup EUT Power Sensor Attenuator Power Meter 4.5.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.5.4 Test Procedures A peak / average power sensor was used on the output port of the EUT. A power meter was used to read the response of the peak / average power sensor. Record the power level. 4.5.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.5.6 EUT Operating Conditions The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 33 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.5.7 Test Results Channel 0 19 39 Channel 0 19 39 Frequency Peak Power Peak Power

(MHz) 2402 2440 2480

(mW) 2.188 2.203 2.148

(dBm) 3.40 3.43 3.32 Frequency Average Power Average Power

(MHz) 2402 2440 2480

(mW) 2.094 2.113 2.051

(dBm) 3.21 3.25 3.12 Limit

(dBm) Pass / Fail 30 30 30 Pass Pass Pass Limit

(dBm) Pass / Fail 30 30 30 Pass Pass Pass Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 34 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6 Power Spectral Density Measurement 4.6.1 Limits of Power Spectral Density Measurement The Maximum of Power Spectral Density Measurement is 8 dBm. 4.6.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.6.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.6.4 Test Procedure a. Set the RBW = 3 kHz, VBW =10 kHz, Detector = peak. b. Sweep time = auto couple, Trace mode = max hold, allow trace to fully stabilize. c. Use the peak marker function to determine the maximum power level in any 100 kHz band segment within the fundamental EBW. 4.6.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.6.6 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 35 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.6.7 Test Results Channel Frequency

(MHz) PSD Limit

(dBm/3 kHz)

(dBm/3 kHz) Pass / Fail 0 19 39 2402 2440 2480

-12.40

-12.48

-12.63 8 8 8 Pass Pass Pass Spectrum Plot of Worst Value Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 36 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.7 Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement 4.7.1 Limits of Conducted Out of Band Emission Measurement Below 20 dB of the highest emission level of operating band (in 100 kHz Resolution Bandwidth). 4.7.2 Test Setup EUT Spectrum Analyzer Attenuator 4.7.3 Test Instruments Refer to section 4.1.2 to get information of above instrument. 4.7.4 Test Procedure MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE REF 1. Set the RBW = 100 kHz. 2. Set the VBW 300 kHz. 3. Detector = peak. 4. Sweep time = auto couple. 5. Trace mode = max hold. 6. Allow trace to fully stabilize. 7. Use the peak marker function to determine the maximum power level in any 100 kHz band segment within the fundamental EBW. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE OOBE 1. Set RBW = 100 kHz. 2. Set VBW 300 kHz. 3. Detector = peak. 4. Sweep = auto couple. 5. Trace Mode = max hold. 6. Allow trace to fully stabilize. 7. Use the peak marker function to determine the maximum amplitude level. 4.7.5 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.7.6 EUT Operating Condition The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest, middle and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 37 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 4.7.7 TEST RESULTS Ch 0 Ch 19 Ch 39 Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 38 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Ch 0 Band Edge Ch 39 Band Edge Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 39 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 40 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Appendix Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are FCC recognized accredited test firms and accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:

Linko EMC/RF Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-3-6668323 The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

--- END ---

Report No.: RF180209C22-2 Reference No.: 180209C31 Page No. 41 / 41 Report Format Version: 6.1.1

 

 

PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST FCC ID: UK7-DW6A 1 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A

(NFC) 2 RADIATED EMISSION TEST

(Below 1GHz) 3 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A RADIATED EMISSION TEST

(Above 1GHz) 4 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A RADIATED EMISSION TEST

(NFC) 5 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A FCC ID: UK7-DW6A 6 FCC ID: UK7-DW6A 7